Lauren R Schaff1, Dongyao Yan2, Sheeno Thyparambil2, Yuan Tian2, Fabiola Cecchi2, Marc Rosenblum3, Anne S Reiner4, Katherine S Panageas4, Todd Hembrough2, Andrew L Lin5. 1. Department of Neurology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA. schaffl@mskcc.org. 2. NantOmics, Culver City, CA, 90230, USA. 3. Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA. 4. Department of Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA. 5. Department of Neurology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Understanding the molecular landscape of glioblastoma (GBM) is increasingly important in the age of targeted therapy. O-6-Methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation and EGFR amplification are markers that may play a role in prognostication, treatment, and/or clinical trial eligibility. Quantification of MGMT and EGFR protein expression may offer an alternative strategy towards understanding GBM. Here, we quantify baseline expression of MGMT and EGFR protein in newly diagnosed GBM samples using mass spectrometry. We correlate findings with MGMT methylation and EGFR amplification statuses and survival. METHODS: We retrospectively identified adult patients with newly diagnosed resected GBM. MGMT and EGFR protein expression were quantified using a selected reaction monitoring mass spectrometry assay. Protein levels were correlated with MGMT methylation and EGFR amplification and survival data. RESULTS: We found a statistically significant association between MGMT protein expression and promoter methylation status (p = 0.02) as well as between EGFR protein expression and EGFR amplification (p < 0.0001). EGFR protein expression and amplification were more tightly associated than MGMT protein expression and methylation. Only MGMT promoter methylation was statistically significantly associated with progression-free and overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: Unlike EGFR protein expression and EGFR amplification which are strongly associated, only a weak association was seen between MGMT protein expression and promoter methylation. Quantification of MGMT protein expression was inferior to MGMT methylation for prognostication in GBM. Discordance was observed between EGFR amplification and EGFR protein expression; additional study is warranted to determine whether EGFR protein expression is a better biomarker than EGFR amplification for clinical decisions and trial enrollment.
PURPOSE: Understanding the molecular landscape of glioblastoma (GBM) is increasingly important in the age of targeted therapy. O-6-Methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation and EGFR amplification are markers that may play a role in prognostication, treatment, and/or clinical trial eligibility. Quantification of MGMT and EGFR protein expression may offer an alternative strategy towards understanding GBM. Here, we quantify baseline expression of MGMT and EGFR protein in newly diagnosed GBM samples using mass spectrometry. We correlate findings with MGMT methylation and EGFR amplification statuses and survival. METHODS: We retrospectively identified adult patients with newly diagnosed resected GBM. MGMT and EGFR protein expression were quantified using a selected reaction monitoring mass spectrometry assay. Protein levels were correlated with MGMT methylation and EGFR amplification and survival data. RESULTS: We found a statistically significant association between MGMT protein expression and promoter methylation status (p = 0.02) as well as between EGFR protein expression and EGFR amplification (p < 0.0001). EGFR protein expression and amplification were more tightly associated than MGMT protein expression and methylation. Only MGMT promoter methylation was statistically significantly associated with progression-free and overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: Unlike EGFR protein expression and EGFR amplification which are strongly associated, only a weak association was seen between MGMT protein expression and promoter methylation. Quantification of MGMT protein expression was inferior to MGMT methylation for prognostication in GBM. Discordance was observed between EGFR amplification and EGFR protein expression; additional study is warranted to determine whether EGFR protein expression is a better biomarker than EGFR amplification for clinical decisions and trial enrollment.
Entities:
Keywords:
EGFR; Glioblastoma; MGMT; Mass spectrometry; Proteomics
Authors: Pierre Bady; Davide Sciuscio; Annie-Claire Diserens; Jocelyne Bloch; Martin J van den Bent; Christine Marosi; Pierre-Yves Dietrich; Michael Weller; Luigi Mariani; Frank L Heppner; David R Mcdonald; Denis Lacombe; Roger Stupp; Mauro Delorenzi; Monika E Hegi Journal: Acta Neuropathol Date: 2012-07-19 Impact factor: 17.088
Authors: Jill A Maxwell; Stewart P Johnson; Jennifer A Quinn; Roger E McLendon; Francis Ali-Osman; Allan H Friedman; James E Herndon; Katja Bierau; Joseph Bigley; Darell D Bigner; Henry S Friedman Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2006-10 Impact factor: 6.261
Authors: Martin J van den Bent; Lonneke A Gravendeel; Thierry Gorlia; Johan M Kros; Lariesa Lapre; Pieter Wesseling; Johannes L Teepen; Ahmed Idbaih; Marc Sanson; Peter A E Sillevis Smitt; Pim J French Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2011-09-13 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Marta Brell; Avelina Tortosa; Eugenia Verger; Juan Miguel Gil; Nuria Viñolas; Salvador Villá; Juan José Acebes; Lluis Caral; Teresa Pujol; Isidro Ferrer; Teresa Ribalta; Francesc Graus Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2005-07-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Iris Lavon; Dana Fuchs; Daniel Zrihan; Gilat Efroni; Bracha Zelikovitch; Yakov Fellig; Tali Siegal Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2007-09-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Roger Stupp; Sophie Taillibert; Andrew Kanner; William Read; David Steinberg; Benoit Lhermitte; Steven Toms; Ahmed Idbaih; Manmeet S. Ahluwalia; Karen Fink; Francesco Di Meco; Frank Lieberman; Jay-Jiguang Zhu; Giuseppe Stragliotto; David Tran; Steven Brem; Andreas Hottinger; Eilon D. Kirson; Gitit Lavy-Shahaf; Uri Weinberg; Chae-Yong Kim; Sun-Ha Paek; Garth Nicholas; Jordi Bruna; Hal Hirte; Michael Weller; Yoram Palti; Monika E. Hegi; Zvi Ram Journal: JAMA Date: 2017-12-19 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Alireza Mansouri; Laureen D Hachem; Sheila Mansouri; Farshad Nassiri; Normand J Laperriere; Daniel Xia; Neal I Lindeman; Patrick Y Wen; Arnab Chakravarti; Minesh P Mehta; Monika E Hegi; Roger Stupp; Kenneth D Aldape; Gelareh Zadeh Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2019-02-14 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Dorothee Hölzl; Georg Hutarew; Barbara Zellinger; Beate Alinger-Scharinger; Hans U Schlicker; Christoph Schwartz; Karl Sotlar; Theo F J Kraus Journal: Biomedicines Date: 2022-03-29
Authors: Maria Diaz Rosario; Harpreet Kaur; Erdal Tasci; Uma Shankavaram; Mary Sproull; Ying Zhuge; Kevin Camphausen; Andra Krauze Journal: Biomolecules Date: 2022-08-30