Literature DB >> 18984781

Perfusion CT: noninvasive surrogate marker for stratification of pancreatic cancer response to concurrent chemo- and radiation therapy.

Mi-Suk Park1, Ernst Klotz, Myeong-Jin Kim, Si Young Song, Seung Woo Park, Seung-Whan Cha, Joon Soek Lim, Jinsil Seong, Jae Bok Chung, Ki Whang Kim.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To prospectively determine whether perfusion computed tomography (CT) parameters, such as volume transfer constant (K(trans)) between blood plasma and extracellular extravascular space (EES) and blood volume calculated from dynamic CT data, can be used to predict response of pancreatic cancer to concurrent chemotherapy and radiation therapy (CCRT).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective study was institutional review board approved, and written informed consent was obtained. Thirty patients with pancreatic cancer underwent perfusion CT with 64-detector row CT before gemcitabine-based CCRT. Two perfusion parameters (K(trans) and blood volume) measured before treatment were compared between patients who responded to treatment and those who did not, as determined with World Health Organization criteria from first and second posttherapeutic follow-up CT examinations, which were performed at 3- and 6-month follow-up. Statistical analysis was performed with the two-sample t test. A receiver operating characteristic curve was used to determine the best cutoff value of perfusion parameters for differentiation of responders from nonresponders.
RESULTS: Twenty of 30 patients examined at 3-month follow-up responded to therapy. Their pretreatment K(trans) value was significantly higher than that of nonresponders (50.8 mL/100 mL/min +/- 30.5 [standard deviation] vs 19.0 mL/100 mL/min +/- 10.8, P = .001). The best cutoff value for differentiating between responders and nonresponders was 31.8 mL/100 mL/min, which yielded 75.0% sensitivity and 90.0% specificity. Ten of 18 patients examined at 6-month follow-up responded to therapy. Their pretreatment K(trans) value was significantly higher than that of nonresponders (58.6 mL/100 mL/min +/- 43.2 vs 19.8 mL/100 mL/min +/- 10.9, P = .002). Responders also had higher blood volume values, but this difference was not significant.
CONCLUSION: Tumors with a high pretreatment K(trans) value tended to respond better to CCRT than did tumors with a low pretreatment K(trans) value. Perfusion CT may be used to predict tumor response to CCRT in patients with pancreatic cancer. This might aid in development of a tailored approach to therapy in these patients. (c) RSNA, 2008.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18984781     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2493080226

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  44 in total

1.  64-row MDCT perfusion of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: technical feasibility and quantitative analysis of perfusion parameters.

Authors:  Lorenzo Faggioni; Emanuele Neri; Francesca Cerri; Eugenia Picano; Veronica Seccia; Luca Muscatello; Stefano Sellari Franceschini; Carlo Bartolozzi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-07-23       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Tracer kinetic modelling of tumour angiogenesis based on dynamic contrast-enhanced CT and MRI measurements.

Authors:  Gunnar Brix; Jürgen Griebel; Fabian Kiessling; Frederik Wenz
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Time-resolved computed tomography of the liver: retrospective, multi-phase image reconstruction derived from volumetric perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Michael A Fischer; Bertil Leidner; Nikolaos Kartalis; Anders Svensson; Peter Aspelin; Nils Albiin; Torkel B Brismar
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-08-31       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Early prediction of response of sorafenib on hepatocellular carcinoma by CT perfusion imaging: an animal study.

Authors:  Q Wang; G Shi; L Wang; X Liu; R Wu
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-01-27       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Perfusion CT is superior to angiography in predicting pancreatic necrosis in patients with severe acute pancreatitis.

Authors:  Yoshihisa Tsuji; Kyoko Hamaguchi; Yuji Watanabe; Akira Okumura; Hiroyoshi Isoda; Naoki Yamamoto; Osamu Kikuchi; Hiroyuki Yamamoto; Kazuhiro Matsueda; Kenji Ueno; Shinsuke Tada; Kaori Togashi; Hiroshi Yamamoto; Tsutomu Chiba
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-07-13       Impact factor: 7.527

6.  Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MRI Detects Responses to Stroma-directed Therapy in Mouse Models of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Jianbo Cao; Stephen Pickup; Cynthia Clendenin; Barbara Blouw; Hoon Choi; David Kang; Mark Rosen; Peter J O'Dwyer; Rong Zhou
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2018-12-26       Impact factor: 12.531

7.  Transport properties of pancreatic cancer describe gemcitabine delivery and response.

Authors:  Eugene J Koay; Mark J Truty; Vittorio Cristini; Ryan M Thomas; Rong Chen; Deyali Chatterjee; Ya'an Kang; Priya R Bhosale; Eric P Tamm; Christopher H Crane; Milind Javle; Matthew H Katz; Vijaya N Gottumukkala; Marc A Rozner; Haifa Shen; Jeffery E Lee; Huamin Wang; Yuling Chen; William Plunkett; James L Abbruzzese; Robert A Wolff; Gauri R Varadhachary; Mauro Ferrari; Jason B Fleming
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2014-03-10       Impact factor: 14.808

8.  Extracellular volume fraction determined by equilibrium contrast-enhanced multidetector computed tomography as a prognostic factor in unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma treated with chemotherapy.

Authors:  Yoshihiko Fukukura; Yuichi Kumagae; Ryutaro Higashi; Hiroto Hakamada; Koji Takumi; Kosei Maemura; Michiyo Higashi; Kiyohisa Kamimura; Masanori Nakajo; Takashi Yoshiura
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Ultrasound-guided direct delivery of 3-bromopyruvate blocks tumor progression in an orthotopic mouse model of human pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Shinichi Ota; Jean-Francois H Geschwind; Manon Buijs; Joost W Wijlemans; Byung Kook Kwak; Shanmugasundaram Ganapathy-Kanniappan
Journal:  Target Oncol       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 4.493

10.  Prognostic factors in patients with locally advanced or borderline resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: chemotherapy vs. chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  Seung-Seob Kim; Sunyoung Lee; Hee Seung Lee; Seungmin Bang; Mi-Suk Park
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-08-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.