PURPOSE: The MGMT promoter methylation status has been suggested to be predictive for outcome to temozolomide chemotherapy in patients with glioblastoma (GBM). Subsequent studies indicated that MGMT promoter methylation is a prognostic marker even in patients treated with radiotherapy alone, both in GBMs and in grade III gliomas. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: To help determine the molecular mechanism behind this prognostic effect, we have conducted genome-wide methylation profiling and determined the MGMT promoter methylation status, 1p19q LOH, IDH1 mutation status, and expression profile on a series of oligodendroglial tumors [anaplastic oligodendrogliomas (AOD) and anaplastic oligoastrocytomas (AOA)] within EORTC study 26951. The series was expanded with tumors of the same histology and treatment from our own archive. RESULTS: Methylation profiling identified two main subgroups of oligodendroglial brain tumors of which survival in the CpG island hypermethylation phenotype (CIMP(+)) subgroup was markedly better than the survival of the unmethylated (CIMP(-)) subgroup (5.62 vs. 1.24 years; P < 0.0001). CIMP status correlated with survival, MGMT promoter methylation, 1p19q LOH, and IDH1 mutation status. CIMP status strongly increases the predictive accuracy of survival in a model including known clinical prognostic factors such as age and performance score. We validated our results on an independent data set from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). CONCLUSION: The strong association between CIMP status and MGMT promoter methylation suggests that the MGMT promoter methylation status is part of a more general, prognostically favorable genome-wide methylation profile. Methylation profiling therefore may help identify AODs and AOAs with improved prognosis.
PURPOSE: The MGMT promoter methylation status has been suggested to be predictive for outcome to temozolomide chemotherapy in patients with glioblastoma (GBM). Subsequent studies indicated that MGMT promoter methylation is a prognostic marker even in patients treated with radiotherapy alone, both in GBMs and in grade III gliomas. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: To help determine the molecular mechanism behind this prognostic effect, we have conducted genome-wide methylation profiling and determined the MGMT promoter methylation status, 1p19q LOH, IDH1 mutation status, and expression profile on a series of oligodendroglial tumors [anaplastic oligodendrogliomas (AOD) and anaplastic oligoastrocytomas (AOA)] within EORTC study 26951. The series was expanded with tumors of the same histology and treatment from our own archive. RESULTS: Methylation profiling identified two main subgroups of oligodendroglial brain tumors of which survival in the CpG island hypermethylation phenotype (CIMP(+)) subgroup was markedly better than the survival of the unmethylated (CIMP(-)) subgroup (5.62 vs. 1.24 years; P < 0.0001). CIMP status correlated with survival, MGMT promoter methylation, 1p19q LOH, and IDH1 mutation status. CIMP status strongly increases the predictive accuracy of survival in a model including known clinical prognostic factors such as age and performance score. We validated our results on an independent data set from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). CONCLUSION: The strong association between CIMP status and MGMT promoter methylation suggests that the MGMT promoter methylation status is part of a more general, prognostically favorable genome-wide methylation profile. Methylation profiling therefore may help identify AODs and AOAs with improved prognosis.
Authors: Guan Sun; Shushan Yan; Lei Shi; Zhengqiang Wan; Nan Jiang; Min Li; Jun Guo Journal: Cancer Biother Radiopharm Date: 2015-03-26 Impact factor: 3.099
Authors: Lakshmi Nayak; Katherine S Panageas; Anne S Reiner; Jason T Huse; Elena Pentsova; Stephanie G Braunthal; Lauren E Abrey; Lisa M DeAngelis; Andrew B Lassman Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2015-04-29 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Pierre Bady; Davide Sciuscio; Annie-Claire Diserens; Jocelyne Bloch; Martin J van den Bent; Christine Marosi; Pierre-Yves Dietrich; Michael Weller; Luigi Mariani; Frank L Heppner; David R Mcdonald; Denis Lacombe; Roger Stupp; Mauro Delorenzi; Monika E Hegi Journal: Acta Neuropathol Date: 2012-07-19 Impact factor: 17.088
Authors: Quinn T Ostrom; Luc Bauchet; Faith G Davis; Isabelle Deltour; James L Fisher; Chelsea Eastman Langer; Melike Pekmezci; Judith A Schwartzbaum; Michelle C Turner; Kyle M Walsh; Margaret R Wrensch; Jill S Barnholtz-Sloan Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2014-07 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Andrew L Lin; Jingxia Liu; John Evans; Eric C Leuthardt; Keith M Rich; Ralph G Dacey; Joshua L Dowling; Albert H Kim; Gregory J Zipfel; Robert L Grubb; Jiayi Huang; Clifford G Robinson; Joseph R Simpson; Gerald P Linette; Michael R Chicoine; David D Tran Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2013-11-26 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Michael Weller; Roger Stupp; Monika E Hegi; Martin van den Bent; Joerg C Tonn; Marc Sanson; Wolfgang Wick; Guido Reifenberger Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2012-09 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Rutger K Balvers; Anne Kleijn; Jenneke J Kloezeman; Pim J French; Andreas Kremer; Martin J van den Bent; Clemens M F Dirven; Sieger Leenstra; Martine L M Lamfers Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2013-09-17 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Katherine S Panageas; Anne S Reiner; Fabio M Iwamoto; Timothy F Cloughesy; Kenneth D Aldape; Andreana L Rivera; April F Eichler; David N Louis; Nina A Paleologos; Barbara J Fisher; Lynn S Ashby; J Gregory Cairncross; Gloria B Roldán Urgoiti; Patrick Y Wen; Keith L Ligon; David Schiff; H Ian Robins; Brandon G Rocque; Marc C Chamberlain; Warren P Mason; Susan A Weaver; Richard M Green; Francois G Kamar; Lauren E Abrey; Lisa M DeAngelis; Suresh C Jhanwar; Marc K Rosenblum; Andrew B Lassman Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2014-07-04 Impact factor: 12.300