Literature DB >> 28029327

Tumor Deposits in Colorectal Cancer: Improving the Value of Modern Staging-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Iris D Nagtegaal1, Nikki Knijn1, Niek Hugen1, Helen C Marshall1, Kenichi Sugihara1, Tibor Tot1, Hideki Ueno1, Philip Quirke1.   

Abstract

Purpose Colorectal cancer (CRC) treatment is largely determined by tumor stage. Despite improvements made in the treatment of various types of metastatic disease, staging has not been refined. The role of tumor deposits (TDs) in staging remains debated. We have assessed the relation of TDs with metastatic pattern to evaluate whether TDs might add significant new information to staging. Methods We performed a systematic literature search that was focused on the role of TDs in CRC. Studies with neoadjuvant-treated patients were excluded. Data on stage, histologic factors, and outcome were extracted. Data from four large cohorts were analyzed for the relevance of the presence of TDs, lymph node metastases (LNMs), and extramural vascular invasion (EMVI) on the pattern of metastases and outcomes. Results Of 10,106 included patients with CRC, 22% presented with TDs. TDs are invariably associated with poor outcome. Presence of TDs was associated with presence of LNMs and EMVI. In a pairwise comparison, effects of TD were stronger than those of both LNMs and EMVI. In the logistic regression model, TDs in combination with LNMs is the strongest predictor for liver (odds ratio [OR], 5.5), lung (OR, 4.3) and peritoneal metastases (OR, 7.0). Presence of EMVI adds information for liver and lung metastases, but not for peritoneal metastases. Conclusion We have shown that TDs are not equal to LNMs or EMVI with respect to biology and outcome. We lose valuable prognostic information by allocating TDs into nodal category N1c and only considering TDs in the absence of LNMs. Therefore, we propose that the number of TDs should be added to the number of LNMs to derive a final N stage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28029327     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2016.68.9091

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  52 in total

1.  The influence of endorectal filling on rectal cancer staging with MRI.

Authors:  Rutger Ch Stijns; Tom Wj Scheenen; Johannes Hw de Wilt; Jurgen J Fütterer; Regina Gh Beets-Tan
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 2.  Eighth Edition of the UICC Classification of Malignant Tumours: an overview of the changes in the pathological TNM classification criteria-What has changed and why?

Authors:  Luca Bertero; Federica Massa; Jasna Metovic; Roberto Zanetti; Isabella Castellano; Umberto Ricardi; Mauro Papotti; Paola Cassoni
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 4.064

3.  High-resolution MRI-based radiomics analysis to predict lymph node metastasis and tumor deposits respectively in rectal cancer.

Authors:  Yan-Song Yang; Feng Feng; Yong-Juan Qiu; Gui-Hua Zheng; Ya-Qiong Ge; Yue-Tao Wang
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-09-17

4.  Colorectal cancer: What is the role of lymph node metastases in the progression of colorectal cancer?

Authors:  Iris D Nagtegaal; Hans-Joachim Schmoll
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 46.802

5.  M51R and Delta-M51 matrix protein of the vesicular stomatitis virus induce apoptosis in colorectal cancer cells.

Authors:  Zahra Gray; Alijan Tabarraei; Abdolvahab Moradi; Mohamad R Kalani
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2019-04-20       Impact factor: 2.316

6.  Preoperative prediction of tumour deposits in rectal cancer by an artificial neural network-based US radiomics model.

Authors:  Li-Da Chen; Wei Li; Meng-Fei Xian; Xin Zheng; Yuan Lin; Bao-Xian Liu; Man-Xia Lin; Xin Li; Yan-Ling Zheng; Xiao-Yan Xie; Ming-De Lu; Ming Kuang; Jian-Bo Xu; Wei Wang
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 7.  Clinicopathological, genomic and immunological factors in colorectal cancer prognosis.

Authors:  K M Marks; N P West; E Morris; P Quirke
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 6.939

8.  Tumor deposit indicates worse prognosis than metastatic lymph node in gastric cancer: a propensity score matching study.

Authors:  Jianan Tan; Bin Yang; Zhimeng Xu; Shengning Zhou; Zhitao Chen; Jing Huang; Han Gao; Senyou Zheng; Liqiang Wen; Fanghai Han
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-11

9.  The unique prognostic characteristics of tumor deposits in colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Fangqi Liu; Jiang Zhao; Cong Li; Yuchen Wu; Wang Song; Tianan Guo; Shiqing Chen; Sanjun Cai; Dan Huang; Ye Xu
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-12

10.  SIRT2-dependent IDH1 deacetylation inhibits colorectal cancer and liver metastases.

Authors:  Bo Wang; Yingjiang Ye; Xin Yang; Boya Liu; Zhe Wang; Shuaiyi Chen; Kewei Jiang; Wei Zhang; Hongpeng Jiang; Harri Mustonen; Pauli Puolakkainen; Shan Wang; Jianyuan Luo; Zhanlong Shen
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2020-03-05       Impact factor: 8.807

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.