| Literature DB >> 31844621 |
Zisan Zeng1, Yan Dong2, Qikai Hua3, XiaoCong Kuang4, Kai Li1, Xianyu Deng5, Shaohua Qiu6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The clinical treatment of patients with severe diabetic foot (DF) is difficult. Recently, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University began to apply tibial transverse transport (TTT) in patients with DF. This treatment has achieved significant effects, but its mechanism of action is unclear. Recently, microcirculation and the pathogenesis of diabetes have become the foci of research in this field. The evaluation of the possible mechanism of microcirculation reconstruction requires relevant indicators. The aim of this study was to investigate the value of computed tomography perfusion in evaluations of the curative effects of TTT and establish corresponding quantitative evaluation indicators.Entities:
Keywords: CT perfusion; Curative effect evaluation; Severe diabetic foot; Shuttle scan; Tibial transverse transport
Year: 2019 PMID: 31844621 PMCID: PMC6896675 DOI: 10.1016/j.jot.2019.04.005
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Orthop Translat ISSN: 2214-031X Impact factor: 5.191
Figure 1Flow chart of TTT. TTT = tibial transverse transport.
Figure 2Measurement of the length of the target vessel. 2D = two-dimensional.
Figure 3Map of the medial plantar muscle groups (abductor muscles).
Figure 4Perfusion ROI in the axial and coronal positions of the bilateral medial plantar muscle group. ROI = region of interest.
Figure 5Coronal shuttle scanning perfusion images with contrast of the bilateral medial plantar muscle groups (the left picture is postoperative and the right is preoperative). There were differences between the preoperative and postoperative BV and MTT values in the bilateral medial plantar muscle groups, and the postoperative BV in the NTF group was increased compared with the preoperative BV in the same group. BV = blood volume; MTT = mean transit time; NTF = nontransport foot.
Figure 6Double inside medial plantar muscle group shuttle scanning perfusion contrast on axial imaging (the left picture is postoperative and the right is preoperative). The image is approximately the same as the coronal image.
Comparison of the average ST values in the two feet of patients with DF preoperatively and postoperatively (x ± s).
| Groups | Preoperative ST | Postoperative ST | t | p |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TF group | 30.73 ± 1.86 °C | 32.22 ± 1.51 °C | −4.616 | 0.001 |
| NTF group | 30.93 ± 2.65 °C | 32.07 ± 2.09 °C | −2.940 | 0.013 |
NTF = nontransport foot; ST = skin temperature; TF = transport foot.
Comparison of the relative perfusion parameters of the medial plantar muscle groups preoperatively and postoperatively (x ± s).
| Relative perfusion parameters | Preoperatively | Postoperatively | t | p |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rBF | 1.282 ± 1.531 | 1.542 ± 2.379 | −0.342 | 0.739 |
| rBV | 1.375 ± 1.974 | −0.225 ± 0.491 | 2.584 | 0.027 |
| rMTT | 0.150 ± 0.653 | −0.555 ± 0.382 | 2.613 | 0.026 |
| rPMB | 2.266 ± 2.276 | 0.744 ± 0.446 | 1.827 | 0.098 |
| rTTP | −0.042 ± 0.294 | −0.174 ± 0.127 | 1.148 | 0.278 |
| rMIP | −0.174 ± 0.446 | −0.237 ± 0.417 | 1.338 | 0.211 |
rPMB = relative permeability; rBF = relative blood flow; rBV = relative blood volume; rMIP = relative maximal intensity projection; rMTT = relative mean transit time; rTTP = relative time to peak.
Each relative perfusion parameter value, including the rBF, rBV, rMTT, rPMB, rMIP, and rTTP, had a ratio of 1.
Comparison of the perfusion parameters of the medial plantar muscle groups preoperatively and postoperatively (x ± s).
| Groups | Perfusion parameters | Preoperatively | Postoperatively | t | p |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TF group | BF | 9.830 ± 5.450 | 37.601 ± 39.844 | −2.306 | 0.044 |
| BV | 1.426 ± 1.155 | 1.997 ± 1.898 | −1.231 | 0.247 | |
| MTT | 11.454 ± 10.406 | 4.532 ± 3.418 | 2.087 | 0.063 | |
| PMB | 2.524 ± 1.863 | 4.395 ± 4.370 | −1.450 | 0.178 | |
| MIP | 69.904 ± 38.955 | 63.524 ± 39.627 | 1.468 | 0.173 | |
| TTP | 27.721 ± 9.402 | 25.392 ± 5.822 | 0.763 | 0.463 | |
| NTF group | BF | 5.881 ± 3.998 | 22.221 ± 22.394 | −2.742 | 0.021 |
| BV | 0.956 ± 0.561 | 2.770 ± 1.561 | −3.443 | 0.006 | |
| MTT | 9.590 ± 10.590 | 11.923 ± 8.153 | −0.570 | 0.581 | |
| PMB | 0.859 ± 0.563 | 3.661 ± 5.787 | −1.640 | 0.132 | |
| MIP | 86.611 ± 10.763 | 86.558 ± 13.795 | 0.012 | 0.990 | |
| TTP | 28.547 ± 9.308 | 29.975 ± 3.767 | −0.510 | 0.622 |
BF = blood flow; BV = blood volume; MIP = maximal intensity projection; MTT = mean transit time; NTF = nontransport foot; PMB = permeability; TF = transport foot; TTP = time to peak.
The units of the perfusion parameters were as follows: BF, ml/100 ml/min; BV, ml/100 ml; MTT, s; PMB, ml/100 ml/min; MIP, HU; and TTP, s.
Figure 7The bottom of the left transport foot showing a new small blood vessel after surgery (the left picture is postoperative and the right is preoperative).