Literature DB >> 20802207

Motor and cognitive outcome in patients with Parkinson's disease 8 years after subthalamic implants.

Alfonso Fasano1, Luigi M Romito, Antonio Daniele, Carla Piano, Massimiliano Zinno, Anna Rita Bentivoglio, Alberto Albanese.   

Abstract

Deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus represents the most important innovation for treatment of advanced Parkinson's disease. Prospective studies have shown that although the beneficial effects of this procedure are maintained at 5 years, axial motor features and cognitive decline may occur in the long term after the implants. In order to address some unsolved questions raised by previous studies, we evaluated a series of 20 consecutive patients who received continuous stimulation for 8 years. The overall motor improvement reported at 5 years (55.5% at Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale-motor part, P < 0.001 compared with baseline) was only partly retained 3 years later (39%, P < 0.001, compared with baseline; -16.5%, P < 0.01, compared with 5 years), with differential effects on motor features: speech did not improve and postural stability worsened (P < 0.05). The preoperative levodopa equivalent daily dose was reduced by 58.2% at 5 years and by 60.3% at 8 years. In spite of subtle worsening of motor features, a dramatic impairment in functional state (-56.6% at Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale-Activities of Daily Living, P < 0.01) emerged after the fifth year of stimulation. The present study did not reveal a predictive value of preoperative levodopa response, whereas few single features at baseline (such as gait and postural stability motor scores and the preoperative levodopa equivalent daily dose) could predict long-term motor outcome. A decline in verbal fluency (slightly more pronounced than after 5 years) was detected after 8 years. A significant but slight decline in tasks of abstract reasoning, episodic memory and executive function was also found. One patient had developed dementia at 5 years with further progression at 8 years. Executive dysfunction correlated significantly with postural stability, suggesting interplay between axial motor deterioration and cognition. Eight years after surgery, no significant change was observed on scales assessing depression or anxiety when compared with baseline. At 8 years, there was no significant increase of side-effects when compared with 5-year follow-up. In conclusion, deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus is a safe procedure with regard to cognitive and behavioural morbidity over long-term follow-up. However, the global benefit partly decreases later in the course of the disease, due to progression of Parkinson's disease and the appearance of medication- and stimulation-resistant symptoms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20802207     DOI: 10.1093/brain/awq221

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain        ISSN: 0006-8950            Impact factor:   13.501


  121 in total

1.  Randomized trial of deep brain stimulation for Parkinson disease: thirty-six-month outcomes.

Authors:  Frances M Weaver; Kenneth A Follett; Matthew Stern; Ping Luo; Crystal L Harris; Kwan Hur; William J Marks; Johannes Rothlind; Oren Sagher; Claudia Moy; Rajesh Pahwa; Kim Burchiel; Penelope Hogarth; Eugene C Lai; John E Duda; Kathryn Holloway; Ali Samii; Stacy Horn; Jeff M Bronstein; Gatana Stoner; Philip A Starr; Richard Simpson; Gordon Baltuch; Antonio De Salles; Grant D Huang; Domenic J Reda
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 9.910

Review 2.  Late-stage Parkinson disease.

Authors:  Miguel Coelho; Joaquim J Ferreira
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 42.937

Review 3.  Mechanisms of deep brain stimulation.

Authors:  Todd M Herrington; Jennifer J Cheng; Emad N Eskandar
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Long-term cognitive outcome of bilateral subthalamic deep brain stimulation in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Han-Joon Kim; Beom S Jeon; Sun Ha Paek; Kyoung-Min Lee; Ji-Young Kim; Jee-Young Lee; Hee Jin Kim; Ji Young Yun; Young Eun Kim; Hui-Jun Yang; Gwanhee Ehm
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 4.849

5.  Nonmotor outcomes in Parkinson's disease: is deep brain stimulation better than dopamine replacement therapy?

Authors:  Rupam Borgohain; Rukmini Mridula Kandadai; Afshan Jabeen; Meena A Kannikannan
Journal:  Ther Adv Neurol Disord       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 6.570

6.  Targeting the brain: considerations in 332 consecutive patients treated by deep brain stimulation (DBS) for severe neurological diseases.

Authors:  Angelo Franzini; Roberto Cordella; Giuseppe Messina; Carlo Efisio Marras; Luigi Michele Romito; Alberto Albanese; Michele Rizzi; Nardo Nardocci; Giovanna Zorzi; Edvin Zekaj; Flavio Villani; Massimo Leone; Orsola Gambini; Giovanni Broggi
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 3.307

Review 7.  The role of the subthalamic nucleus in cognition.

Authors:  David B Weintraub; Kareem A Zaghloul
Journal:  Rev Neurosci       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 4.353

Review 8.  Subthalamic deep brain stimulation and levodopa in Parkinson's disease: a meta-analysis of combined effects.

Authors:  Joaquin A Vizcarra; Miguel Situ-Kcomt; Carlo Alberto Artusi; Andrew P Duker; Leonardo Lopiano; Michael S Okun; Alberto J Espay; Aristide Merola
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2018-06-16       Impact factor: 4.849

9.  Subthalamic Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation Modulates 2 Distinct Neurocircuits.

Authors:  Lunhao Shen; Changqing Jiang; Catherine S Hubbard; Jianxun Ren; Changgeng He; Danhong Wang; Louisa Dahmani; Yi Guo; Yiming Liu; Shujun Xu; Fangang Meng; Jianguo Zhang; Hesheng Liu; Luming Li
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2020-10-13       Impact factor: 10.422

10.  [Deep brain stimulation for Parkinson's disease: timing and patient selection].

Authors:  R Erasmi; G Deuschl; K Witt
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 1.214

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.