Literature DB >> 29351088

Fraction-variant beam orientation optimization for non-coplanar IMRT.

Daniel O'Connor1, Victoria Yu, Dan Nguyen, Dan Ruan, Ke Sheng.   

Abstract

Conventional beam orientation optimization (BOO) algorithms for IMRT assume that the same set of beam angles is used for all treatment fractions. In this paper we present a BOO formulation based on group sparsity that simultaneously optimizes non-coplanar beam angles for all fractions, yielding a fraction-variant (FV) treatment plan. Beam angles are selected by solving a multi-fraction fluence map optimization problem involving 500-700 candidate beams per fraction, with an additional group sparsity term that encourages most candidate beams to be inactive. The optimization problem is solved using the fast iterative shrinkage-thresholding algorithm. Our FV BOO algorithm is used to create five-fraction treatment plans for digital phantom, prostate, and lung cases as well as a 30-fraction plan for a head and neck case. A homogeneous PTV dose coverage is maintained in all fractions. The treatment plans are compared with fraction-invariant plans that use a fixed set of beam angles for all fractions. The FV plans reduced OAR mean dose and D 2 values on average by 3.3% and 3.8% of the prescription dose, respectively. Notably, mean OAR dose was reduced by 14.3% of prescription dose (rectum), 11.6% (penile bulb), 10.7% (seminal vesicle), 5.5% (right femur), 3.5% (bladder), 4.0% (normal left lung), 15.5% (cochleas), and 5.2% (chiasm). D 2 was reduced by 14.9% of prescription dose (right femur), 8.2% (penile bulb), 12.7% (proximal bronchus), 4.1% (normal left lung), 15.2% (cochleas), 10.1% (orbits), 9.1% (chiasm), 8.7% (brainstem), and 7.1% (parotids). Meanwhile, PTV homogeneity defined as D 95/D 5 improved from .92 to .95 (digital phantom), from .95 to .98 (prostate case), and from .94 to .97 (lung case), and remained constant for the head and neck case. Moreover, the FV plans are dosimetrically similar to conventional plans that use twice as many beams per fraction. Thus, FV BOO offers the potential to reduce delivery time for non-coplanar IMRT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29351088      PMCID: PMC5880032          DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aaa94f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  31 in total

1.  A novel linear programming approach to fluence map optimization for intensity modulated radiation therapy treatment planning.

Authors:  H Edwin Romeijn; Ravindra K Ahuja; James F Dempsey; Arvind Kumar; Jonathan G Li
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2003-11-07       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  A dynamic programming approach to adaptive fractionation.

Authors:  Jagdish Ramakrishnan; David Craft; Thomas Bortfeld; John N Tsitsiklis
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-02-14       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Using total-variation regularization for intensity modulated radiation therapy inverse planning with field-specific numbers of segments.

Authors:  Lei Zhu; Louis Lee; Yunzhi Ma; Yinyu Ye; Rafe Mazzeo; Lei Xing
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2008-11-07       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Dose domain regularization of MLC leaf patterns for highly complex IMRT plans.

Authors:  Dan Nguyen; Daniel O'Connor; Victoria Y Yu; Dan Ruan; Minsong Cao; Daniel A Low; Ke Sheng
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Feasibility of using intermediate x-ray energies for highly conformal extracranial radiotherapy.

Authors:  Peng Dong; Victoria Yu; Dan Nguyen; John Demarco; Kaley Woods; Salime Boucher; Daniel A Low; Ke Sheng
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  4π noncoplanar stereotactic body radiation therapy for head-and-neck cancer: potential to improve tumor control and late toxicity.

Authors:  Jean-Claude M Rwigema; Dan Nguyen; Dwight E Heron; Allen M Chen; Percy Lee; Pin-Chieh Wang; John A Vargo; Daniel A Low; M Saiful Huq; Stephen Tenn; Michael L Steinberg; Patrick Kupelian; Ke Sheng
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2014-12-05       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  The development and verification of a highly accurate collision prediction model for automated noncoplanar plan delivery.

Authors:  Victoria Y Yu; Angelia Tran; Dan Nguyen; Minsong Cao; Dan Ruan; Daniel A Low; Ke Sheng
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  A feasibility study: Selection of a personalized radiotherapy fractionation schedule using spatiotemporal optimization.

Authors:  Minsun Kim; Robert D Stewart; Mark H Phillips
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Viability of Non-Coplanar VMAT for Liver SBRT as Compared to Coplanar VMAT and Beam Orientation Optimized 4π IMRT.

Authors:  Kaley Woods; Dan Nguyen; Angelia Tran; Victoria Y Yu; Minsong Cao; Tianye Niu; Percy Lee; Ke Sheng
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2016 Jan-Mar

10.  Evaluation of the efficiency and effectiveness of independent dose calculation followed by machine log file analysis against conventional measurement based IMRT QA.

Authors:  Baozhou Sun; Dharanipathy Rangaraj; Sunita Boddu; Murty Goddu; Deshan Yang; Geethpriya Palaniswaamy; Sridhar Yaddanapudi; Omar Wooten; Sasa Mutic
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2012-09-06       Impact factor: 2.102

View more
  6 in total

1.  Many-isocenter optimization for robotic radiotherapy.

Authors:  Qihui Lyu; Ryan Neph; Victoria Y Yu; Dan Ruan; Salime Boucher; Ke Sheng
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2020-02-10       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Fraction-variant beam orientation optimization for intensity-modulated proton therapy.

Authors:  Wenbo Gu; Daniel O'Connor; Dan Ruan; Wei Zou; Lei Dong; Ke Sheng
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2020-08-02       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Using deep learning to predict beam-tunable Pareto optimal dose distribution for intensity-modulated radiation therapy.

Authors:  Gyanendra Bohara; Azar Sadeghnejad Barkousaraie; Steve Jiang; Dan Nguyen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2020-08-02       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  A reinforcement learning application of a guided Monte Carlo Tree Search algorithm for beam orientation selection in radiation therapy.

Authors:  Azar Sadeghnejad-Barkousaraie; Gyanendra Bohara; Steve Jiang; Dan Nguyen
Journal:  Mach Learn Sci Technol       Date:  2021-05-13

5.  Fixed Beamline Optimization for Intensity Modulated Carbon-Ion Therapy.

Authors:  Pavitra Ramesh; Hengjie Liu; Wenbo Gu; Ke Sheng
Journal:  IEEE Trans Radiat Plasma Med Sci       Date:  2021-06-25

6.  A feasibility study for predicting optimal radiation therapy dose distributions of prostate cancer patients from patient anatomy using deep learning.

Authors:  Dan Nguyen; Troy Long; Xun Jia; Weiguo Lu; Xuejun Gu; Zohaib Iqbal; Steve Jiang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.