Literature DB >> 31868948

Quantitative imaging of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) graft demonstrates longitudinal compositional changes and relationships with clinical outcomes at 2 years after ACL reconstruction.

Drew A Lansdown1, Weiyuan Xiao1, Alan L Zhang1, Christina R Allen1, Brian T Feeley1, Xiaojuan Li2, Sharmila Majumdar3, C Benjamin Ma1.   

Abstract

T1 ρ and T2 magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may allow for a noninvasive assessment of ligamentization after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. We hypothesized that ACL graft T1 ρ and T2 relaxation times would decrease over time, that T1 ρ and T2 relaxation times would be inversely correlated with Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores (KOOS), and that T1 ρ and T2 values would be lower for autograft relative to allograft reconstruction. Thirty-nine patients (age: 30.5 ± 8.2 years) were followed prospectively after ACL reconstruction with hamstring autograft (N = 27) or soft-tissue allograft (N = 12). Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and KOOS surveys were completed at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months after surgery. ACL graft was segmented to define T1 ρ and T2 relaxation times. Relaxation times were compared between time points with ANOVA tests. Log-transformed autograft and allograft relaxation times were compared with the Student t tests. The relationship between KOOS and relaxation times at 24 months was investigated with Spearman's rank correlation. ACL graft T1 ρ relaxation times were significantly higher at 6 months relative to 12 months (P = .042), 24 months (P < .001), and 36 months (P < .001). ACL graft T2 relaxation times were significantly higher at 6 months relative to 12 months (P = .036), 24 months (P < .001), and 36 months (P < .001). T1 ρ and T2 relaxation times were significantly lower for autograft reconstruction vs allograft reconstruction at 24 months postreconstruction. Two-year KOOS Sports, Pain, and Symptoms were significantly inversely correlated with T1 ρ and T2 relaxation times. T1 ρ and T2 sequences may offer a noninvasive method for monitoring ACL graft maturation that correlates with patient-reported knee function after ACL reconstruction.
© 2019 Orthopaedic Research Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ACL; clinical outcomes; diagnostic imaging; knee; ligament; proteoglycans; surgical repair

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31868948      PMCID: PMC7433779          DOI: 10.1002/jor.24572

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Res        ISSN: 0736-0266            Impact factor:   3.494


  29 in total

Review 1.  The "ligamentization" process in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: what happens to the human graft? A systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Steven Claes; Peter Verdonk; Ramses Forsyth; Johan Bellemans
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2011-04-22       Impact factor: 6.202

2.  Abnormal tibial position is correlated to early degenerative changes one year following ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Musa Zaid; Drew Lansdown; Favian Su; Valentina Pedoia; Lauren Tufts; Sarah Rizzo; Richard B Souza; Xiaojuan Li; C Benjamin Ma
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 3.494

3.  Change in KOOS and WOMAC Scores in a Young Athletic Population With and Without Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury.

Authors:  Ivan J Antosh; Steven J Svoboda; Karen Y Peck; E'Stephan J Garcia; Kenneth L Cameron
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 6.202

Review 4.  Return to play following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Michael B Ellman; Seth L Sherman; Brian Forsythe; Robert F LaPrade; Brian J Cole; Bernard R Bach
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 3.020

5.  Cartilage T1ρ and T2 relaxation times: longitudinal reproducibility and variations using different coils, MR systems and sites.

Authors:  X Li; V Pedoia; D Kumar; J Rivoire; C Wyatt; D Lansdown; K Amano; N Okazaki; D Savic; M F Koff; J Felmlee; S L Williams; S Majumdar
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 6.576

Review 6.  Should Return to Sport be Delayed Until 2 Years After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction? Biological and Functional Considerations.

Authors:  Christopher V Nagelli; Timothy E Hewett
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 11.136

7.  T2 * MR relaxometry and ligament volume are associated with the structural properties of the healing ACL.

Authors:  Alison M Biercevicz; Martha M Murray; Edward G Walsh; Danny L Miranda; Jason T Machan; Braden C Fleming
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2013-12-16       Impact factor: 3.494

8.  MRI volume and signal intensity of ACL graft predict clinical, functional, and patient-oriented outcome measures after ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Alison M Biercevicz; Matthew R Akelman; Paul D Fadale; Michael J Hulstyn; Robert M Shalvoy; Gary J Badger; Glenn A Tung; Heidi L Oksendahl; Braden C Fleming
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 6.202

9.  Three-dimensional MRI-based statistical shape model and application to a cohort of knees with acute ACL injury.

Authors:  V Pedoia; D A Lansdown; M Zaid; C E McCulloch; R Souza; C B Ma; X Li
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 6.576

10.  Persistent Biomechanical Alterations After ACL Reconstruction Are Associated With Early Cartilage Matrix Changes Detected by Quantitative MR.

Authors:  Keiko Amano; Valentina Pedoia; Favian Su; Richard B Souza; Xiaojuan Li; C Benjamin Ma
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2016-04-28
View more
  5 in total

1.  Correlation between the elastic modulus of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and quantitative ultrashort echo time (UTE) magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Saeed Jerban; Takehito Hananouchi; Yajun Ma; Behnam Namiranian; Erik W Dorthe; Jonathan H Wong; Niloofar Shojaeiadib; Mei Wu; Jiang Du; Darryl D'Lima; Christine B Chung; Eric Y Chang
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 3.102

2.  Age- and sex-specific differences in ACL and ACL bundle size during adolescent growth.

Authors:  Stephanie G Cone; Ryan H Barnes; Danielle Howe; Lynn A Fordham; Matthew B Fisher; Jeffrey T Spang
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2021-11-02       Impact factor: 3.102

Review 3.  Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries: A review on the newest reconstruction techniques.

Authors:  Mohamad Hadi Gerami; Farshid Haghi; Ferdos Pelarak; Seyed Rohallah Mousavibaygei
Journal:  J Family Med Prim Care       Date:  2022-03-10

4.  Anterior cruciate ligament autograft maturation on sequential postoperative MRI is not correlated with clinical outcome and anterior knee stability.

Authors:  Andrea Achtnich; Patricia M Lutz; Vincent Schütte; Klaus Woertler; Andreas B Imhoff; Lukas Willinger
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2021-11-05       Impact factor: 4.114

5.  A Comprehensive Framework to Evaluate the Effects of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury and Reconstruction on Graft and Cartilage Status through the Analysis of MRI T2 Relaxation Time and Knee Laxity: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Gregorio Marchiori; Giorgio Cassiolas; Matteo Berni; Alberto Grassi; Giacomo Dal Fabbro; Milena Fini; Giuseppe Filardo; Stefano Zaffagnini; Nicola Francesco Lopomo
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-10
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.