| Literature DB >> 30116386 |
Qiang Zuo1, Feng Gao1, Huanghe Song1, Jinchun Zhou1.
Abstract
The aim of the present study is to investigate the clinical value of Ilizarov transverse tibial bone transport and microcirculation reconstruction in the treatment of chronic ischemic diseases in lower limbs. A total of 90 patients with chronic ischemic diseases in lower limbs were selected and randomly divided into two groups: The observation group (n=45) and the control group (n=45). Those patients were treated with Ilizarov transverse tibial bone transport and microcirculation reconstruction, and percutaneous balloon angioplasty (PTBA), respectively. Changes in the diameter, blood flow of lower limb arteries in the paretic side, wound healing time, disappearance time of pains, dorsal foot skin temperature, and the expression area of vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGFs) were detected in both groups. Compared with control group, the diameters and blood flows of lower limb arteries were significantly larger (P<0.05), and the dorsal foot skin temperature was significantly higher at 1 day, 1 week and 1 month after operation, respectively. Meantime, the expression area of VEGFs in the observation group was significantly larger than that in the control group at 1 day, 1 week and 1 month, respectively. Furthermore, compared with control group, wound healing time and disappearance time of pains of patients were earlier in the observation group (P<0.05). At 1 month after operation, the intermittent claudication, rest pain and lower limb ulcer or gangrene among clinical symptoms of patients in the observation group improved significantly more than those in the control group (P<0.05). In conclusion, the application of Ilizarov transverse tibial bone transport and microcirculation reconstruction could achieve better outcomes in the treatment of chronic ischemic diseases in lower limbs.Entities:
Keywords: Ilizarov transverse tibial bone transport; chronic ischemic diseases in lower limbs; microcirculation reconstruction
Year: 2018 PMID: 30116386 PMCID: PMC6090279 DOI: 10.3892/etm.2018.6321
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Exp Ther Med ISSN: 1792-0981 Impact factor: 2.447
Comparisons of main artery diameter and blood flow and dorsal foot skin temperature of lower limbs between two groups of patients (mean ± SD).
| Groups | Femoral artery diameter (cm) | Popliteal artery diameter (cm) | Posterior tibial artery diameter (cm) | Dorsalis pedis artery diameter (cm) | Femoral artery blood flow (ml/min) | Popliteal artery blood flow (ml/min) | Posterior tibial artery blood flow (ml/min) | Dorsalis pedis artery blood flow (ml/min) | Dorsal foot skin temperature |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Observation | 0.58±0.04 | 0.49±0.03 | 0.13±0.01 | 0.15±0.01 | 456.5±8.3 | 158.6±6.0 | 40.2±2.1 | 33.0±2.1 | 27.1±0.2 |
| Control | 0.59±0.04 | 0.48±0.03 | 0.13±0.01 | 0.15±0.01 | 456.1±8.3 | 159.1±5.9 | 40.3±2.0 | 33.1±2.0 | 27.2±0.3 |
| t or χ2 | 1.186 | 1.342 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.229 | 0.399 | 0.231 | 0.231 | 1.861 |
| P-value | 0.239 | 0.183 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 0.820 | 0.691 | 0.818 | 0.818 | 0.007 |
Comparison of the diameters of lower limb arteries in the paretic side between the two groups (cm, mean ± SD).
| Groups | Femoral artery | Popliteal artery | Posterior tibial artery | Dorsalis pedis artery |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Observation | 0.72±0.08 | 0.60±0.05 | 0.23±0.01 | 0.21±0.01 |
| Control | 0.63±0.05 | 0.48±0.03 | 0.15±0.01 | 0.16±0.01 |
| t | 6.034 | 13.016 | 35.777 | 22.361 |
| P-value | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
Comparison of the blood flow of lower limb arteries in the paretic side between the two groups after intervention (ml/min, mean ± SD).
| Groups | Femoral artery | Popliteal artery | Posterior tibial artery | Dorsalis pedis artery |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Observation | 766.5±15.3 | 458.6±11.1 | 80.2±3.1 | 73.6±2.8 |
| Control | 698.8±12.7 | 323.2±5.9 | 53.5±2.0 | 43.1±2.5 |
| t | 21.533 | 68.123 | 45.773 | 51.389 |
| P-value | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
Figure 1.Comparison of the dorsal foot skin temperature at different observation time-points between the two groups. The dorsal foot skin temperature in the observation group at 1 day, 1 week and 1 month after operation is significantly higher than that in the control group (t=11.180, 13.416 and 13.416; p<0.05).
Figure 2.Comparison of the expression area of VEGFs during intervention between the two groups. The expression area of VEGFs in the observation group at 1 day, 1 week and 1 month after operation is significantly higher than that in the control group (t=9.513, 14.866 and 16.058; P<0.05).
Comparisons of wound healing time and disappearance time of pains between the two groups (day, mean ± SD).
| Groups | Wound healing time | Disappearance time of pains |
|---|---|---|
| Observation | 15.3±0.6 | 12.1±0.5 |
| Control | 26.5±1.5 | 25.6±1.3 |
| t | 43.846 | 61.300 |
| P-value | <0.001 | <0.001 |
Comparison of the improvement degree of clinical symptoms at 1 month after operation between the two groups (effective case/total case).
| Groups | Intermittent claudication | Rest pain | Lower limb ulcers or gangrene |
|---|---|---|---|
| Observation | 39/45 | 44/45 | 38/45 |
| Control | 25/45 | 30/45 | 11/45 |
| χ2 | 10.601 | 12.846 | 32.658 |
| P-value | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |