Literature DB >> 27481571

Non-coplanar trajectories to improve organ at risk sparing in volumetric modulated arc therapy for primary brain tumors.

Gregory Smyth1, Philip M Evans2, Jeffrey C Bamber3, Henry C Mandeville4, Liam C Welsh4, Frank H Saran4, James L Bedford3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: To evaluate non-coplanar volumetric modulated arc radiotherapy (VMAT) trajectories for organ at risk (OAR) sparing in primary brain tumor radiotherapy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifteen patients were planned using coplanar VMAT and compared against non-coplanar VMAT plans for three trajectory optimization techniques. A geometric heuristic technique (GH) combined beam scoring and Dijkstra's algorithm to minimize the importance-weighted sum of OAR volumes irradiated. Fluence optimization was used to perform a local search around coplanar and GH trajectories, producing fluence-based local search (FBLS) and FBLS+GH trajectories respectively.
RESULTS: GH, FBLS, and FBLS+GH trajectories reduced doses to the contralateral globe, optic nerve, hippocampus, temporal lobe, and cochlea. However, FBLS increased dose to the ipsilateral lens, optic nerve and globe. Compared to GH, FBLS+GH increased dose to the ipsilateral temporal lobe and hippocampus, contralateral optics, and the brainstem and body. GH and FBLS+GH trajectories reduced bilateral hippocampi normal tissue complication probability (p=0.028 and p=0.043, respectively). All techniques reduced PTV conformity; GH and FBLS+GH trajectories reduced homogeneity but less so for FBLS+GH.
CONCLUSIONS: The geometric heuristic technique best spared OARs and reduced normal tissue complication probability, however incorporating fluence information into non-coplanar trajectory optimization maintained PTV homogeneity.
Copyright © 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hippocampal sparing; Non-coplanar; Optimization; Trajectory; Treatment planning; VMAT

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27481571     DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2016.07.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiother Oncol        ISSN: 0167-8140            Impact factor:   6.280


  18 in total

1.  Dosimetric accuracy of dynamic couch rotation during volumetric modulated arc therapy (DCR-VMAT) for primary brain tumours.

Authors:  Gregory Smyth; Philip M Evans; Jeffrey C Bamber; Henry C Mandeville; A Rollo Moore; Liam C Welsh; Frank H Saran; James L Bedford
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2019-04-05       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Dose-dependent white matter damage after brain radiotherapy.

Authors:  Michael Connor; Roshan Karunamuni; Carrie McDonald; Nathan White; Niclas Pettersson; Vitali Moiseenko; Tyler Seibert; Deborah Marshall; Laura Cervino; Hauke Bartsch; Joshua Kuperman; Vyacheslav Murzin; Anitha Krishnan; Nikdokht Farid; Anders Dale; Jona Hattangadi-Gluth
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 6.280

3.  Many-isocenter optimization for robotic radiotherapy.

Authors:  Qihui Lyu; Ryan Neph; Victoria Y Yu; Dan Ruan; Salime Boucher; Ke Sheng
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2020-02-10       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Postmastectomy radiotherapy for left-sided breast cancer patients: Comparison of advanced techniques.

Authors:  Yibo Xie; Daniel Bourgeois; Beibei Guo; Rui Zhang
Journal:  Med Dosim       Date:  2019-05-23       Impact factor: 1.482

5.  4π plan optimization for cortical-sparing brain radiotherapy.

Authors:  Vyacheslav L Murzin; Kaley Woods; Vitali Moiseenko; Roshan Karunamuni; Kathryn R Tringale; Tyler M Seibert; Michael J Connor; Daniel R Simpson; Ke Sheng; Jona A Hattangadi-Gluth
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 6.280

6.  Parallel beamlet dose calculation via beamlet contexts in a distributed multi-GPU framework.

Authors:  Ryan Neph; Cheng Ouyang; John Neylon; Youming Yang; Ke Sheng
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2019-06-30       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Comparison of non-coplanar optimization of static beams and arc trajectories for intensity-modulated treatments of meningioma cases.

Authors:  Tiago Ventura; Humberto Rocha; Brigida da Costa Ferreira; Joana Dias; Maria do Carmo Lopes
Journal:  Phys Eng Sci Med       Date:  2021-10-07

8.  Verification of the delivered patient radiation dose for non-coplanar beam therapy.

Authors:  Ivan Kutuzov; Timothy Van Beek; Boyd M C McCurdy
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2021-05-22       Impact factor: 2.102

9.  Hippocampus-sparing radiotherapy using volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) to the primary brain tumor: the result of dosimetric study and neurocognitive function assessment.

Authors:  Kyung Su Kim; Chan Woo Wee; Jin-Yong Seok; Joo Wan Hong; Jin-Beom Chung; Keun-Yong Eom; Jae-Sung Kim; Chae-Yong Kim; Young Ho Park; Yu Jung Kim; In Ah Kim
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 3.481

10.  Feasibility of hippocampus-sparing VMAT for newly diagnosed glioblastoma treated by chemoradiation: pattern of failure analysis.

Authors:  Chan Woo Wee; Kyung Su Kim; Chae-Yong Kim; Jung Ho Han; Yu Jung Kim; In Ah Kim
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-05-06       Impact factor: 3.481

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.