| Literature DB >> 31888572 |
Tao Lu1, Hong Pu2, Kui-de Li1, Jie Mei3, Meng-Wei Huang3, Shao-Yu Wang4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The incidence of PAS disorders increased rapidly in recent years, and introvoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) MRI has been applied in the assessment of placenta. The study aims to investigate whether the parameters from IVIM can be used to differentiate patients with PAS disorders complicating placenta previa and secondly to differentiate different categories of PAS disorders.Entities:
Keywords: PAS disorders MRI placenta IVIM
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31888572 PMCID: PMC6937691 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-019-2676-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ISSN: 1471-2393 Impact factor: 3.007
Fig. 1Flowchart of the study design
Fig. 2ROI of the placenta
Physical and sociodemographic features of patients studied
| Patients without PAS disoders | Patients with PAS disoders | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Number | 24 (24.24%) | 75 (75.76%) | |
| Age (years) | 31.88 ± 3.81 | 31.93 ± 4.48 | 0.147 |
| Less than 35 | 20 (20.20%) | 51 (51.52%) | |
| 35 or older | 4 (4.04%) | 24 (24.24%) | |
| Gestational age At examination (weeks) | 33.5 (4) | 34 (4) | 0.825 |
| Gestational age At the time of delivery (weeks) | 37 (2) | 37 (1) | 0.241 |
| Number of Previous caesarean Section | |||
| 0 | 11 (11.11%) | 15 (15.15%) | |
| 1 | 12 (12.12%) | 46 (46.46%) | |
| 2 or more | 1 (1.01%) | 14 (14.14%) | 0.021 |
| Previous uterine Dilation and Curettage | |||
| No | 2 (2.02%) | 16 (16.16%) | |
| Yes | 22 (22.22%) | 59 (59.60%) | 0.226 |
| Blood lost (ml) | 500 (200) | 800 (600) | 0.001 |
| Transfusion | 6 (13.64%) | 12 (27.27%) | 0.003 |
| No | 21 (21.21%) | 40 (40.40%) | |
| Yes | 3 (3.03%) | 35 (35.35%) | |
| Amount of transfusion (ml) | 0 (0) | 0 (800) | 0.002 |
| f (%) | 29.39 (5.59) | 34.12 (9.8) | 0.019 |
| D (10−3 mm2/s) | 1.68 (0.13) | 1.7 (0.13) | 0.915 |
| D*(10−3 mm2/s) | 20.37 (10.22) | 24.84 (8.94) | 0.044 |
Fig. 3variation of f value. Box plot represented the distribution of f value in patients without PAS and with PAS
Multiple comparsion between different groups of three parameters (n = 44)
| Group | n | f (%) | D(10− 3 mm2/s) | D*(10− 3 mm2/s) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patients without PAS disorders | 24 (24.24%) | 29.39 (5.59) | 1.68 (0.13) | 20.37 (10.22) |
| Patients with Placenta accreta | 16 (16.16%) | 37.73 (18.17) | 1.70 (0.23) | 24.84 (14.35) |
| Patients with Placenta increta | 51 (51.52%) | 32.32 (8.56) | 1.70 (0.12) | 23.35 (9.19) |
| Patients with Placenta percreta | 8 (8.08) | 36.01 (13.27) | 1.66 (0.11) | 29.31 (7.26) |
| 0.016 | 0.794 | 0.160 |
Fig. 4variation of f value. Box plot represented the distribution of f value in patients with placenta accreta, increta, percreta and without PAS