PURPOSE: Overt marking of BE in nonmainstream adult dialects of English is influenced by a number of linguistic constraints, including the structure's person, number, tense, contractibility, and grammatical function. In the current study, the authors examined the effects of these constraints on overt marking of BE in children as a function of their nonmainstream English dialect and age. METHOD: The data were language samples from 62 children, ages 4-6 years; 24 children spoke African American English (AAE), and 38 spoke Southern White English (SWE). Analyses included analysis of variance and logistic regression. RESULTS: Rates of overt marking varied by the children's dialect but not their age. Although the person, number, tense, and grammatical function of BE influenced the children's rates of marking, the nature and magnitude of the influence differed by the children's dialect. For AAE-speaking children, contractibility also influenced their marking of BE. CONCLUSIONS: Consistent with the adult literature, the current study showed that AAE- and SWE-speaking children marked BE in ways that differed from each other and from what has been documented for child speakers of Mainstream American English. These findings show stability in the use of BE in AAE and SWE that spans different generations and different dialect communities.
PURPOSE: Overt marking of BE in nonmainstream adult dialects of English is influenced by a number of linguistic constraints, including the structure's person, number, tense, contractibility, and grammatical function. In the current study, the authors examined the effects of these constraints on overt marking of BE in children as a function of their nonmainstream English dialect and age. METHOD: The data were language samples from 62 children, ages 4-6 years; 24 children spoke African American English (AAE), and 38 spoke Southern White English (SWE). Analyses included analysis of variance and logistic regression. RESULTS: Rates of overt marking varied by the children's dialect but not their age. Although the person, number, tense, and grammatical function of BE influenced the children's rates of marking, the nature and magnitude of the influence differed by the children's dialect. For AAE-speaking children, contractibility also influenced their marking of BE. CONCLUSIONS: Consistent with the adult literature, the current study showed that AAE- and SWE-speaking children marked BE in ways that differed from each other and from what has been documented for child speakers of Mainstream American English. These findings show stability in the use of BE in AAE and SWE that spans different generations and different dialect communities.
Entities:
Keywords:
children; cultural and linguistic diversity; morphology
Authors: Neelima Wagley; Tyler K Perrachione; Irina Ostrovskaya; Satrajit S Ghosh; Patricia K Saxler; John Lymberis; Kenneth Wexler; John D E Gabrieli; Ioulia Kovelman Journal: J Speech Lang Hear Res Date: 2019-12-09 Impact factor: 2.297
Authors: Janna B Oetting; Jessica R Berry; Kyomi D Gregory; Andrew M Rivière; Janet McDonald Journal: J Speech Lang Hear Res Date: 2019-09-13 Impact factor: 2.297
Authors: Janna B Oetting; Andrew M Rivière; Jessica R Berry; Kyomi D Gregory; Tina M Villa; Janet McDonald Journal: J Speech Lang Hear Res Date: 2021-01-20 Impact factor: 2.297