Literature DB >> 27887818

Three-Dimensional Morphology of the Left Ventricular Outflow Tract: Impact on Grading Aortic Stenosis Severity.

Luis Caballero1, Daniel Saura1, María José Oliva-Sandoval1, Josefa González-Carrillo1, María Dolores Espinosa1, Miguel García-Navarro1, Mariano Valdés1, Patrizio Lancellotti2, Gonzalo de la Morena3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) measurement is a critical step in the quantification of aortic valve area. The assumption of a circular morphology of the LVOT may induce some errors. The aim of this study was to assess the three-dimensional (3D) morphology of the LVOT and its impact on grading aortic stenosis severity.
METHODS: Fifty-eight patients with aortic stenosis were studied retrospectively. LVOT dimensions were measured using 3D transesophageal echocardiography at three levels: at the hinge points (HP) of the aortic valve and at 4 and 8 mm proximal to the annular plane. Results were compared with standard two-dimensional echocardiographic measurements.
RESULTS: Three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography showed a funnel shape that was more circular at the HP and more elliptical at 4 and 8 mm proximal to the annular plane (circularity index = 0.92 vs 0.83 vs 0.76, P < .001). Cross-sectional area was smaller at the HP and larger at 4 and 8 mm from the annular plane (3.6 vs 3.9 vs 4.1 cm2, P = .001). The best correlation between two-dimensional and 3D transesophageal echocardiographic dimensions was at the HP (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.75; 95% CI, 0.59-0.86). When the HP approach was selected, there was a reduction in the percentage of patients with low flow (from 41% to 29%).
CONCLUSIONS: A large portion of patients with aortic stenosis have funnel-shaped and elliptical LVOTs, a morphology that is more pronounced in the region farther from the annular plane. Two-dimensional LVOT measurement closer to the annular plane has the best correlation with 3D measurements. Measurement of the LVOT closer to the annular plane should be encouraged to reduce measurement errors.
Copyright © 2016 American Society of Echocardiography. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D echocardiography; Aortic stenosis; Left ventricular outflow tract

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27887818     DOI: 10.1016/j.echo.2016.10.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr        ISSN: 0894-7317            Impact factor:   5.251


  8 in total

1.  Assessment of aortic valve tract dynamics using automatic tracking of 3D transesophageal echocardiographic images.

Authors:  Sandro Queirós; Pedro Morais; Wolfgang Fehske; Alexandros Papachristidis; Jens-Uwe Voigt; Jaime C Fonseca; Jan D'hooge; João L Vilaça
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 2.  Workup and Management of Patients With Paradoxical Low-Flow, Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis.

Authors:  Mohamed-Salah Annabi; Marine Clisson; Marie-Annick Clavel; Philippe Pibarot
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2018-05-02

3.  Direct Planimetry of Left Ventricular Outflow Tract Area by Simultaneous Biplane Imaging: Challenging the Need for a Circular Assumption of the Left Ventricular Outflow Tract in the Assessment of Aortic Stenosis.

Authors:  Shiying Liu; Jessica Churchill; Lanqi Hua; Xin Zeng; Valerie Rhoades; Mayooran Namasivayam; Vinit Baliyan; Brian B Ghoshhajra; Tony Dong; Jacob P Dal-Bianco; Jonathan J Passeri; Robert A Levine; Judy Hung
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 5.251

4.  Measurement errors in serial echocardiographic assessments of aortic valve stenosis severity.

Authors:  Kalie Kebed; Deyu Sun; Karima Addetia; Victor Mor-Avi; Natasha Markuzon; Roberto M Lang
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2019-12-21       Impact factor: 2.357

5.  Valve area and the risk of overestimating aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Ana González-Mansilla; Pablo Martinez-Legazpi; Andrea Prieto; Elena Gomá; Pilar Haurigot; Candelas Pérez Del Villar; Victor Cuadrado; Antonia Delgado-Montero; Raquel Prieto; Teresa Mombiela; Esther Pérez-David; Elena Rodríguez González; Yolanda Benito; Raquel Yotti; Manuel Pérez-Vallina; Francisco Fernández-Avilés; Javier Bermejo
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2019-02-16       Impact factor: 5.994

6.  Impact of left ventricular outflow tract flow acceleration on aortic valve area calculation in patients with aortic stenosis

Authors:  Andaleeb A Ahmed; Robina Matyal; Feroze Mahmood; Ruby Feng; Graham B Berry; Scott Gilleland; Kamal R Khabbaz
Journal:  Echo Res Pract       Date:  2019-11-04

Review 7.  Multimodality Imaging for Discordant Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis: Assessing the Valve and the Myocardium.

Authors:  Ezequiel Guzzetti; Mohamed-Salah Annabi; Philippe Pibarot; Marie-Annick Clavel
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2020-12-03

Review 8.  3D and 4D Ultrasound: Current Progress and Future Perspectives.

Authors:  Susan H Kwon; Aasha S Gopal
Journal:  Curr Cardiovasc Imaging Rep       Date:  2017-11-10
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.