Literature DB >> 31864938

Prognostic significance of the controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score in advanced urothelial carcinoma patients.

Hiroaki Suzuki1, Masaya Ito2, Kosuke Takemura1, Yasukazu Nakanishi1, Madoka Kataoka1, Kazumasa Sakamoto1, Ken-Ichi Tobisu1, Fumitaka Koga3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION &
OBJECTIVES: The controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score, consisting of serum albumin, total lymphocyte count, and total cholesterol, is a validated and objective tool for nutritional assessment. Cancer-bearing patients often suffer from malnutrition in association with cachexia. We explored the prognostic role of malnutrition evaluated by the CONUT score in advanced urothelial carcinoma (aUC) patients. MATERIALS &
METHODS: Between 2003 and 2018, 201 aUC patients with cT4 and/or metastases to lymph nodes/distant organs were treated at a single cancer center. Of these, 185 were subjects of this retrospective study, with 16 excluded due to missing data. Clinical variables examined included age, sex, performance status (PS), body mass index (BMI), primary tumor site, lymph node/visceral metastasis, treatments before and after the diagnosis of aUC, hemoglobin, lactate dehydrogenase, alkaline phosphatase (ALP), C-reactive protein (CRP) and the CONUT score. Associations between clinical variables and overall survival (OS) were examined using the Cox proportional hazards model.
RESULTS: The median (range) CONUT score was 2 (0-8). A higher CONUT score was associated with poorer PS (P < 0.001), lower BMI (P = 0.007), lower hemoglobin (P < 0.001), higher ALP (P = 0.005), and higher CRP (P < 0.001). During follow-up (median 12.3 months), 133 (72%) patients died. The median OS periods for patients with CONUT scores of 0 to 1, 2 to 3 and ≥4 were 19.3, 13.3, and 7.7 months, respectively (P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed a higher CONUT score to be an independent and significant adverse prognostic factor (2-3 vs. 0-1, hazard ratio [HR] 1.57, P = 0.024; ≥4 vs 0-1, HR 2.94, P < 0.001), along with greater age (P = 0.003), poorer PS (P = 0.006), lower BMI (P = 0.008), primary tumor site in the upper tract (P = 0.004), higher CRP (P < 0.001), no usage of pembrolizumab (P = 0.005), and no curative treatment after the diagnosis of aUC (P = 0.035).
CONCLUSION: This study showed the prognostic significance of the CONUT score in aUC patients. The CONUT score indicates a patient's general condition from the aspect of nutritional status, and appears to be independent of PS as a prognosticator.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Advanced urothelial carcinoma; Malnutrition; Prognostic factor; controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31864938     DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2019.10.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Oncol        ISSN: 1078-1439            Impact factor:   3.498


  7 in total

1.  The Controlling Nutritional Status CONUT Score in Patients With Advanced Bladder Cancer After Radical Cystectomy.

Authors:  Yuki Nemoto; Tsunenori Kondo; Hiroki Ishihara; Toshio Takagi; Hironori Fukuda; Kazuhiko Yoshida; Junpei Iizuka; Hideki Ishida; Kazunari Tanabe
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2021 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.155

2.  Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score as a predictive marker for short-term complications following gastrectomy of gastric cancer: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Feng Sun; Chen Zhang; Zhijian Liu; Shichao Ai; Wenxian Guan; Song Liu
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-03-05       Impact factor: 3.067

3.  Controlling Nutritional Status Score Before Receiving Treatment as a Prognostic Indicator for Patients With Urothelial Cancer: An Exploration Evaluation Methods.

Authors:  Lei Peng; Chunxiao Du; Chunyang Meng; Jinze Li; Chengyu You; Xianhui Li; Pan Zhao; Dehong Cao; Yunxiang Li
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-10-13       Impact factor: 6.244

4.  The Impact of Diabetes on the Prognosis of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma After Radical Nephroureterectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Xiaoshuai Gao; Liang Zhou; Jianzhong Ai; Wei Wang; Xingpeng Di; Liao Peng; Banghua Liao; Xi Jin; Hong Li; Kunjie Wang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-10-18       Impact factor: 6.244

5.  Prognostic value of the controlling nutritional status score in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes.

Authors:  Qiuni Chen; Kankan Chen; Sumei Wang; Lijuan Zhang; Yuye Shi; Shandong Tao; Zhengmei He; Chunling Wang; Liang Yu
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2022-07-27

6.  Association Between Poor Nutritional Status and Increased Risk for Subsequent Vertebral Fracture in Elderly People with Percutaneous Vertebroplasty.

Authors:  Xin-Yue Fang; Hao-Wei Xu; Hao Chen; Shu-Bao Zhang; Yu-Yang Yi; Xiao-Yong Ge; Shan-Jin Wang
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2022-10-12       Impact factor: 3.829

Review 7.  Predictors of Mortality in Patients with Advanced Cancer-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Catherine Owusuaa; Simone A Dijkland; Daan Nieboer; Agnes van der Heide; Carin C D van der Rijt
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 6.639

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.