Literature DB >> 19690626

Grammatical Morpheme Effects on Sentence Processing by School-Aged Adolescents with Specific Language Impairment.

Laurence B Leonard1, Carol A Miller, Denise A Finneran.   

Abstract

Sixteen-year-olds with specific language impairment (SLI), nonspecific language impairment (NLI), and those showing typical language development (TD) responded to target words in sentences that were either grammatical or contained a grammatical error immediately before the target word. The TD participants showed the expected slower response times (RTs) when errors preceded the target word, regardless of error type. The SLI and NLI groups also showed the expected slowing, except when the error type involved the omission of a tense/agreement inflection. This response pattern mirrored an early developmental period of alternating between using and omitting tense/agreement inflections that is characteristic of SLI and NLI. The findings could not be readily attributed to factors such as insensitivity to omissions in general or insensitivity to the particular phonetic forms used to mark tense/agreement. The observed response pattern may represent continued difficulty with tense/agreement morphology that persists in subtle form into adolescence.

Entities:  

Year:  2008        PMID: 19690626      PMCID: PMC2727723          DOI: 10.1080/01690960802229649

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lang Cogn Process        ISSN: 0169-0965


  44 in total

1.  An examination of verbal working memory capacity in children with specific language impairment.

Authors:  S Ellis Weismer; J Evans; L J Hesketh
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 2.297

Review 2.  General slowing in language impairment: methodological considerations in testing the hypothesis.

Authors:  J Windsor; R L Milbrath; E J Carney; S E Rakowski
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Verbal working memory and sentence comprehension in children with specific language impairment.

Authors:  J W Montgomery
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Grammaticality judgements of an extended optional infinitive grammar: evidence from English-speaking children with specific language impairment.

Authors:  M L Rice; K Wexler; S M Redmond
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Three accounts of the grammatical morpheme difficulties of English-speaking children with specific language impairment.

Authors:  L B Leonard; J A Eyer; L M Bedore; B G Grela
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  Fourteen-year follow-up of children with and without speech/language impairments: speech/language stability and outcomes.

Authors:  C J Johnson; J H Beitchman; A Young; M Escobar; L Atkinson; B Wilson; E B Brownlie; L Douglas; N Taback; I Lam; M Wang
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  Language-impaired preschoolers: a follow-up into adolescence.

Authors:  S E Stothard; M J Snowling; D V Bishop; B B Chipchase; C A Kaplan
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 2.297

Review 8.  Developmental dyslexia and specific language impairment: same or different?

Authors:  Dorothy V M Bishop; Margaret J Snowling
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 17.737

9.  Is the movement deficit in syntactic SLI related to traces or to thematic role transfer?

Authors:  Naama Friedmann; Rama Novogrodsky
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2006-11-03       Impact factor: 2.381

10.  Specific language impairment as a period of extended optional infinitive.

Authors:  M L Rice; K Wexler; P L Cleave
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1995-08
View more
  7 in total

1.  Decreased sensitivity to long-distance dependencies in children with a history of specific language impairment: electrophysiological evidence.

Authors:  J D Purdy; Laurence B Leonard; Christine Weber-Fox; Natalya Kaganovich
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-06-01       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Sentence Repetition Accuracy in Adults With Developmental Language Impairment: Interactions of Participant Capacities and Sentence Structures.

Authors:  Gerard H Poll; Carol A Miller; Janet G van Hell
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Electrophysiological correlates of rapid auditory and linguistic processing in adolescents with specific language impairment.

Authors:  Christine Weber-Fox; Laurence B Leonard; Amanda Hampton Wray; J Bruce Tomblin
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.381

4.  Visual attentional engagement deficits in children with specific language impairment and their role in real-time language processing.

Authors:  Marco Dispaldro; Laurence B Leonard; Nicola Corradi; Milena Ruffino; Tiziana Bronte; Andrea Facoetti
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2012-10-05       Impact factor: 4.027

5.  Persistent Neurobehavioral Markers of Developmental Morphosyntax Errors in Adults.

Authors:  Neelima Wagley; Tyler K Perrachione; Irina Ostrovskaya; Satrajit S Ghosh; Patricia K Saxler; John Lymberis; Kenneth Wexler; John D E Gabrieli; Ioulia Kovelman
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-12-09       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  Neural patterns elicited by sentence processing uniquely characterize typical development, SLI recovery, and SLI persistence.

Authors:  Eileen Haebig; Christine Weber; Laurence B Leonard; Patricia Deevy; J Bruce Tomblin
Journal:  J Neurodev Disord       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 4.025

Review 7.  Problems with tense marking in children with specific language impairment: not how but when.

Authors:  Dorothy V M Bishop
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 6.237

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.