| Literature DB >> 33549925 |
Dimitra Flouri1, Jack R T Darby2, Stacey L Holman2, Sunthara R Perumal3, Anna L David4, Janna L Morrison2, Andrew Melbourne5.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Novel imaging measurements of placental development are difficult to validate due to the invasive nature of gold-standard procedures. Animal studies have been important in validation of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) measurements in invasive preclinical studies, as they allow for controlled experiments and analysis of multiple time-points during pregnancy. This study characterises the longitudinal diffusion and perfusion properties of sheep placentomes using MRI, measurements that are required for future validation studies.Entities:
Keywords: Anisotropy; Diffusion; IVIM; Placenta; Relaxometry
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33549925 PMCID: PMC7611430 DOI: 10.1016/j.placenta.2021.01.017
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Placenta ISSN: 0143-4004 Impact factor: 3.481
Summary of placentome total number, proportion and average volume for each category estimated from MRI for all pregnancies.
| Placentomes | Total Number | Proportion (%) | Average Volume (cm3) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 109-111 d | 139-141 d | 109-111 d | 139-141 d | 109-111 d | 139-141 d | |
| Type A | 445 | 55 | 78.2 | 30.1 | 2432 | 2040 |
| Type B | 124 | 89 | 21.8 | 48.6 | 5607 | 4755 |
| Type C/D | 0 | 39 | 0 | 21.3 | 0 | 6226 |
Fig. 1Example of MR images illustrating morphological classification of placentomes in a single sheep at 109–111 days GA (A) and 139–141 days GA (B).
Fig. 2Morphological placentome classification results. Bar plots show the proportion of each placentome type. Each plot compares MRI classification results at mid and late gestational age with the post-mortem (PM) gold-standard data.
Fig. 3Histograms showing results estimated from MRI data at mid and late gestation: (A) total placentome number over all singleton pregnancies, (B) mean placentome volume, (C) total placentome number for each sheep, (D) percentage of placentome number over all singleton pregnancies, (E) percentage of placentome volume and (F) placentome volume for each sheep.
Left-to-Right: Average MRI parameters derived over all singleton pregnancies at two gestational ages for all placentomes. Two-sample t-test was performed to compare the MRI-derived parameters. Significant differences are (P < 0.05) are shown in bold. Average MRI parameters of the three placentome types at two gestational ages. Results are presented as mean± standard deviation (sd).
| MRI Parameter | All Placentomes Mean ± sd | Type A | Type B | Type C/D | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 109-111d | 139-141d | 109-111d | 139-141d | 109-111d | 139-141d | 109-111d | 139-141d | |
| ADC (mm2s−1 | 0.0016 ± 5e−4 |
| 0.0017 ± 5e−4 | 0.0015 ± 5e−4 | 0.0015 ± 4e−4 | 0.0013 ± 5e−4 | 0 | 0.0012 ± 5e−4 |
| T2 (ms) | 152.2 ± 58.1 |
| 158.5 ± 48.7 | 141.1 ± 70.4 | 141.3 ± 58.5 | 130.3 ± 53.3 | 0 | 130.0 ± 55.2 |
| FA (b = 50 s.mm−2) | 0.762 ± 0.22 |
| 0.769 ± 0.23 |
| 0.756 ± 0.23 |
| 0 | 0.902 ± 0.17 |
| FA (b = 100 s.mm-2) | 0.535 ± 0.22 |
| 0.542 ± 0.23 |
| 0.527 ± 0.21 |
| 0 | 0.780 ± 0.23 |
| FA (all b-values) | 0.479 ± 0.21 |
| 0.496 ± 0.22 |
| 0.484 ± 0.19 |
| 0 | 0.749 ± 0.23 |
|
| 0.223 ± 0.12 |
| 0.224 ± 0.22 |
| 0.233 ± 0.11 |
| 0 | 0.258 ± 0.16 |
Fig. 4Boxplots summarising results of changes in MRI parameters with stage of gestation for each placentome type in all singleton pregnancies. Each plot shows the median as well as the 25th and 75th percentile.