| Literature DB >> 31842401 |
Abstract
Although conventional microbial control techniques are currently employed and largely successful, their major drawbacks are related to their effects on quality of processed food. In recent years, there has been a growing demand for high-quality foods that are microbially safe and retain most of their natural freshness. Therefore, several modern and innovative methods of microbial control in food processing have been developed. High-hydrostatic-pressure (HHP) processing technology has been mainly used to enhance the food safety of ready-to-eat (RTE) products as a new pre-/post-packaging, non-thermal purification method in the meat industry. Listeria monocytogenes is a pertinent target for microbiological safety and shelf-life; due to its capacity to multiply in a broad range of food environments, is extremely complicated to prevent in fermented-sausage-producing plants. The frequent detection of L. monocytogenes in final products emphasizes the necessity for the producers of fermented sausages to correctly overcome the hurdles of the technological process and to prevent the presence of L. monocytogenes by applying novel control techniques. This review discusses a collection of recent studies describing pressure-induced elimination of L. monocytogenes in fermented sausages produced in the Mediterranean area.Entities:
Keywords: Listeria monocytogenes; Mediterranean; fermented sausages; high hydrostatic pressures; hurdles technology
Year: 2019 PMID: 31842401 PMCID: PMC6963505 DOI: 10.3390/foods8120672
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Foods ISSN: 2304-8158
Listeria monocytogenes inactivation kinetics in HHP-processed fermented sausages.
| Product | HHP Processing Technology | Ripening Time | Inactivation of | Multi-Hurdle Approach | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| “Fuet” and “chorizo” (Spain) | 300 MPa/10 min/17 °C | 12 °C/27 days | from 2.26 log CFU/g to 1.42 CFU/g in fuet | None | Marcos et al., 2005 [ |
| Fuet (Spain) | 400 MPa | Not defined | <1 log CFU/g at the end of ripening | Enterocins A, B and HHP | Jofrè et al., 2009 [ |
| “Genoa” salami (Italy) | 600 MPa or 483 MPa/1 to 12 min/19 °C | 17 °C/25–35 days |
1.1 to 1.3 log CFU/g (after fermentation) 1.6 to ≥5.0 log CFU/g (after drying) 3.0 log CFU/g (after storage for 28 d at 4 °C) | Fermentation, drying, and HHP | Porto Fett et al., 2010 [ |
| Fuet (Spain) | 400 MPa /10 min/17 °C | 15 °C/10 days | None | Enterocin AS-48 and HHP | Ananou et al., 2010 [ |
| NaCl-free acid (pH 4.8) and low-acid (pH 5.2) chorizo (Spain) | 600 MPa/5 min/13 °C | Not defined | <1 log CFU/g at the end of ripening | QDS process® and HHP | Stollewerk et al., 2012 [ |
| Sodium-salt-free fermented sausages | 600 MPa (5 min/12 °C | Not defined | None | HHP and antimicrobial packaging with films containing nisin | Marcos et al., 2013 [ |
| Chorizo (Spain) | 349–600 MPa/0–12.53 min/18°C | 14–15 °C /10 days | 2.47 log CFU/g at 600 MPa | HHP and water activity | Rubio et al., 2018 [ |
| Chorizo (Spain) | 400–600 MPa/0–12 min/18 °C | 14–18 °C/21–42 days | ≤1 CFU/g of | HHP and nitrite | Possas et al., 2019 [ |