| Literature DB >> 31885350 |
Chunhui Yang1, Yiqing Qiu1, Jiali Wang1, Yina Wu1, Xiaowu Hu1, Xi Wu1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to analyze the risk factors of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) after deep brain stimulation (DBS) for idiopathic Parkinson's disease (PD).Entities:
Keywords: Parkinson’s disease; deep brain stimulation; electrode; hypertension; intracranial hemorrhage; motor function; neurological symptom
Year: 2019 PMID: 31885350 PMCID: PMC7251548 DOI: 10.1177/0300060519856747
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Int Med Res ISSN: 0300-0605 Impact factor: 1.671
Demographic information of the patients.
| All patients | Hemorrhagic patients | Non-hemorrhagic patients | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Males | 195 | 10 | 185 | 0.026 |
| Females | 157 | 1 | 156 | |
| Hypertension | 103 | 8 | 95 | 0.003 |
| Disease duration (years) | 10.12 ± 3.38 | 12.91 ± 6.24 | 10.03 ± 4.24 | >0.05 |
| Age (years) | 62.22 ± 6.08 | 64.91 ± 4.30 | 62.17 ± 7.93 | >0.05 |
| Preoperative improvement rate | 52.51% ± 13.43% | 54.32% ± 15.38% | 51.52% ± 14.24% | >0.05 |
| Electrode number | 686 | 13 | 673 | |
| Single side | 18 | 1 | 17 | |
| Bilateral side | 334 | 10 | 324 | |
| STN | 325 (633 electrodes) | 9 | 316 | >0.05 |
| GPi | 27 (53 electrodes) | 2 | 25 | |
| Motor function | ||||
| UPDRS-III score postoperatively | 55.62 ± 12.32 | 60.73 ± 16.95 | 55.45 ± 15.81 | >0.05 |
| UPDRS-III score during on time | 26.30 ± 9.10 | 27.27 ± 8.09 | 26.26 ± 11.80 | >0.05 |
| Non-motor function | ||||
| MMSE | 27.02 ± 11.34 | |||
| MoCA | 24.06 ± 3.60 | |||
| NMSQ | 17.3 ± 4.8 | |||
| HAMD | 20.26 ± 5.8 |
STN: subthalamic nucleus; GPi: internal globus pallidus; UPDRS: Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale; MMSE: Mini-mental State Examination; MoCA: Montreal Cognitive Assessment; NMSQ: Non-motor Symptom Questionnaire; HAMD: Hamilton depression scale.
Clinical data of patients who were treated in the STN.
| No. | Sex | Age (years) | Course | Hypertension | Target | Immediatehemorrhage | Detection method | Bleedingposition | Pattern of hemorrhage | Hemorrhagic volume | Neurologicalsymptoms | Preferentialside | ElectrodeAdjustment | Hemorrhage index |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | M | 64 | 25 | Y | STN | No ICH, MRI | CT, 6th day | Left frontallobe + tip | 2.19 × 2.62-cm high-density shadow | 6.5 + 0.5 mL | Headache, loss of consciousness | L | N | 3 |
| 2 | M | 64 | 12 | Y | STN | No ICH, MRI | CT, 5th day | Left frontallobe + tip | Small high-density shadow | 4.8 + 0.32 mL | None | R | Y (z axis) | 2 |
| 3 | M | 68 | 7 | Y | STN | No ICH, MRI | MRI, 6th d | Left frontal lobe + tip | 2.7 × 2.2-cm high-density shadow | 10.3 + 3.2 mL | None | L | N | 3 |
| 4 | M | 73 | 9 | N | STN | No ICH, MRI | CT, 5th d | Right basal ganglia | Small hematoma in right basal ganglia | 1.02 mL | Delirium | R | N | 1 |
| 5 | M | 62 | 19 | Y | STN | No ICH, MRI | CT, 6th d | Left frontal lobe+right tip | Irregular peri-electrode High-density shadow | (R) 1 + (L)10.8 mL | R limb weakness | L | N | 2 & 4 |
| 6 | F | 68 | 12 | Y | STN | No ICH, MRI | CT, 5th d | Right frontal lobe + tip | Right cerebral horns Hematoma | 2.42 + 0.54 mL | Headache | R | N | 2 |
| 7 | M | 68 | 20 | Y | STN | No ICH, MRI | CT, 3rd d | Bilateral puncture tract | Small hemorrhage in bilateral puncture tracts | (R) 2 + (L)0.4 mL | Drowsy | R | N | 2 & 2 |
| 8 | M | 66 | 7 | N | STN | No ICH, MRI | CT, 3rd d | Left frontal lobe + tip | Left frontal hematoma | 2.94 + 0.1 mL | None | R | N | 1 |
| 9 | M | 62 | 7 | N | STN | No ICH, MRI | CT, 6th d | Left frontal lobe | Small peri-electrode hemorrhage and edema | 2.7 mL | Drowsy | L | Y (y axis) | 2 |
M: male; F: female; Y: yes; N: no; STN: subthalamic nucleus; ICH: intracranial hemorrhage; MRI: magnetic resonance imaging; CT: computed tomography; d: day; R: right; L: left.
Improvement rate at the 2-year follow-up in 352 patients.
| Preoperative baseline(med-off) | Postoperative baseline (med-off, IPG-off) | 3 months(med-off, IPG-on) | 6 months (IPG-on, med-off) | 1 year(IPG-on, med-off) | 2 years(IPG-on, med-off) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ICH group (n = 10) | 60.73 ± 16.95 | 50.18 ± 13.41 | 26.91 ± 9.33 | 26.36 ± 7.30 | 27.73 ± 9.55 | 29.64 ± 8.99 |
| Non-ICH group (n = 337) | 55.45 ± 15.81 | 54.64 ± 14.28 | 26.23 ± 9.01 | 25.40 ± 7.91 | 25.13 ± 7.85 | 27.18 ± 7.33 |
| P value | 0.518 | 0.367 | 0.588 | 0.528 | 0.243 | 0.162 |
med-off: no drug use; IPG-off/on: implantable pulse generator off/on; ICH: intracranial hemorrhage.
Figure 1.Comparison of the hemorrhage index between the preferred side and non-preferred side. The hemorrhage index in the preferred side was significantly higher than that in the non-preferred side (paired t test).
Figure 2.Computed tomographic and magnetic resonance imaging of intracranial hemorrhage in 11 patients.