Literature DB >> 3905918

Correlation of continuous wave Doppler velocities with cardiac catheterization gradients: an experimental model of aortic stenosis.

M D Smith, P L Dawson, J L Elion, D C Booth, R Handshoe, O L Kwan, G F Earle, A N DeMaria.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to use a canine preparation of experimental aortic stenosis to compare estimates of pressure gradient derived from continuous wave Doppler ultrasound with gradients measured directly by catheterization. Aortic stenosis was created in six mongrel dogs by placing an elastic band around the aorta. Eighty-eight different pressure gradients, ranging from 5 to 160 mm Hg, were produced by variable tightening of the aortic band. Pressure gradients were measured by micromanometer-tipped catheters placed in the left ventricle and aorta. Doppler spectral signals were simultaneously obtained using a 2.0 MHz nonimaging transducer placed directly on the surface of the ascending aorta. Doppler and pressure recordings were analyzed using a custom-designed software program to measure maximal instantaneous, mean and peak to peak gradients, as well as ejection and acceleration times. Maximal instantaneous Doppler gradient showed an excellent linear correlation with maximal instantaneous catheterization gradient (r = 0.98, SEE = 5.3 mm Hg). The correlation of Doppler-estimated maximal gradient to peak to peak catheterization gradient was also linear (r = 0.97, SEE = 6.2 mm Hg) but resulted in a systematic overestimation of pressure drop (mean overestimation = 9.0 mm Hg). Measurement of the Doppler gradient at mid-systole resulted in a more accurate correlation with the peak to peak catheterization gradient (r = 0.98, SEE = 6.1 mm Hg) and eliminated the problem of overestimation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3905918     DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(85)80218-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  8 in total

1.  Aortic stenosis: the spectrum of practice.

Authors:  O Khalid; D M Luxenberg; C Sable; O Benavidez; T Geva; B Hanna; R Abdulla
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2006-11-16       Impact factor: 1.655

2.  Impact of systemic hypertension on the assessment of aortic stenosis.

Authors:  L Kadem; J G Dumesnil; R Rieu; L-G Durand; D Garcia; P Pibarot
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 5.994

3.  The quest for the unholy grail.

Authors:  T Kimball
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 1.655

Review 4.  Quantitative applications of Doppler cardiography in congenital heart disease.

Authors:  S D Colan
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 2.740

5.  Measurement errors in serial echocardiographic assessments of aortic valve stenosis severity.

Authors:  Kalie Kebed; Deyu Sun; Karima Addetia; Victor Mor-Avi; Natasha Markuzon; Roberto M Lang
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2019-12-21       Impact factor: 2.357

6.  Clinical utility of Doppler echocardiography in assessing aortic stenosis severity and predicting need for intervention in children.

Authors:  Antonios P Vlahos; Gerald R Marx; Doff McElhinney; Stephen Oneill; Ioannis Goudevenos; Steven D Colan
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2007-12-14       Impact factor: 1.655

7.  Doppler estimation of pressure gradient in pulmonary stenosis: maximal instantaneous vs peak-to-peak, vs mean catheter gradient.

Authors:  A W Aldousany; T G DiSessa; R Dubois; B S Alpert; E S Willey; S E Birnbaum
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 1.655

8.  Impact of Vascular Hemodynamics on Aortic Stenosis Evaluation: New Insights Into the Pathophysiology of Normal Flow-Small Aortic Valve Area-Low Gradient Pattern.

Authors:  Nancy Côté; Louis Simard; Anne-Sophie Zenses; Lionel Tastet; Mylène Shen; Marine Clisson; Marie-Annick Clavel
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2017-07-07       Impact factor: 5.501

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.