Literature DB >> 10853072

Do microelectrode techniques increase accuracy or decrease risks in pallidotomy and deep brain stimulation? A critical review of the literature.

M I Hariz1, H Fodstad.   

Abstract

Several recent publications have stated that the use of microelectrode recording (MER) during pallidotomy or deep brain stimulation (DBS) contributes to decreasing risks and side effects of surgery, and that such a technique is a prerequisite for minimizing lesion size and for accurate placement of the stereotactic lesion or the DBS electrode. To evaluate the consistency of these statements, we reviewed hundreds of papers and congress reports on MER- and non-MER-guided procedures published since 1992. This review showed that MER groups published more often than non-MER groups. While side effects of surgery were not uncommon in both groups, the rate of severe complications, such as hematoma, and mortality appeared to be higher when microelectrodes were used, both in ablative surgery and in DBS procedures. Besides, the nonaccurate placement of lesions or DBS electrodes, as assessed on published MRI figures, was not uncommon in MER publications. Lesion volume was, when reported, not different in both techniques. The electrical parameters of stimulation of implanted electrodes in the thalamic ventral intermediate (Vim) nucleus for treatment of tremor were higher in MER-guided surgery. The available literature suggests that MER techniques may increase the risks of surgery without enhancing its accuracy, compared to MRI-based macrostimulation techniques. To date, there is no randomized trial by one and the same group on the use of micro- versus macroelectrodes in surgery for movement disorders. A prerequisite for such a trial in the future must imply that the investigators have an equal nonprejudiced attitude towards, and equal confidence and experience in, either technique. Since such a prerequisite does not exist so far in the functional stereotactic community, a critical and comparative study of the available literature remains the only way to evaluate the pros and cons of either technique, in terms of targeting accuracy and surgical complications. Copyright 2000 S. Karger AG, Basel

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10853072     DOI: 10.1159/000029720

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stereotact Funct Neurosurg        ISSN: 1011-6125            Impact factor:   1.875


  16 in total

1.  MRI directed bilateral stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus in patients with Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  N K Patel; P Plaha; K O'Sullivan; R McCarter; P Heywood; S S Gill
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 10.154

2.  Multicenter study report: electrophysiological monitoring procedures for subthalamic deep brain stimulation surgery in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Sara Marceglia; Simona Mrakic-Sposta; Giorgio Tommasi; Luigi Bartolomei; Camillo Foresti; Franco Valzania; Salvatore Galati; Alessandro Stefani; Filippo Tamma; Alberto Priori
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2010-04-23       Impact factor: 3.307

3.  [Neurosurgical standards in deep brain stimulation : consensus recommendations of the German Deep Brain Stimulation Association].

Authors:  J Voges; K Kiening; J K Krauss; G Nikkhah; J Vesper
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.214

Review 4.  The deep brain stimulation of the pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus: towards a new stereotactic neurosurgery.

Authors:  Paolo Mazzone; Stefano Sposato; Angelo Insola; Eugenio Scarnati
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2011-02-12       Impact factor: 3.575

5.  Does the Use of Intraoperative Microelectrode Recording Influence the Final Location of Lead Implants in the Ventral Intermediate Nucleus for Deep Brain Stimulation?

Authors:  Sujan Reddy; Albert Fenoy; Erin Furr-Stimming; Mya Schiess; Raja Mehanna
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 3.847

Review 6.  Neuropsychological sequelae of subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation in Parkinson's disease: a critical review.

Authors:  Steven Paul Woods; Julie A Fields; Alexander I Tröster
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 7.444

7.  Brain penetration effects of microelectrodes and DBS leads in STN or GPi.

Authors:  J M Mann; K D Foote; C W Garvan; H H Fernandez; C E Jacobson; R L Rodriguez; I U Haq; M S Siddiqui; I A Malaty; T Morishita; C J Hass; M S Okun
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2009-02-22       Impact factor: 10.154

Review 8.  The treatment of movement disorders by deep brain stimulation.

Authors:  Hong Yu; Joseph S Neimat
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 7.620

9.  Identification of target areas for deep brain stimulation in human basal ganglia substructures based on median nerve sensory evoked potential criteria.

Authors:  F Klostermann; J Vesper; G Curio
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 10.154

Review 10.  Identification and management of deep brain stimulation intra- and postoperative urgencies and emergencies.

Authors:  Takashi Morishita; Kelly D Foote; Adam P Burdick; Yoichi Katayama; Takamitsu Yamamoto; Steven J Frucht; Michael S Okun
Journal:  Parkinsonism Relat Disord       Date:  2009-11-05       Impact factor: 4.891

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.