Literature DB >> 31865497

Measurement errors in serial echocardiographic assessments of aortic valve stenosis severity.

Kalie Kebed1, Deyu Sun2, Karima Addetia1, Victor Mor-Avi1, Natasha Markuzon2, Roberto M Lang3.   

Abstract

Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) evaluation of aortic stenosis (AS) is routinely performed using the continuity equation. Inaccurate measurements of the left ventricular (LV) outflow tract (LVOT) diameter are considered the most common source of error in AS grading. We hypothesized that inconsistency in LVOT velocity time integral (VTI) is an under-recognized cause of AS assessment error. We sought to determine which parameters contribute most towards inconsistencies in AS grading by studying the prevalence of different errors in a historic cohort. We identified patients with mild to severe AS with multiple studies from our database from 1994 to 2018 (n = 988 patients, 2859 studies). Errors were defined when: (1) LVOT diameter changed by > 2 mm, (2) LVOT VTI changed by > 15% without change in LV function from the initial TTE, (3) aortic valve (AV) maximum velocity (Vmax), mean pressure gradient (ΔP) or AV VTI decreased by > 15% without change in LV function from prior study. The most common error was the LVOT VTI measurement with 22% prevalence. LVOT diameter, AV VTI, AV Vmax and AV ΔP measurement caused errors in < 7% studies. Patients with normal LV function and more severe AS were more likely to have LVOT VTI errors (P < 0.05). LVOT VTI is a frequent, under-recognized source of error in assessing AS. Greater attention should be directed toward the proper positioning of the pulsed Doppler sample volume, particularly in patients with higher grades of AS and normal systolic function, to ensure accurate and reproducible assessment of AS.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aortic stenosis; Doppler echocardiography; Left ventricular outflow tract; Valvular heart disease

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31865497      PMCID: PMC7135919          DOI: 10.1007/s10554-019-01745-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  20 in total

1.  Differential left ventricular outflow tract remodeling and dynamics in aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Praveen Mehrotra; Aidan W Flynn; Katrijn Jansen; Timothy C Tan; Gary Mak; Howard M Julien; Xin Zeng; Michael H Picard; Jonathan J Passeri; Judy Hung
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2015-08-22       Impact factor: 5.251

2.  Hydraulic formula for calculation of the area of the stenotic mitral valve, other cardiac valves, and central circulatory shunts. I.

Authors:  R GORLIN; S G GORLIN
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1951-01       Impact factor: 4.749

3.  Three-dimensional imaging of the left ventricular outflow tract: impact on aortic valve area estimation by the continuity equation.

Authors:  Tamar Gaspar; Salim Adawi; Robert Sachner; Ihab Asmer; Majdi Ganaeem; Ronen Rubinshtein; Avinoam Shiran
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2012-05-19       Impact factor: 5.251

Review 4.  Progression of valvular aortic stenosis in adults: literature review and clinical implications.

Authors:  P Faggiano; G P Aurigemma; C Rusconi; W H Gaasch
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 4.749

5.  Three-Dimensional Morphology of the Left Ventricular Outflow Tract: Impact on Grading Aortic Stenosis Severity.

Authors:  Luis Caballero; Daniel Saura; María José Oliva-Sandoval; Josefa González-Carrillo; María Dolores Espinosa; Miguel García-Navarro; Mariano Valdés; Patrizio Lancellotti; Gonzalo de la Morena
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2016-11-22       Impact factor: 5.251

6.  Cross-sectional left ventricular outflow tract velocities before and after aortic valve replacement: a comparative study with two-dimensional Doppler ultrasound.

Authors:  R Wiseth; S Samstad; O Rossvoll; H G Torp; T Skjaerpe; L Hatle
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  1993 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.251

7.  Validation of instantaneous pressure gradients measured by continuous-wave Doppler in experimentally induced aortic stenosis.

Authors:  M J Callahan; A J Tajik; Q Su-Fan; A A Bove
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1985-12-01       Impact factor: 2.778

8.  Progression of valvar aortic stenosis: a long-term retrospective study.

Authors:  S W Davies; A H Gershlick; R Balcon
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 29.983

9.  Correlation of continuous wave Doppler velocities with cardiac catheterization gradients: an experimental model of aortic stenosis.

Authors:  M D Smith; P L Dawson; J L Elion; D C Booth; R Handshoe; O L Kwan; G F Earle; A N DeMaria
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 24.094

10.  Characterization and normal measurements of the left ventricular outflow tract by ECG-gated cardiac CT: implications for disorders of the outflow tract and aortic valve.

Authors:  Ethan J Halpern; Shiva Gupta; David J Halpern; David H Wiener; Alyson N Owen
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 3.173

View more
  2 in total

1.  Progressive Calcification in Bicuspid Valves: A Coupled Hemodynamics and Multiscale Structural Computations.

Authors:  Karin Lavon; Adi Morany; Rotem Halevi; Ashraf Hamdan; Ehud Raanani; Danny Bluestein; Rami Haj-Ali
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-10-27       Impact factor: 3.934

Review 2.  Severe low-gradient aortic stenosis: impact of inadequate left ventricular responses to high afterload on diagnosis and therapeutic decision-making.

Authors:  Michael Dandel; Roland Hetzer
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2022-04-16       Impact factor: 4.654

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.