Literature DB >> 33622895

The Controlling Nutritional Status CONUT Score in Patients With Advanced Bladder Cancer After Radical Cystectomy.

Yuki Nemoto1, Tsunenori Kondo2, Hiroki Ishihara1, Toshio Takagi1, Hironori Fukuda1, Kazuhiko Yoshida1, Junpei Iizuka1, Hideki Ishida1, Kazunari Tanabe1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIM: The impact of the controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score on oncological outcomes after radical cystectomy (RC) for advanced bladder cancer (BC) is unknown. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 115 patients who underwent RC for advanced BC at our department between November 2003 and February 2019. The CONUT score was calculated from serum albumin levels, total lymphocyte counts, and total cholesterol levels. Relapse-free survival (RFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS) after RC were analyzed.
RESULTS: For the CONUT score, the area under curve was 0.651 and the optimal cut-off value determined using the Youden index was 3. The high CONUT group had significantly shorter RFS, CSS, and OS than the low CONUT group. Multivariate analyses showed that the CONUT score was an independent prognostic factor of RFS, CSS, and OS.
CONCLUSION: The CONUT score could be an effective predictor for survival and tolerability following RC for advanced BC. Copyright
© 2021, International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Urothelial carcinoma; cachexia; inflammation; predictor; sarcopenia

Year:  2021        PMID: 33622895      PMCID: PMC8045070          DOI: 10.21873/invivo.12343

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  In Vivo        ISSN: 0258-851X            Impact factor:   2.155


  32 in total

1.  Albumin concentrations are primarily determined by the body cell mass and the systemic inflammatory response in cancer patients with weight loss.

Authors:  D C McMillan; W S Watson; P O'Gorman; T Preston; H R Scott; C S McArdle
Journal:  Nutr Cancer       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.900

Review 2.  Bladder cancer: epidemiology, staging and grading, and diagnosis.

Authors:  Ziya Kirkali; Theresa Chan; Murugesan Manoharan; Ferran Algaba; Christer Busch; Liang Cheng; Lambertus Kiemeney; Martin Kriegmair; R Montironi; William M Murphy; Isabell A Sesterhenn; Masaaki Tachibana; Jeff Weider
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.649

3.  Are pretreatment serum albumin and cholesterol levels prognostic tools in patients with colorectal carcinoma?

Authors:  Omer Cengiz; Belma Kocer; Süleyman Sürmeli; Mary-Jo Santicky; Atilla Soran
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2006-05-29

4.  Prognostic value of modified Glasgow Prognostic Score in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

Authors:  Shoji Kimura; David D' Andrea; Francesco Soria; Beat Foerster; Mohammad Abufaraj; Mihai D Vartolomei; Takehiro Iwata; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Michael Rink; Kilian M Gust; Shin Egawa; Shahrokh F Shariat
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2018-12-21       Impact factor: 3.498

5.  The influence of nutritional status on complications after operations for lung cancer.

Authors:  R T Jagoe; T H Goodship; G J Gibson
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 4.330

6.  Low preoperative serum cholesterol level is associated with aggressive pathologic features and poor cancer-specific survival in patients with surgically treated renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Ho Won Kang; Sung Pil Seo; Won Tae Kim; Seok Joong Yun; Sang-Cheol Lee; Wun-Jae Kim; Eu Chang Hwang; Seok Ho Kang; Sung-Hoo Hong; Jinsoo Chung; Tae Gyun Kwon; Hyeon Hoe Kim; Cheol Kwak; Seok-Soo Byun; Yong-June Kim
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-08-08       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  Controlling Nutritional Status score: A new prognostic indicator for patients with oligometastatic prostate cancer.

Authors:  Wentao Zhang; Yuan Wu; Ziwei Zhang; Yadong Guo; Ruiliang Wang; Longsheng Wang; Shiyu Mao; Junfeng Zhang; Xudong Yao
Journal:  Curr Probl Cancer       Date:  2019-03-15       Impact factor: 3.187

Review 8.  The Role of Cholesterol in Cancer.

Authors:  Omer F Kuzu; Mohammad A Noory; Gavin P Robertson
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2016-04-05       Impact factor: 12.701

9.  Preoperative Prognostic Nutritional Index is a Significant Predictor of Survival with Bladder Cancer after Radical Cystectomy: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Ding Peng; Yan-Qing Gong; Han Hao; Zhi-Song He; Xue-Song Li; Cui-Jian Zhang; Li-Qun Zhou
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2017-06-02       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  Preoperative serum total cholesterol is a predictor of prognosis in patients with renal cell carcinoma: a meta- analysis of observational studies.

Authors:  Bin Li; Deliang Huang; Huilan Zheng; Qiang Cai; Zhenlang Guo; Shusheng Wang
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2020 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.541

View more
  2 in total

1.  Controlling Nutritional Status Score Before Receiving Treatment as a Prognostic Indicator for Patients With Urothelial Cancer: An Exploration Evaluation Methods.

Authors:  Lei Peng; Chunxiao Du; Chunyang Meng; Jinze Li; Chengyu You; Xianhui Li; Pan Zhao; Dehong Cao; Yunxiang Li
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-10-13       Impact factor: 6.244

2.  Prognostic Effect of the Controlling Nutritional Status Score in Patients With Esophageal Cancer Treated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor.

Authors:  Lele Chang; Qian Cheng; Yue Ma; Chunlong Wu; Xuemei Zhang; Qian Ma; Lei He; Qingwei Li; Ji Tao
Journal:  J Immunother       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 4.912

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.