Literature DB >> 21739410

Minimizing brain shift during functional neurosurgical procedures - a simple burr hole technique that can decrease CSF loss and intracranial air.

V A Coenen1, A Abdel-Rahman, J McMaster, N Bogod, C R Honey.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Exact stereotactic placement of deep brain stimulation electrodes during functional stereotactic neurosurgical procedures can be impeded by intraoperative brain shift. Brain shift has been shown to correlate with the amount of intracranial (subdural) air detected on early postoperative imaging studies. We report a simple burr hole technique that reduces the loss of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and has the potential to significantly reduce the amount of postoperative intracranial air.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 16 patients were studied with half (group 2) receiving the burr hole technique designed to seal the CSF space and thereby reducing CSF loss. The other 8 patients (group 1) received the standard burr hole technique. The 2 groups were of similar age, gender, diagnosis (Parkinson's disease, n=14; cervical dystonia n=2), and surgical targets. All patients received bilateral electrodes either in the subthalamic nucleus (STN, n=14) or in the globus pallidum internus (GPi, n=2) avoiding transventricular trajectories. Early postoperative 3-dimensional computed tomography (3D CT) was used to check for possible bleeding, DBS lead location, and the amount of intracranial air. Intracranial air was assessed manually in a volumetric slice-by-slice approach in the individual postoperative CT and the groups compared by t-test.
RESULTS: Group 2 showed significantly lower postoperative intracranial air volumes (4.86 ± 4.35cc) as compared to group 1 (27.59 ± 17.80 cc, p=0.0083*). The duration of surgery, however, was significantly longer for group 1 (435 ± 56.05 min) as compared to group 2 (316 ± 34.79 min,p=0.00015*).The time span between the conclusion of the operation and postoperative 3DCT was similar for both groups.
CONCLUSION: This new and simple burr hole technique was associated with a significant reduction in postoperative intracranial air. Reduction of intracranial air will ultimately reduce brain shift. That total operation time does not influence intracranial air is discussed as well as the limitations of this pilot series. In the authors' opinion, this straightforward and cost-effective technique has the potential to reduce brain shift and to increase DBS placement accuracy during functional stereotactic neurosurgical procedures performed in the seated or half-sitting position. A larger more standardized patient series is necessary to substantiate the findings. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21739410     DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1279748

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cent Eur Neurosurg        ISSN: 1868-4904


  13 in total

1.  Electrophysiologic Validation of Diffusion Tensor Imaging Tractography during Deep Brain Stimulation Surgery.

Authors:  V A Coenen; C Jenkner; C R Honey; B Mädler
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Pneumocephalus in subthalamic deep brain stimulation for Parkinson's disease: a comparison of two different surgical techniques considering factors conditioning brain shift and target precision.

Authors:  Massimo Piacentino; Giacomo Beggio; Oriela Rustemi; Giampaolo Zambon; Manuela Pilleri; Fabio Raneri
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 2.216

3.  Stereotactic Placement of Intratumoral Catheters for Continuous Infusion Delivery of Herpes Simplex Virus -1 G207 in Pediatric Malignant Supratentorial Brain Tumors.

Authors:  Joshua D Bernstock; Zachary Wright; Asim K Bag; Florian Gessler; George Yancey Gillespie; James M Markert; Gregory K Friedman; James M Johnston
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2018-11-24       Impact factor: 2.104

4.  Factors Influencing Electrode Position and Bending of the Proximal Lead in Deep Brain Stimulation for Movement Disorders.

Authors:  Jacob Niederer; Rémi Patriat; Oren Rosenberg; Tara Palnitkar; David Darrow; Michael C Park; Lauren Schrock; Lynn E Eberly; Noam Harel
Journal:  Stereotact Funct Neurosurg       Date:  2020-06-02       Impact factor: 1.875

Review 5.  Techniques for pneumocephalus and brain shift reduction in DBS surgery: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Giacomo Beggio; Fabio Raneri; Oriela Rustemi; Alba Scerrati; Giampaolo Zambon; Massimo Piacentino
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2020-01-02       Impact factor: 3.042

6.  ESM-CT: a precise method for localization of DBS electrodes in CT images.

Authors:  Mikhail Milchenko; Abraham Z Snyder; Meghan C Campbell; Joshua L Dowling; Keith M Rich; Lindsey M Brier; Joel S Perlmutter; Scott A Norris
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 2.390

7.  Does trajectory matter? A study looking into the relationship of trajectory with target engagement and error accommodation in subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation.

Authors:  David Anthony Steel; Surajit Basu
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2017-03-30       Impact factor: 2.216

8.  The Effectiveness of the Stereotactic Burr Hole Technique for Deep Brain Stimulation.

Authors:  Keisuke Toyoda; Eiichirou Urasaki; Tetsuya Umeno; Waka Sakai; Akiko Nagaishi; Shunya Nakane; Takayasu Fukudome; Yuzo Yamakawa
Journal:  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 1.742

Review 9.  Microgravity environment and compensatory: Decompensatory phases for intracranial hypertension form new perspectives to explain mechanism underlying communicating hydrocephalus and its related disorders.

Authors:  Zamzuri Idris; Muzaimi Mustapha; Jafri M Abdullah
Journal:  Asian J Neurosurg       Date:  2014-01

10.  Error Analysis and Some Suggestions on Animal Stereotactic Experiment from Inaccuracy of Rhesus Macaques Atlas.

Authors:  Guan-Yu Zhu; Ying-Chuan Chen; Lin Shi; An-Chao Yang; Yin Jiang; Xin Zhang; Jian-Guo Zhang
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 2.628

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.