Literature DB >> 31851958

Many-isocenter optimization for robotic radiotherapy.

Qihui Lyu1, Ryan Neph, Victoria Y Yu, Dan Ruan, Salime Boucher, Ke Sheng.   

Abstract

Despite significant dosimetric gains, clinical implementation of the 4π non-coplanar radiotherapy on the widely available C-arm gantry system is hindered by limited clearance, and the need to perform complex coordinated gantry and couch motion. A robotic radiotherapy platform would be conducive to such treatment but a new conflict between field size and MLC modulation resolution needs to be managed for versatile applications. This study investigates the dosimetry and delivery efficiency of purposefully creating many isocenters to achieve simultaneously high MLC modulation resolution and large tumor coverage. An integrated optimization framework was proposed for simultaneous beam orientation optimization (BOO), isocenter selection, and fluence map optimization (FMO). The framework includes a least-square dose fidelity objective, a total variation term for regularizing the fluence smoothness, and a group sparsity term for beam selection. A minimal number of isocenters were identified for efficient target coverage. Colliding beams excluded, high-resolution small-field 4π intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) treatment plans with 50 cm source-to-isocenter distance (SID-50) on 10 Head and Neck (H&N) cancer patients were compared with low-resolution large-field plans with 100 cm SID (SID-100). With the same or better target coverage, the average reduction of [Dmean, Dmax] of 20-beam SID-50 plans from 20-beam SID-100 plans were [2.09 Gy, 1.19 Gy] for organs at risk (OARs) overall, [3.05 Gy, 0.04 Gy] for parotid gland, [3.62 Gy, 5.19 Gy] for larynx, and [3.27 Gy, 1.10 Gy] for mandible. R50 and integral dose were reduced by 5.3% and 9.6%, respectively. Wilcoxon signed-rank test showed significant difference (p   <  0.05) in planning target volume (PTV) homogeneity, PTV Dmax, R50, Integral dose, and OAR Dmean and Dmax. The estimated delivery time of 20-beam [SID-50, SID-100] plans were [19, 18] min and [14, 9] min, assuming 5 fractions and 30 fractions, respectively. With clinically acceptable delivery efficiency, many-isocenter optimization is dosimetrically desirable for treating large targets with high modulation resolution on the robotic platform.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31851958      PMCID: PMC7100370          DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ab63b8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  47 in total

Review 1.  Volumetric modulated arc therapy: a review of current literature and clinical use in practice.

Authors:  M Teoh; C H Clark; K Wood; S Whitaker; A Nisbet
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Red shell: defining a high-risk zone of normal tissue damage in stereotactic body radiation therapy.

Authors:  Jun Yang; Jack F Fowler; John P Lamond; Rachelle Lanciano; Jing Feng; Luther W Brady
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-04-17       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  A two isocenter IMRT technique with a controlled junction dose for long volume targets.

Authors:  G G Zeng; R K Heaton; C N Catton; P W Chung; B O'Sullivan; M Lau; A Parent; D A Jaffray
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2007-07-03       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Volumetric modulated arc radiotherapy for carcinomas of the oro-pharynx, hypo-pharynx and larynx: a treatment planning comparison with fixed field IMRT.

Authors:  Eugenio Vanetti; Alessandro Clivio; Giorgia Nicolini; Antonella Fogliata; Sarbani Ghosh-Laskar; Jai Prakash Agarwal; Ritu Raj Upreti; Ashwini Budrukkar; Vedang Murthy; Deepak Dattatray Deshpande; Shyam Kishore Shrivastava; Ketayun Ardeshir Dinshaw; Luca Cozzi
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2009-01-20       Impact factor: 6.280

5.  Using total-variation regularization for intensity modulated radiation therapy inverse planning with field-specific numbers of segments.

Authors:  Lei Zhu; Louis Lee; Yunzhi Ma; Yinyu Ye; Rafe Mazzeo; Lei Xing
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2008-11-07       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Single-arc VMAT optimization for dual-layer MLC.

Authors:  Qihui Lyu; Ryan Neph; Victoria Y Yu; Dan Ruan; Ke Sheng
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2019-05-02       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Non-coplanar trajectories to improve organ at risk sparing in volumetric modulated arc therapy for primary brain tumors.

Authors:  Gregory Smyth; Philip M Evans; Jeffrey C Bamber; Henry C Mandeville; Liam C Welsh; Frank H Saran; James L Bedford
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2016-07-29       Impact factor: 6.280

8.  Parallel beamlet dose calculation via beamlet contexts in a distributed multi-GPU framework.

Authors:  Ryan Neph; Cheng Ouyang; John Neylon; Youming Yang; Ke Sheng
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2019-06-30       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Fraction-variant beam orientation optimization for non-coplanar IMRT.

Authors:  Daniel O'Connor; Victoria Yu; Dan Nguyen; Dan Ruan; Ke Sheng
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  The development and verification of a highly accurate collision prediction model for automated noncoplanar plan delivery.

Authors:  Victoria Y Yu; Angelia Tran; Dan Nguyen; Minsong Cao; Dan Ruan; Daniel A Low; Ke Sheng
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 4.071

View more
  1 in total

1.  Compact X-Band Electron Linac for Radiotherapy and Security Applications.

Authors:  S V Kutsaev; R Agustsson; A Arodzero; R Berry; A Bezhanov; S Boucher; O Chimalpopoca; A Diego; L Faillace; D Gavryushkin; M Harrison; J J Hartzell; J McNevin; M Ruelas; A Yu Smirnov; A Verma; K Woods
Journal:  Radiat Phys Chem Oxf Engl 1993       Date:  2021-04-11       Impact factor: 2.776

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.