| Literature DB >> 31857609 |
Alberto Niccolai1, Manuel Venturi2, Viola Galli1, Niccolò Pini1, Liliana Rodolfi1,3, Natascia Biondi1, Massimo D'Ottavio1, Ana Paula Batista4, Anabela Raymundo4, Lisa Granchi1, Mario R Tredici1.
Abstract
The aim of this work was to evaluate the influence of Arthrospira platensis F&M-C256 (spirulina) incorporation on the nutritional and functional properties of "crostini", a leavened bakery product largely consumed in Italy and Europe. Sourdough was used as leavening and fermentation agent and three concentrations of A. platensis F&M-C256 were tested: 2%, 6% and 10% (w/w). Despite a lower volume increase compared to the control, the A. platensis F&M-C256 "crostini" doughs reached a technological appropriate volume after fermentation. At the end of fermentation, no significant differences in microorganisms concentrations were observed. A. platensis F&M-C256 "crostini" showed higher protein content compared to the control. Considering the European Commission Regulation on nutritional claims, "crostini" incorporated with 6% and 10% biomass can be claimed to be a "source of protein". Six and ten percent A. platensis "crostini" also presented significantly higher antioxidant capacity and phenolics. A significantly lower value of in vitro dry matter and protein digestibility between A. platensis F&M-C256 "crostini" and the control was found. The overall acceptability decreased with increasing A. platensis F&M-C256 addition. The combination of spirulina biomass addition and the sourdough technology led to the development of a novel microalgae-based bakery product with nutritional and functional features.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31857609 PMCID: PMC6923427 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-55840-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Biochemical composition of A. platensis F&M-C256 biomass used in the experiments. Data are expressed as % (w/w) of algal powder. Results are expressed as average ± standard deviation (n = 3).
| Moisture | Ash | Lipid | Protein | Carbohydrate | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7.7 ± 0.1 | 5.8 ± 0.1 | 6.7 ± 0.002 | 67.3 ± 0.01 | 12.5 ± 0.2 |
“Crostini” recipes (%, w/w). Control (without A. platensis F&M-C256 incorporation) (C) and “crostini” enriched with 2% (Ap 2), 6% (Ap 6) and 10% (Ap 10) (w/w) A. platensis F&M-C256 biomass.
| Ingredients | C | Ap 2 | Ap 6 | Ap 10 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sourdough | 25 | 25 | 25 | 25 |
| Wheat flour | 47 | 45 | 41 | 37 |
| Water | 17 | 17 | 17 | 17 |
| Extra virgin olive oil | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
| Salt | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 0 | 2 | 6 | 10 |
Acidification parameters (pH and Total Titratable Acidity, TTA), volume increase (%, ∆V/V0), microorganism concentrations (LAB and yeast) of the doughs at the end of fermentation and organic acids and free amino acid (FAA) content of “crostini”.
| Doughs | “Crostini” | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Final pH | -∆ pH | Final TTA | ∆ TTA | ΔV/V0 x100 | LAB | Yeasts | Lactic | Acetic acid | FAA | |
| C | 4.66 ± 0.09a | 0.36 ± 0.05b | 3.13 ± 0.12a | 0.70 ± 0.00a | 196 ± 15b | (2.6 ± 0.21) × 108a | (2.7 ± 0.78) × 107a | 0.27 ± 0.05a | 0.01 ± 0.01a | 0.10 ± 0.02a |
| Ap 2 | 4.85 ± 0.09ab | 0.31 ± 0.11ab | 3.87 ± 0.23b | 1.70 ± 0.21ab | 163 ± 21ab | (2.6 ± 1.22) × 108a | (3.3 ± 1.37) × 107a | 0.29 ± 0.06a | 0.02 ± 0.01a | 0.14 ± 0.03a |
| Ap 6 | 4.90 ± 0.00ab | 0.17 ± 0.04a | 5.45 ± 0.21c | 1.20 ± 0.28ab | 161 ± 25ab | (3.5 ± 0.12) × 108a | (3.9 ± 0.45) × 107a | 0.37 ± 0.19a | 0.05 ± 0.03b | 0.37 ± 0.01b |
| Ap 10 | 5.04 ± 0.06b | 0.17 ± 0.04a | 6.85 ± 0.21d | 1.85 ± 0.78b | 144 ± 15a | (3.3 ± 0.47) × 108a | (3.1 ± 0.95) × 107a | 0.34 ± 0.11a | 0.06 ± 0.02b | 0.45 ± 0.02c |
(C = control without A. platensis F&M-C256 incorporation; Ap 2, Ap 6 and Ap 10 indicate doughs and “crostini” enriched with 2, 6 and 10% (w/w) A. platensis F&M-C256 biomass; ∆: difference between the final and the initial value). Results are expressed as average ± standard deviation (n = 3). Different letters in the same column correspond to significant differences (p < 0.05).
Proximate chemical composition (g/100 g) of control (without A. platensis F&M-C256 incorporation) (C) and of “crostini” enriched with 2% (Ap 2), 6% (Ap 6) and 10% (Ap 10) (w/w) A. platensis F&M-C256 biomass.
| Moisture | Ash | Lipid | Protein | Carbohydrate | Energetic value (kcal/100 g) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C | 7.7 ± 2.0a | 1.8 ± 0.3a | 16.6 ± 0.7a | 9.9 ± 2.2a | 61.0 ± 6.7b | 433.2 |
| Ap 2 | 7.4 ± 0.4a | 1.9 ± 0.04a | 16.5 ± 0.8a | 10.4 ± 2.4a | 59.7 ± 4.0a,b | 429.0 |
| Ap 6 | 9.1 ± 1.0b | 2.7 ± 0.1b | 18.2 ± 0.9a | 14.3 ± 2.2b | 57.8 ± 3.8a,b | 450.5 |
| Ap 10 | 9.3 ± 0.4b | 2.9 ± 0.6b | 16.8 ± 0.8a | 16.7 ± 1.9c | 57.8 ± 2.4a,b | 449.0 |
Results are expressed as average ± standard deviation (n = 9). Different letters in the same column correspond to significant differences (p < 0.05).
Figure 1Linear regression between phycocyanin content (%, w/w) of control (without A. platensis F&M-C256 incorporation) (0%) and of “crostini” enriched with 2%, 6% and 10% (w/w) A. platensis F&M-C256 biomass. Results are expressed as average ± standard deviation (n = 9).
Figure 2Total phenolic content (expressed as gallic acid equivalents mg g−1 dry weight) (white columns) and radical-scavenging capacity (%) (grey columns) of control (without A. platensis F&M-C256 incorporation) (C) and of “crostini” enriched with 2% (Ap2), 6% (Ap6) and 10% (Ap10) (w/w) A. platensis F&M-C256 biomass. Results are expressed as average ± standard deviation (n = 9). Different letters correspond to significant differences (p < 0.05).
Figure 3In vitro dry matter digestibility (IVD, %) (white columns) and in vitro protein digestibility (IVPD, %) (grey columns) of control (without A. platensis F&M-C256 incorporation) (C) and of “crostini” enriched with 2% (Ap2), 6% (Ap6) and 10% (Ap10) (w/w) A. platensis F&M-C256 biomass. Results are expressed as average ± standard deviation (n = 9). Different letters correspond to significant differences (p < 0.05).
Figure 4Control “crostini” (without A. platensis F&M-C256 incorporation) (C) and “crostini” enriched with 2% (Ap 2), 6% (Ap 6) and 10% (Ap 10) (w/w) A. platensis F&M-C256 biomass.
Instrumental color parameters of control (without A. platensis F&M-C256 incorporation) (C) and of “crostini” enriched with 2% (Ap 2), 6% (Ap 6) and 10% (Ap 10) (w/w) A. platensis F&M-C256 biomass.
| L* | a* | b* | C* | h° | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C | 69.0 ± 1.0d | −1.1 ± 0.1d | 16.8 ± 0.7d | 16.8 ± 0.7d | 93.8 ± 0.2c |
| Ap 2 | 35.9 ± 0.4c | 0.7 ± 0.2c | 12.5 ± 0.6c | 12.5 ± 0.6c | 86.6 ± 0.9b |
| Ap 6 | 28.9 ± 0.8b | 0.4 ± 0.1b | 3.7 ± 0.7b | 3.7 ± 0.7b | 83.7 ± 1.9b |
| Ap 10 | 26.7 ± 0.6a | 0.3 ± 0.1a | 1.2 ± 0.4a | 1.2 ± 0.4a | 76.7 ± 4.3a |
Results are expressed as average ± standard deviation (n = 12). Different letters in the same column correspond to significant differences (p < 0.05).
Figure 5Responses of the sensory analysis panel tasters (n = 35) of control (without A. platensis F&M-C256 incorporation) (C) and of “crostini” enriched with 2% (Ap 2), 6% (Ap 6) and 10% (Ap 10) (w/w) A. platensis F&M-C256 biomass. 0 – “very unpleasant”; 1 – “unpleasant”; 2 – “slightly unpleasant”; 3 – “slightly pleasant”; 4 – “pleasant”; 5 – “very pleasant”. Different letters correspond to significant differences (p < 0.05).
Figure 6Responses of the sensory analysis panel tasters (n = 35) of control (without A. platensis F&M-C256 incorporation) (C) and of “crostini” enriched with 2% (Ap2), 6% (Ap6) and 10% (Ap10) (w/w) A. platensis F&M-C256 biomass intention of buying.