| Literature DB >> 31898425 |
Soon Ok Lee1, Shinwon Lee2, Sohee Park1, Jeong Eun Lee1, Sun Hee Lee1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Recent data suggests the inoculum effect of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) against beta-lactam antibiotics and their association with functionality or genotypic variation of agr locus.Entities:
Keywords: Cefazolin; Inoculum effect; Quorum sensing; Staphylococcus aureus
Year: 2019 PMID: 31898425 PMCID: PMC6940372 DOI: 10.3947/ic.2019.51.4.376
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Infect Chemother ISSN: 1598-8112
Comparison of demographic, clinical, and microbiological characteristics according to the agr genotype of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia isolates
| Male | 90 (67.7%) | 10 (83.3%) | 23 (71.9%) | 9 (50.0%) | 0.243 | |
| Old age (Age≥65) | 76 (57.1%) | 3 (25.0%) | 16 (50%) | 8 (44.4%) | 0.149 | |
| Community onset | 79 (59.4%) | 5 (41.7%) | 19 (59.4%) | 9 (50.0%) | 0.596 | |
| Comorbidity | ||||||
| Malignancy | 17 (12.8%) | 1 (8.3%) | 3 (9.4%) | 5 (27.8%) | 0.264 | |
| Diabetes Mellitus | 32 (24.1%) | 2 (16.7%) | 5 (15.6%) | 3 (16.7%) | 0.663 | |
| Chronic Kidney Disease | 10 (7.5%) | 0 (0.0%) | 3 (9.4%) | 1 (5.6%) | 0.740 | |
| Chronic Liver Disease | 7 (5.3%) | 2 (16.7%) | 1 (3.1%) | 2 (11.1%) | 0.289 | |
| High (≥3) Charlson's Index | 87 (65.4%) | 5 (41.7%) | 17 (53.1%) | 8 (44.4%) | 0.124 | |
| High (≥2) SOFA score | 76 (57.1%) | 6 (50%) | 19 (59.4%) | 8 (44.4%) | 0.713 | |
| High (≥2) Pitt score | 22 (16.1%) | 1 (8.3%) | 5 (15.6%) | 2 (11.1%) | 0.838 | |
| Site of Infection | ||||||
| Skin, Soft tissue | 18 (13.5%) | 2 (16.7%) | 8 (25.0%) | 2 (11.1%) | 0.409 | |
| Abscess, deep seated | 22 (16.5%) | 0 (0.0%) | 7 (21.9%) | 1 (5.6%) | 0.196 | |
| Bone & Joint | 27 (20.3%) | 0 (0.0%) | 8 (25%) | 1 (5.6%) | 0.116 | |
| Lung | 16 (12%) | 3 (25%) | 3 (9.4%) | 4 (22.2%) | 0.351 | |
| Infective endocarditis | 5 (3.8%) | 1 (8.3%) | 1 (3.1%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0.687 | |
| Primary bacteremia | 37 (27.8%) | 6 (50%) | 6 (18.8%) | 7 (38.9%) | 0.160 | |
| 45 (33.8%) | 2 (16.7%) | 18 (56.2%) | 2 (11.1%) | 0.005 | ||
| <0.001 | ||||||
| A | 8 (6.0%) | 1 (8.3%) | 13 (40.6%) | 5 (27.8%) | ||
| B | 53 (39.8%) | 2 (16.7%) | 1 (3.1%) | 1 (5.6%) | ||
| C | 43 (32.3%) | 4 (33.3%) | 12 (37.5%) | 8 (44.4%) | ||
| D | 5 (3.8%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | ||
| 24 (18.0%) | 5 (41.7%) | 6 (18.8%) | 4 (22.2%) | |||
| Cefazolin InE | 7 (5.3%) | 1 (8.3%) | 14 (43.8%) | 1 (5.6%) | <0.001 | |
| Ampicillin/sulbactam InE | 90 (67.7%) | 6 (50.0%) | 24 (75.0%) | 10 (55.6%) | 0.313 | |
| Piperacillin/tazobactam InE | 89 (66.9%) | 5 (41.7%) | 23 (71.9%) | 7 (38.9%) | 0.032 | |
| Erythromycin Resistance | 4 (3.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 18 (56.2%) | 2 (11.1%) | <0.001 | |
| Clindamycin Resistance | 3 (2.3%) | 0 (0.0%) | 14 (43.8%) | 1 (5.6%) | <0.001 | |
| Ciprofloxacin Resistance | 6 (4.5%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 1 (5.6%) | 0.539 | |
| High dose Gentamicin Resistance | 20 (15.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 10 (31.2%) | 3 (16.7%) | 0.059 | |
| High (≥2) Vancomycin MIC (BMD) | 4 (3.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0.593 | |
| High (≥2) Vancomycin MIC (E-test) | 5 (3.8%) | 0 (0.0%) | 2 (6.2%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0.619 | |
| High (≥4) Linezolid MIC (BMD) | 4 (3.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 2 (6.2%) | 1 (5.6%) | 0.698 | |
| High (≥3) Linezolid MIC (E-test) | 2 (1.5%) | 1 (8.3%) | 0 (0.0%) | 1 (5.6%) | 0.228 | |
SOFA, sequential organ failure assessment; InE, inoculum effect; MIC, minimum inhibitory concentration; BMD, broth microdilution.
Comparison of demographic, clinical and microbiological characteristics according to the functionality of agr locus of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia
| Functional | Dysfunctional | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.005 | ||||
| Type I | 88 (68.8%) | 45 (67.2%) | ||
| Type II | 10 (7.8%) | 2 (3.0%) | ||
| Type III | 14 (10.9%) | 18 (26.9%) | ||
| Type IV | 16 (12.5%) | 2 (3.0%) | ||
| 0.034 | ||||
| A | 14 (10.9%) | 13 (19.4%) | ||
| B | 35 (27.3%) | 22 (32.8%) | ||
| C | 50 (39.1%) | 17 (25.4%) | ||
| D | 1 (0.8%) | 4 (6.0%) | ||
| 28 (21.9%) | 11 (16.4%) | |||
| Cefazolin InE | 13 (10.2%) | 10 (14.9%) | 0.455 | |
| Ampicillin/sulbactam InE | 82 (64.1%) | 48 (71.6%) | 0.365 | |
| Piperacillin/tazobactam InE | 78 (60.9%) | 46 (68.7%) | 0.364 | |
| Erythromycin Resistance | 13 (10.2%) | 11 (16.4%) | 0.301 | |
| Clindamycin Resistance | 9 (7.0%) | 9 (13.4%) | 0.228 | |
| Ciprofloxacin Resistance | 3 (2.3%) | 4 (6.0%) | 0.375 | |
| High dose Gentamicin Resistance | 20 (15.6%) | 13 (19.4%) | 0.640 | |
| High (≥2) Vancomycin MIC | 3 (2.3%) | 1 (1.5%) | >0.999 | |
| High (≥2) Vancomycin MIC (E-test) | 5 (3.9%) | 2 (3.0%) | >0.999 | |
| High (≥4) Linezolid MIC | 4 (3.1%) | 3 (4.5%) | 0.939 | |
| High (≥3) Linezolid MIC (E-test) | 3 (2.3%) | 1 (1.5%) | >0.999 | |
SOFA, sequential organ failure assessment; InE, inoculum effect; MIC, minimum inhibitory concentration.
Figure 1(A) Proportion of cefazolin inoculum effect (CIE) positivity, (B) blaZ genotype, (C) erythromycin resistance between agr type III and non agr type III methicillin susceptible Staphylococcus aureus.
Figure 2(A) Proportion of cefazolin inoculum effect positivity according to the agr genotype, (B) erythromycin resistance, (C) agr functionality in subgroup analysis among Methicillin susceptible Staphylococcus aureus with type A blaZ gene.