Literature DB >> 31825709

Persistent Neurobehavioral Markers of Developmental Morphosyntax Errors in Adults.

Neelima Wagley1, Tyler K Perrachione2, Irina Ostrovskaya3, Satrajit S Ghosh3, Patricia K Saxler3, John Lymberis3, Kenneth Wexler3, John D E Gabrieli3, Ioulia Kovelman1.   

Abstract

Purpose Child language acquisition is marked by an optional infinitive period (ages 2-4 years) during which children use nonfinite (infinitival) verb forms and finite verb forms interchangeably in grammatical contexts that require finite forms. In English, children's errors include omissions of past tense /-ed/ and 3rd-person singular /-s/. This language acquisition period typically ends by the age of 4 years, but it persists in children with language impairments. It is unknown if adults still process optional infinitives differently than other kinds of morphosyntax errors. Method We compared behavior and functional brain activation during grammaticality judgments across sentences with developmental optional infinitive tense/agreement errors ("Yesterday I play the song"), nondevelopmental agreement errors ("He am tall") that do not occur in typical child language acquisition, and grammatically correct sentences. Results Adults (N = 25) were significantly slower and less accurate in judging sentences with developmental errors relative to other sentences. Sentences with developmental errors yielded greater activation in bilateral inferior frontal gyri relative to nondevelopmental error sentences in both auditory and visual modalities. Conclusions These findings suggest that the heightened computational demands for finiteness extend well beyond early childhood and continue to exert their influence on grammatical mental and brain function in adulthood.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31825709      PMCID: PMC7201328          DOI: 10.1044/2019_JSLHR-19-00154

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  43 in total

1.  "Sparse" temporal sampling in auditory fMRI.

Authors:  D A Hall; M P Haggard; M A Akeroyd; A R Palmer; A Q Summerfield; M R Elliott; E M Gurney; R W Bowtell
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  The brain circuitry of syntactic comprehension.

Authors:  Edith Kaan; Tamara Y. Swaab
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2002-08-01       Impact factor: 20.229

3.  What is right-hemisphere contribution to phonological, lexico-semantic, and sentence processing? Insights from a meta-analysis.

Authors:  M Vigneau; V Beaucousin; Pierre-Yves Hervé; Gael Jobard; Laurent Petit; Fabrice Crivello; Emmanuel Mellet; Laure Zago; B Mazoyer; N Tzourio-Mazoyer
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-07-23       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Effects of syntactic structure and propositional number on patterns of regional cerebral blood flow.

Authors:  D Caplan; N Alpert; G Waters
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Localization of syntactic comprehension by positron emission tomography.

Authors:  K Stromswold; D Caplan; N Alpert; S Rauch
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 2.381

6.  The neurobiology of language beyond single words.

Authors:  Peter Hagoort; Peter Indefrey
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2014-06-02       Impact factor: 12.449

7.  A new fun and robust version of an fMRI localizer for the frontotemporal language system.

Authors:  Terri L Scott; Jeanne Gallée; Evelina Fedorenko
Journal:  Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 3.065

8.  Linguistic constraints on children's overt marking of BE by dialect and age.

Authors:  Joseph Roy; Janna B Oetting; Christy Wynn Moland
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2012-12-28       Impact factor: 2.297

9.  Judgments of omitted BE and DO in questions as extended finiteness clinical markers of specific language impairment (SLI) to 15 years: a study of growth and asymptote.

Authors:  Mabel L Rice; Lesa Hoffman; Ken Wexler
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2009-09-28       Impact factor: 2.297

10.  Grammatical Morpheme Effects on Sentence Processing by School-Aged Adolescents with Specific Language Impairment.

Authors:  Laurence B Leonard; Carol A Miller; Denise A Finneran
Journal:  Lang Cogn Process       Date:  2008-07-01
View more
  1 in total

1.  Semantic and syntactic specialization during auditory sentence processing in 7-8-year-old children.

Authors:  Jin Wang; Neelima Wagley; Mabel L Rice; James R Booth
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2021-10-06       Impact factor: 4.027

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.