Literature DB >> 2757094

Test-retest variability in glaucomatous visual fields.

A Heijl1, A Lindgren, G Lindgren.   

Abstract

We measured test-retest variations in computerized visual fields from glaucomatous eyes. Fifty-one patients were tested four times within a four-week period; the severity of disease varied from incipient to advanced. We determined the dependence of threshold variability on defect depth and test point location. In areas of the visual field initially found to have moderate loss of sensitivity, variation in follow-up measurements ranged from normal sensitivity to absolute defect, with little dependence on distance from fixation. Conversely, large changes were considerably more unusual in locations initially showing normal or near-normal sensitivities, and variability was lowest in the most central portion of the field. Our findings suggest that differentiation between true progression and random variation will be facilitated if these factors are taken into account, as well as if comparisons are based on more than two tests. The complex nature of interest variation in glaucoma makes it natural to approach this problem with the help of computer-assisted analyses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2757094     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9394(89)90006-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0002-9394            Impact factor:   5.258


  113 in total

1.  Frequency of testing for detecting visual field progression.

Authors:  S K Gardiner; D P Crabb
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Measurement error of visual field tests in glaucoma.

Authors:  P G D Spry; C A Johnson; A M McKendrick; A Turpin
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  Spatial pattern of glaucomatous visual field loss obtained with regionally condensed stimulus arrangements.

Authors:  Ulrich Schiefer; Eleni Papageorgiou; Pamela A Sample; John P Pascual; Bettina Selig; Elke Krapp; Jens Paetzold
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  [Current state of pupil-based diagnostics for glaucomatous optic neuropathy].

Authors:  K Skorkovská; U Schiefer; B Wilhelm; H Wilhelm
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.059

5.  Normal visual field test results following glaucomatous visual field end points in the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study.

Authors:  John L Keltner; Chris A Johnson; Richard A Levine; Juanjuan Fan; Kimberly E Cello; Michael A Kass; Mae O Gordon
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-09

6.  Pupillary evaluation of retinal asymmetry: development and initial testing of a technique.

Authors:  Yanjun Chen; Harry J Wyatt; William H Swanson
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Linearity can account for the similarity among conventional, frequency-doubling, and gabor-based perimetric tests in the glaucomatous macula.

Authors:  Hao Sun; Mitchell W Dul; William H Swanson
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 1.973

8.  Variability of visual field measurements is correlated with the gradient of visual sensitivity.

Authors:  Harry J Wyatt; Mitchell W Dul; William H Swanson
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-02-23       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Relationships of retinal structure and humphrey 24-2 visual field thresholds in patients with glaucoma.

Authors:  Hrvoje Bogunović; Young H Kwon; Adnan Rashid; Kyungmoo Lee; Douglas B Critser; Mona K Garvin; Milan Sonka; Michael D Abràmoff
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 4.799

10.  Five-year forecasts of the Visual Field Index (VFI) with binocular and monocular visual fields.

Authors:  Ryo Asaoka; Richard A Russell; Rizwan Malik; David F Garway-Heath; David P Crabb
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-12-07       Impact factor: 3.117

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.