Literature DB >> 27108845

Vision function testing for a suprachoroidal retinal prosthesis: effects of image filtering.

Nick Barnes1, Adele F Scott, Paulette Lieby, Matthew A Petoe, Chris McCarthy, Ashley Stacey, Lauren N Ayton, Nicholas C Sinclair, Mohit N Shivdasani, Nigel H Lovell, Hugh J McDermott, Janine G Walker.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: One strategy to improve the effectiveness of prosthetic vision devices is to process incoming images to ensure that key information can be perceived by the user. This paper presents the first comprehensive results of vision function testing for a suprachoroidal retinal prosthetic device utilizing of 20 stimulating electrodes. Further, we investigate whether using image filtering can improve results on a light localization task for implanted participants compared to minimal vision processing. No controlled implanted participant studies have yet investigated whether vision processing methods that are not task-specific can lead to improved results. APPROACH: Three participants with profound vision loss from retinitis pigmentosa were implanted with a suprachoroidal retinal prosthesis. All three completed multiple trials of a light localization test, and one participant completed multiple trials of acuity tests. The visual representations used were: Lanczos2 (a high quality Nyquist bandlimited downsampling filter); minimal vision processing (MVP); wide view regional averaging filtering (WV); scrambled; and, system off. MAIN
RESULTS: Using Lanczos2, all three participants successfully completed a light localization task and obtained a significantly higher percentage of correct responses than using MVP ([Formula: see text]) or with system off ([Formula: see text]). Further, in a preliminary result using Lanczos2, one participant successfully completed grating acuity and Landolt C tasks, and showed significantly better performance ([Formula: see text]) compared to WV, scrambled and system off on the grating acuity task. SIGNIFICANCE: Participants successfully completed vision tasks using a 20 electrode suprachoroidal retinal prosthesis. Vision processing with a Nyquist bandlimited image filter has shown an advantage for a light localization task. This result suggests that this and targeted, more advanced vision processing schemes may become important components of retinal prostheses to enhance performance. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01503576.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27108845     DOI: 10.1088/1741-2560/13/3/036013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neural Eng        ISSN: 1741-2552            Impact factor:   5.379


  11 in total

1.  Light localization with low-contrast targets in a patient implanted with a suprachoroidal-transretinal stimulation retinal prosthesis.

Authors:  Takao Endo; Takashi Fujikado; Masakazu Hirota; Hiroyuki Kanda; Takeshi Morimoto; Kohji Nishida
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-04-20       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Sequential epiretinal stimulation improves discrimination in simple shape discrimination tasks only.

Authors:  Breanne Christie; Roksana Sadeghi; Arathy Kartha; Avi Caspi; Francesco V Tenore; Roberta L Klatzky; Gislin Dagnelie; Seth Billings
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 5.043

Review 3.  An update on retinal prostheses.

Authors:  Lauren N Ayton; Nick Barnes; Gislin Dagnelie; Takashi Fujikado; Georges Goetz; Ralf Hornig; Bryan W Jones; Mahiul M K Muqit; Daniel L Rathbun; Katarina Stingl; James D Weiland; Matthew A Petoe
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-12-10       Impact factor: 3.708

4.  Gaze Compensation as a Technique for Improving Hand-Eye Coordination in Prosthetic Vision.

Authors:  Samuel A Titchener; Mohit N Shivdasani; James B Fallon; Matthew A Petoe
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 3.283

Review 5.  Visual Prosthesis: Interfacing Stimulating Electrodes with Retinal Neurons to Restore Vision.

Authors:  Alejandro Barriga-Rivera; Lilach Bareket; Josef Goding; Ulises A Aregueta-Robles; Gregg J Suaning
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 4.677

6.  Implantation of multiple suprachoroidal electrode arrays in rabbits.

Authors:  Walid Abdallah; Wen Li; James Weiland; Mark Humayun; Hossein Ameri
Journal:  J Curr Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-12-09

7.  Oculomotor Responses to Dynamic Stimuli in a 44-Channel Suprachoroidal Retinal Prosthesis.

Authors:  Samuel A Titchener; Jessica Kvansakul; Mohit N Shivdasani; James B Fallon; D A X Nayagam; Stephanie B Epp; Chris E Williams; Nick Barnes; William G Kentler; Maria Kolic; Elizabeth K Baglin; Lauren N Ayton; Carla J Abbott; Chi D Luu; Penelope J Allen; Matthew A Petoe
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2020-12-18       Impact factor: 3.283

8.  Inducing lateralized phosphenes over the occipital lobe using transcranial magnetic stimulation to navigate a virtual environment.

Authors:  Adonay N Gebrehiwot; Tatsuya Kato; Kimitaka Nakazawa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-04-14       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Functional Vision in the Real-World Environment With a Second-Generation (44-Channel) Suprachoroidal Retinal Prosthesis.

Authors:  Lewis Karapanos; Carla J Abbott; Lauren N Ayton; Maria Kolic; Myra B McGuinness; Elizabeth K Baglin; Samuel A Titchener; Jessica Kvansakul; Dean Johnson; William G Kentler; Nick Barnes; David A X Nayagam; Penelope J Allen; Matthew A Petoe
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2021-08-12       Impact factor: 3.283

10.  Caricaturing faces to improve identity recognition in low vision simulations: How effective is current-generation automatic assignment of landmark points?

Authors:  Elinor McKone; Rachel A Robbins; Xuming He; Nick Barnes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.