| Literature DB >> 33193143 |
Alberto Niccolai1, Kaja Bažec2, Liliana Rodolfi1,3, Natascia Biondi1, Emil Zlatić2, Polona Jamnik2, Mario R Tredici1.
Abstract
The main objective of this study was to evaluate the suitability of Arthrospira platensis F&M-C256 (spirulina) biomass in a vegetal soybean drink or in water, as substrate for lactic acid fermentation by the probiotic bacterium Lactiplantibacillus plantarum ATCC 8014 (LAB8014) and to evaluate the fermented products in terms of bacteria content and organic acids content, biochemical composition, total phenolics, and phycocyanin content, in vitro digestibility, in vitro and in vivo antioxidant activity. After 72 h of fermentation, a bacterial concentration of about 10.5 log CFU mL-1 in the broths containing the soybean drink + spirulina + LAB8014 (SD + S + LAB8014) or water + spirulina + LAB8014 (W + S + LAB8014) was found. Lactic acid concentration reached similar values (about 1.7 g L-1) in the two broths, while a different acetic acid concentration between SD + S + LAB8014 and W + S + LAB8014 broths was observed (7.7 and 4.1 g L-1, respectively). A. platensis biomass was shown to be a suitable substrate for LAB8014 growth. After fermentation, both broths contained a high protein content (>50%). In both broths, total phenolics, in vitro and in vivo antioxidant activity increased after fermentation (+35, +20, and +93% on average, respectively), while phycocyanin content decreased (-40% on average). Digestibility of W + S + LAB8014 broth statistically improved after fermentation. This study highlights the potential of A. platensis F&M-C256 biomass as a substrate for the production of new functional lactose-free beverages.Entities:
Keywords: antioxidants; digestibility; lactic acid fermentation; lactose-free functional beverage; proteins; spirulina; vegetal soybean drink
Year: 2020 PMID: 33193143 PMCID: PMC7649261 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.560684
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Biochemical composition of A. platensis F&M-C256 biomass used in the experiments.
| Moisture | Ash | Lipid | Protein | Carbohydrate | |
| 7.7 ± 0.1 | 5.8 ± 0.1 | 6.7 ± 1.3 | 67.3 ± 0.5 | 12.5 ± 0.2 |
Nutritional declaration of commercial vegetal soybean drink “Alce Nero” used in the experiments.
| Lipid (g) | Protein (g) | Carbohydrate (g) | Salt (g) | Calcium (mg) | Energy (Kcal) | |
| Vegetal soybean drink | 1.8 | 3 | 1 | 0.1 | 120 | 34 |
FIGURE 1Plan of the experiments.
FIGURE 2Bacterial growth curves in the different broths. Values are expressed as mean ± s.d. The amount of A. platensis F&M-C256 biomass at the start of the experiment (0 h) for the spirulina-based broths was 92 g (dry weight) L– 1.
Trend of pH of the different broths during fermentation.
| Fermentation times (h) | ||||
| 0 | 24 | 48 | 72 | |
| Soybean drink | 8.22 ± 0.03 | 6.88 ± 0.03 | 6.82 ± 0.09 | 7.59 ± 0.04 |
| Soybean drink + LAB8014 | 8.30 ± 0.02 | 6.79 ± 0.02 | 6.68 ± 0.06 | 6.99 ± 0.09 |
| Soybean drink + spirulina | 6.63 ± 0.02 | 6.08 ± 0.02 | 6.04 ± 0.02 | 6.12 ± 0.04 |
| Soybean drink + spirulina + LAB8014 | 6.47 ± 0.03 | 5.99 ± 0.04 | 5.71 ± 0.03 | 5.94 ± 0.02 |
| Water + spirulina | 6.13 ± 0.01 | 5.85 ± 0.03 | 5.58 ± 0.03 | 5.58 ± 0.02 |
| Water + spirulina + LAB8014 | 6.50 ± 0.02 | 5.57 ± 0.03 | 5.53 ± 0.03 | 5.93 ± 0.08 |
FIGURE 3Lactic and acetic acid production by LAB8014 in the different fermentation broths. Values are expressed as mean ± s.d. Different letters between columns of the same broth combination, for lactic or acetic acid, show significant differences (P < 0.05).
Biochemical composition of lyophilised broths at the start (0 h) and after 72 h of fermentation.
| Fermentation times (h) | ||||||||||
| 0 | 72 | |||||||||
| Carbohydrate | Lipid | Protein | Ash | Moisture | Carbohydrate | Lipid | Protein | Ash | Moisture | |
| Soybean drink | 14.56 ± 1.02 | 34.97 ± 1.52 | 40.99 ± 3.49 | 8.02 ± 1.03 | 0.74 ± 1.05 | 8.79 ± 2.02 | 43.17 ± 1.31 | 45.13 ± 3.36 | 0.58 ± 1.32 | 2.78 ± 1.73 |
| Soybean drink + LAB8014 | 13.37 ± 1.45 | 35.15 ± 0.94 | 40.97 ± 2.43 | 11.13 ± 1.16 | 0.54 ± 0.34 | 7.71 ± 0.60 | 44.33 ± 2.10 | 45.25 ± 2.52 | 1.05 ± 0.67 | 4.44 ± 1.53 |
| Soybean drink + spirulina | 15.29 ± 0.91 | 20.00 ± 0.36 | 60.95 ± 1.47 | 0.24 ± 2.08 | 2.96 ± 0.94 | 9.66 ± 0.22 | 24.88 ± 1.15 | 43.35 ± 1.49 | 8.89 ± 0.98 | 11.47 ± 0.28 |
| Soybean drink + spirulina + LAB8014 | 16.31 ± 1.47 | 14.91 ± 0.97 | 57.82 ± 0.95 | 6.27 ± 0.62 | 4.75 ± 0.49 | 12.23 ± 1.17 | 23.40 ± 0.46 | 51.32 ± 1.88 | 5.74 ± 1.46 | 7.66 ± 0.95 |
| Water + spirulina | 16.05 ± 1.04 | 9.05 ± 0.48 | 67.42 ± 4.02 | 3.18 ± 2.46 | 3.08 ± 1.54 | 14.48 ± 0.48 | 10.98 ± 0.28 | 64.83 ± 2.46 | 7.61 ± 0.40 | 4.22 ± 0.14 |
| Water + spirulina + LAB8014 | 16.29 ± 2.93 | 7.73 ± 1.08 | 63.62 ± 0.79 | 1.64 ± 1.72 | 10.22 ± 1.69 | 12.77 ± 1.00 | 10.31 ± 0.39 | 54.83 ± 3.83 | 8.92 ± 1.72 | 11.48 ± 1.93 |
In vitro digestibility (% dry matter) of lyophilised broths at the start (0 h) and after 72 h of fermentation.
| Fermentation times (h) | ||
| 0 | 72 | |
| Soybean drink | 74.58 ± 2.54 | 78.54 ± 3.45 |
| Soybean drink + LAB8014 | 72.83 ± 3.78 | 75.91 ± 2.16 |
| Soybean drink + spirulina | 82.62 ± 2.02 | 86.17 ± 1.85 |
| Soybean drink + spirulina + LAB8014 | 82.69 ± 1.42 | 84.17 ± 1.38 |
| Water + spirulina | 84.27 ± 1.41 | 90.14 ± 1.75 |
| Water + spirulina + LAB8014 | 82.09 ± 0.09 | 87.89 ± 1.66 |
FIGURE 4DPPH radical scavenging capacity (%) of lyophilised broths. Values are expressed as mean ± s.d. Different letters between columns of the same broth show significant differences (P < 0.05).
FIGURE 5Total phenolic content, expressed as mg of gallic acid equivalent (GAE) per g of lyophilised broth. Values are expressed as mean ± s.d. Different letters between columns of the same broth show significant differences (P < 0.05).
FIGURE 6Phycocyanin contents of lyophilised fermentation broths containing A. platensis F&M-C256 biomass. Values are expressed as mean ± SD. Different letters between columns of the same broth, for PC or for APC, show significant differences (P < 0.05).
FIGURE 7Intracellular oxidation in the yeast S. cerevisiae after 2-h exposure to different water extracts prepared from lyophilised broths at the start (0 h) and after 72 h of fermentation. The extracts were added to the yeast cell suspension (YCS) at a concentration of about 50 μL extract mL– 1 of YCS. The positive control (yeast cells treated with PBS buffer instead of extract) presents 100% relative fluorescence intensity (red line). Data are expressed as means of relative values (fluorescence intensity/optical density) ±s.d. Different letters between columns at particular time point show significant differences (P < 0.05).
FIGURE 8Linear correlation between in vitro radical scavenging capacity (expressed as %) and in vivo intracellular oxidation (expressed as 100 – relative fluorescence intensity, RFI) (n = 12; significance level P < 0.05). Negative values of RFI were considered as 0.