| Literature DB >> 31906454 |
Kristina Ferenczyova1, Barbora Kalocayova1, Lucia Kindernay1, Marek Jelemensky1, Peter Balis2, Andrea Berenyiova2, Anna Zemancikova2, Veronika Farkasova1, Matus Sykora1, Lubomira Tothova3, Tomas Jasenovec4, Jana Radosinska1,4, Jozef Torok2, Sona Cacanyiova2, Miroslav Barancik1, Monika Bartekova1,4.
Abstract
Background: Quercetin (QCT) was shown to exert beneficial cardiovascular effects in young healthy animals. The aim of the present study was to determine cardiovascular benefits of QCT in older, 6-month and 1-year-old Zucker diabetic fatty (ZDF) rats (model of type 2 diabetes).Entities:
Keywords: RISK pathway; blood pressure; cardiovascular disease; infarct size; ischemia-reperfusion injury; quercetin; vascular relaxation
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 31906454 PMCID: PMC6983107 DOI: 10.3390/molecules25010187
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Biometric and biochemical parameters of 6-month-old and 1-year-old ZDF rats.
| 6-Month-Old Rats | 1-Year-Old Rats | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LEAN | OBESE | Two-Way ANOVA | LEAN | OBESE | Two-Way ANOVA | |||||||||
| C | Q | Dia | DiaQ | Diabetes | Treatment | Interaction | C | Q | Dia | DiaQ | Diabetes | Treatment | Interaction | |
|
| 349 ± 7 | 346 ± 9 | 493 ± 8 | 487 ± 10 | **** | ns. | ns. | 406 ± 10 | 413 ± 8 | 520 ± 25 | 514 ± 24 | **** | ns. | ns. |
|
| 9.2 ±0.2 | 8.9 ± 0.2 | 13.2 ± 0.2 | 12.9 ± 0.3 | **** | ns. | ns. | 10.2 ± 0.2 | 10.3 ± 0.2 | 13.7 ± 0.6 | 13.4 ± 0.7 | **** | ns. | ns. |
|
| 0.03 ± 0.001 | 0.03 ± 0.001 | 0.04 ± 0.001 | 0.04 ± 0.001 | **** | ns. | ns. | 0.03 ± 0.001 | 0.03 ± 0.001 | 0.04 ± 0.001 | 0.04 ± 0.01 | ** | ns. | ns. |
|
| 7.3 ± 0.4 | 6.9 ± 0.2 | 11.2 ± 1.3 | 12.6 ± 1.9 | ** | ns. | ns. | 6.1 ± 0.1 | 5.9 ± 0.2 | 16.9 ± 1.6 | 18.5 ± 2.1 | **** | ns. | ns. |
|
| 0.38 ± 0.13 | 0.40 ± 0.08 | 5.87 ± 0.89 | 5.76 ± 1.23 | **** | ns. | ns. | 0.24 ± 0.05 | 0.18 ± 0.03 | 3.66 ± 0.41 | 3.67 ± 0.39 | **** | ns. | ns. |
|
| 1.92 ± 0.09 | 1.63 ± 0.07 | 2.44 ± 0.28 | 2.7 ± 0.32 | ** | ns. | ns. | 2.85 ± 0.11 | 2.81 ± 0.08 | 4.86 ± 0.41 | 4.79 ± 0.25 | **** | ns. | ns. |
|
| 0.93 ± 0.08 | 0.67 ± 0.07 | 1.01 ± 0.18 | 0.97 ± 0.16 | ns. | ns. | ns. | 1.36 ± 0.04 | 1.37 ± 0.04 | 2.36 ± 0.13 | 2.37 ± 0.07 | **** | ns. | ns. |
|
| 0.46 ± 0.03 | 0.36 ± 0.02 | 0.34 ± 0.07 | 0.32 ± 0.06 | ns. | ns. | ns. | 0.82 ± 0.04 | 0.81 ± 0.02 | 1.05 ± 0.08 | 0.91 ± 0.07 | * | ns. | ns. |
Experimental groups: C—non-treated lean controls; Q—quercetin-treated lean rats; Dia—non-treated obese diabetic rats; DiaQ—quercetin-treated obese diabetic rats; Abbreviations: BW—body weight; HW—heart weight; TAG—triacylglycerides; Ch—cholesterol; HDL—high-density lipoprotein; LDL—low-density lipoprotein. Data are presented as means ± SEM. Significant differences were evaluated by two-way ANOVA with main factors diabetes and quercetin treatment. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; **** p < 0.0001.
Figure 1Systolic blood pressure (BP) measured by tail-cuff plethysmography in younger (A,C) and older (B,D) ZDF rats: BP beginning—measured before start of quercetin treatment (A,B); BP end—measured after the completion of quercetin treatment (end of week 6) (C,D). Results are expressed as means ± SEM. Significant differences were evaluated by two-way ANOVA for main factors diabetes and quercetin treatment.
Figure 2Maximal and overall relaxation of thoracic aorta: diabetes dependence. The endothelium-dependent vasorelaxant responses of thoracic aorta induced by acetylcholine in younger (A) and older (B) rats; and effect of treatment with quercetin on overall acetylcholine-induced relaxation of thoracic aorta in younger (C) and older (D) rats. AUC—area under the curve; a.u.—arbitrary units. Results are expressed as mean ± SEM. Significant differences were evaluated by two-way ANOVA for main factors diabetes and quercetin treatment (shown for maximal (A,B) and overall (C,D) relaxation). Tukey post hoc test was used to describe the differences in mean values of the experimental groups. # p < 0.05 vs. C; * p < 0.05 vs. Dia; + p < 0.05 vs. Q.
Figure 3The endothelium-dependent vasorelaxant responses of thoracic aorta induced by acetylcholine in lean (A) and obese (B) rats. Results are expressed as mean ± SEM. Significant differences were evaluated by two-way ANOVA for main factors diabetes and quercetin treatment (shown for maximal relaxation). Tukey post hoc test was used to describe the differences in mean values of the experimental groups. # p < 0.05 vs. C-younger; +p < 0.05 vs. Q-younger.
Figure 4Correlations between maximal relaxation and glycaemia. The mutual relationship between maximal vasorelaxation induced by acetylcholine in thoracic aorta and plasma glucose level in rats without (A) and with (B) the treatment with quercetin. Max R = maximal relaxation.
Pre-ischemic (baseline) values of functional parameters of isolated hearts.
| 6-Month-Old Rats | 1-Year-Old Rats | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LEAN | OBESE | Two-Way ANOVA | LEAN | OBESE | Two-Way ANOVA | |||||||||
| C | Q | Dia | DiaQ | Diabetes | Treatment | Interaction | C | Q | Dia | DiaQ | Diabetes | Treatment | Interaction | |
|
| 81 ± 7 | 72 ± 9 | 83 ± 8 | 71 ± 3 | ns. | ns. | ns. | 73 ± 5 | 90 ± 9 | 114 ± 9 | 109 ± 4 | *** | ns. | ns. |
|
| 1789 ± 179 | 1548 ± 241 | 1615 ±187 | 1383 ± 123 | ns. | ns. | ns. | 1522 ± 135 | 1909 ± 213 | 2143 ± 156 | 2048 ± 110 | * | ns. | ns. |
|
| 1287 ± 127 | 1187 ± 183 | 1317 ±154 | 1136 ± 112 | ns. | ns. | ns. | 1158 ± 143 | 1451 ± 198 | 1690 ± 128 | 1661 ± 72 | * | ns. | ns. |
|
| 226 ± 28 | 237 ± 13 | 207 ± 18 | 173 ± 19 | ns. | ns. | ns. | 227 ± 29 | 210 ± 10 | 154 ± 12 | 162 ± 17 | ** | ns. | ns. |
|
| 18,583 ± 3047 | 16,867 ± 2304 | 17,495 ± 2975 | 12,300 ± 1629 | ns. | ns. | ns. | 16,533 ± 2298 | 19,060 ± 2675 | 17,341 ± 1494 | 17,794 ± 2107 | ns. | ns. | ns. |
|
| 12 ± 2 | 16 ± 2 | 15 ± 1 | 12 ± 2 | ns. | ns. | ns. | 12 ± 2 | 12 ± 0 | 18 ± 1 | 16 ± 1 | *** | ns. | ns. |
Experimental groups: C—non-treated lean controls; Q—quercetin-treated lean rats; Dia—non-treated obese diabetic rats; DiaQ—quercetin-treated obese diabetic rats; Abbreviations: LVDP—left ventricular developed pressure; ±(dp/dt)max—maximal rate of contraction and relaxation of left ventricular pressure (contraction/relaxation index); HR—heart rate; RPP—rate pressure product (LVDPxHR); CF—coronary flow. Data are presented as means ± SEM. Significant differences were evaluated by two-way ANOVA with main factors diabetes and quercetin treatment. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001.
Figure 5Post-ischemic recovery of left ventricle developed pressure (LVDP, systolic minus diastolic pressure) of isolated hearts from ZDF rats treated with quercetin measured in 40th minute of post-ischemic reperfusion after 30-min global ischemia in younger (A) and older (B) rats. Infarct size related to area at risk (whole left ventricle in case of global ischemia) measured by 2,3,5-triphenyltetrazolium (TTC) staining after 2-hour reperfusion of isolated hearts from younger (C) and older (D) ZDF rats. Results are expressed as mean ± SEM. Significant differences were evaluated by two-way ANOVA for main factors diabetes and quercetin treatment.
Figure 6RISK pathway proteins expression in heart tissue Effect of quercetin treatment on proteins involved in the Reperfusion Injury Salvage Kinases (RISK) pathway. Levels and/or specific phosphorylation of proteins were determined by western blotting method using specific antibodies. Akt kinase activation was expressed as a ratio of Akt kinase phosphorylated at Ser473 to protein levels of total Akt kinase in younger (A) and older (B) ZDF rats. Changes in protein levels of eNOS in younger (C) and older (D) ZDF rats were normalized to the glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) protein levels. PKCε protein levels were determined by specific antibody and obtained data were normalized to the GAPDH in younger (E) and older (F) ZDF rats. Results are expressed as mean ± SEM. Significant differences were evaluated by two-way ANOVA for main factors diabetes and quercetin treatment.
Figure 7Chemical structure of quercetin (3,5,7,3′,4′-pentahydroxyflavone).
Summary of the number of animals (rats) in experimental groups.
| Experimental Group | 6-Month-Old | 1-Year-Old |
|---|---|---|
| Control (C) | n = 12 | n = 12 |
| QCT-treated (Q) | n = 12 | n = 13 |
| Diabetic (Dia) | n = 12 | n = 16 |
| Diabetic QCT-treated (DiaQ) | n = 12 | n = 17 |
Figure 8Overall experimental design (A) and experimental protocol of I/R in isolated hearts (B). Abbreviations: Glc, fasting glycaemia measurements; BP, blood pressure measurements.