| Literature DB >> 31906356 |
Guillermo Schmeda-Hirschmann1, Alberto Burgos-Edwards1, Felipe Jiménez-Aspee2, Daniel Mieres-Castro1, Cristina Theoduloz3, Lisa Pormetter1, Ramon Fogel4, Claudia Céspedes4, Nelida Soria4, Sintya Valdez4.
Abstract
The crude drug ysypó hû (Adenocalymma marginatum DC., Bignoniaceae) is used traditionally by the Guarani of Eastern Paraguayan as a male sexual enhancer. The aim of the present study was to identify the main constituents of the crude drug and to evaluate the in vitro inhibitory activity towards the enzyme phosphodiesterase-5 (PDE-5). The main compounds were isolated by counter-current chromatography (CCC). The metabolites were identified by spectroscopic and spectrometric means. The chemical profiling of the extracts was assessed by high-performance liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS). The crude extract and main isolated compounds were tested for their PDE-5 inhibitory activity using commercial kits. The iridoid theviridoside and 4-hydroxy-1-methylproline were isolated as the main constituent of the crude drug. Four chlortheviridoside hexoside derivatives were detected for the first time as natural products. Chemical profiling by HPLC-MS/MS led to the tentative identification of nine iridoids, six phenolics, and five amino acids. The crude extracts and main compounds were inactive towards PDE-5 at concentrations up to 500 µg/mL. Iridoids and amino acid derivatives were the main compounds occurring in the Paraguayan crude drug. The potential of ysypó hû as a male sexual enhancer cannot be discarded, since other mechanisms may be involved.Entities:
Keywords: Adenocalymma marginatum; Bignoniaceae; Guarani medicine; Paraguayan crude drug; amino acid derivatives; counter-current chromatography; iridoids
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 31906356 PMCID: PMC6983124 DOI: 10.3390/molecules25010180
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1The Paraguayan crude drug “ysypó hû” (Adenocalymma marginatum). (A) flowering plant; (B) aerial parts; (C) root and stem.
Summary of the partition ratios (KD) values of biphasic solvent system (TBME/1-BuOH/ACN/H2O) for the main compounds in the Sephadex 8–15 fractions from the hydroalcoholic stem extract of Adenocalymma marginatum.
|
| ||
|---|---|---|
| System Number | Proportions of TBME: | |
| 1 | 1:3:1:5 * | 0.21 |
| 2 | 1:4:1:5 | 0.33 |
| 3 | 1:5:1:5 | 0.41 |
| 4 | 2:2:2.5:5 | 0.40 |
* Selected solvent system; U: upper organic phase; L: lower aqueous phase.
Figure 2TLC of the counter-current chromatography (CCC) fractions of the Sephadex 8–15 of Adenocalymma marginatum (silica gel, EtOAc: formic acid: H2O: acetone 10:2:3:1).
Figure 3Structure of some of the main constituents of the Paraguayan crude drug ysypó hû (Adenocalymma marginatum). Arabic and roman numbers in parenthesis refer to Table 4.
1H, 13 C nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and heteronuclear multiple bond correlation (HBMC) data of theviridoside (compound 8) and its pentaacetate (400 and 100 MHz, respectively; MeOH-d4 or CDCl3, δ-values, J in. Hz).
| 1H | 13C | 1H | 13C | HMBC | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MeOH-d4 | MeOH-d4 | CDCl3 | CDCl3 | CDCl3 | |
| 1 | 5.55 d (5.6) | 95.67 d | 5.32 d (4.4) | 95.26 d | |
| 3 | 7.52 s | 152.71 d | 7.31 s | 151.36 d | 166.63, 113.78, 95.26, 74.91 |
| 4 | - | 113.14 s | - | 113.78 s | |
| 5 | - | 75.12 s | - | 74.91 s | 5.32 |
| 6 | 2.85 br s | 45.54 t | 2.75 d (19.6) | 45.54 t | 129.81, 134.68, 74.91 |
| 7 | 5.72 s | 125.44 d | 5.68 br s | 129.81 d | |
| 8 | - | 140.59 s | - | 134.68 s | |
| 9 | 3.06 d (6.0) | 55.37 d | 3.08 d (2.4) | 54.94 d | |
| 10 | 4.25 d (14.4) | 59.63 t | 4.58 d (13.6) | 61.44 t | |
| 11 | - | 166.96 s | - | 166.63 s | |
| OMe | 3.75 s | 50.41 q | 3.67 s | 51.41 q | |
| 1’ | 4.65 d (8.0) | 98.66 d | 4.73 d (8) | 96.51 d | |
| 2’ | 3.25 dd (8.8, 8.0) | 73.18 d | 4.91 t (8.8) | 70.73 d | |
| 3’ | 3.33 m | 77.03 d | 5.16 t (9.6) | 72.03 d | |
| 4’ | 3.42 m | 76.18 d | 5.00 t (9.6) | 68.15 d | |
| 5’ | 3.32 m | 70.15 d | 3.67 m | 72.10 d | |
| 6’ | 3.83-3.85 m, | 62.87 t | 4.17 dd (12.4, 4) | 61.44 t | |
| Ac | |||||
| COO | - | - | - | 170.51 s (2C), 170.05 s, 169.76 s, 169.27 s | |
| CH3 | - | - | 2.00 s, 1.98 s, 1.93 s, 1.91 s, 1.89 s | 20.74 q, 20.62 q, 20.51 q (2C), 20.39 q |
1H- and 13C-NMR data of 4-Hydroxy-1-methyl-l-proline (compound I)(400 and 100 MHz, respectively; MeOH-d4, δ-values, J in Hz).
| H | C | HMBC | Configuration | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | - | 170.38 s | 4.36, 3.08, 2.27 | |
| 2 | 4.36 dd (11.2, 7.6) | 69.03 d | 3.88, 3.16, 3.08, 2.27 | S |
| 3 | 2.50 ddt (14, 7.2, 1.6), | 38.48 t | ||
| 4 | 4.55 m | 68.84 d | R | |
| 5 | 3.88 dd (12.4, 4.4), | 63.29 t | 3.08 | |
| N-CH3 | 3.08 s | 42.79 q | 3.88, 4.36; 63.29, 68.84 |
Figure 4Ion chromatogram in the negative ionization mode (blue trace) and positive ionization mode (red trace), and HPLC profile at 280 nm of the root (a,c) and stem (b,d) extracts from the Paraguayan crude drug ysypó hû. Numbers refer to Table 4.
Tentative identification of compounds from root and stem hydroalcoholic extracts of Adenocalymma marginatum by HPLC-ESI-MS/MS in the negative ion mode and distribution in roots and stems.
| Peak | Rt (min) | [M + H]+/[M − H]−
| MS/MS (%) | Tentative Identification | Roots | Stems |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [M + H]+ | ||||||
| I | 6.0 | 145.9 | 99.50 (100) | 4-Hydroxy-1-methyl- | X | X |
| II | 6.0 | 99.6 | 81.5(100) | 1-methyl-2,3-dihydro-3-hydroxypyrrol | - | X |
| III | 6.1 | 81.5 | 1-methylpyrrol | X | X | |
| IV | 6.4 | 115.7 | 70.0(100), 28.1 (23), 43.1(20) | X | X | |
| V | 15.3 | 131.9 | 86.1 (100), 69.1(45), 56.9(4) | X | X | |
| [M − H]− | ||||||
| 1 | 5.5 | 340.9 | 178.4(100) | Caffeoyl hexoside | X | X |
| 2 | 9.0 | 727.2 | 564.8(100), 341(14), 240.5(3) | Theviridoside dihexoside 1 | - | X |
| 3 | 11.2 | 763.3 | 727.0 (100), 484.9 (29), 383.1 (43), 340.7 (29), 240.6 (11) | Chlortheviridoside dihexoside derivative | - | X |
| 4 | 12.3 | 601.4 | 564.9 (100), 385.1 (73), 301 (27), 240.6 (4), 222.6 (15) | Chlortheviridoside hexoside derivative | X | X |
| 5 | 12.6 | 726.9 | 502.5(42), 385.1 (73), 240.5(3) | Theviridoside dihexoside 2 | X | X |
| 6 | 13.5 | 601.2 | 564.9 (100), 385.1 (13), 240.7 (5) | Chlortheviridoside hexoside derivative | X | X |
| 7 | 13.6 | 659.1 | 402.3(93), 254.9(78), 240.6(100) | Methyl-theviridoside aglycon theviridoside | X | - |
| 8 | 15.7 | 403.4 | 240.67(100), 222.60(21) | Theviridoside* | X | X |
| 9 | 15.9-16.2 | 600.9 | 565.0 (100), 240.8 (13) | Chlortheviridoside hexoside derivative | X | X |
| 10 | 16.1-16.3 | 565.5 | 240.65(100) | Theviridoside hexoside | X | X |
| 11 | 39.4 | 625.6 | 461.2(100), 315.3(3) | Dihydro acteoside | - | X |
| 12 | 41.3 | 769.6 | 607.3(100), 461.2(2) | Angoroside B | X | X |
| 13 | 41.7–42.1 | 623.6 | 477.1(4), 461.2(100), 315.2(2) | Acteoside | X | X |
| 14 | 43.8–45.5 | 623.5 | 461.1(100), 315.2(2), 178.6(3) | Isoacteoside | X | X |
| 15 | 51.3 | 515.7 | 352.9(100), 172.6(7) | Dicaffeoylquinic acid | - | X |
* Identity confirmed by NMR spectroscopy analysis—not detected.