Literature DB >> 17041097

Quantitative analysis of O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase in malignant glioma.

Jill A Maxwell1, Stewart P Johnson, Jennifer A Quinn, Roger E McLendon, Francis Ali-Osman, Allan H Friedman, James E Herndon, Katja Bierau, Joseph Bigley, Darell D Bigner, Henry S Friedman.   

Abstract

Promoter hypermethylation of the DNA repair protein O(6)-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase (AGT) has been associated with an enhanced response to chloroethylating and methylating agents in patients with malignant glioma. The purpose of this study was to compare three distinct yet related indices for measuring AGT to determine if these assays could be used interchangeably when AGT status is to be used to guide chemotherapeutic decisions. Real-time methylation-specific PCR (MSP), assessed as the ratio of methylated AGT copies to internal beta-actin control, was used to quantitate AGT hypermethylation in 32 glioma samples. Data were compared with AGT enzyme activity as well as immunohistochemical detection of AGT protein from the same samples. Hypermethylation of the AGT promoter was detected in 19 of 31 (61%) samples evaluable by MSP. Low-level AGT, defined as <20% nuclear AGT staining by immunohistochemistry, was found in 10 of 32 samples (31%), whereas 12 of 32 (38%) had low levels of AGT activity. Correlation of immunohistochemistry to AGT activity was statistically significant (P = 0.014) as was the correlation of immunohistochemistry to MSP (P = 0.043), whereas MSP compared with AGT activity (P = 0.246) was not significant. Cross-tabulation of immunohistochemistry and MSP data based on prognostic groups, where good prognosis was represented by an immunohistochemistry of <20% and an MSP ratio >12, showed no significant relationship (P = 0.214), suggesting that one assay cannot be used interchangeably for another. The observed discordance between respective measures of AGT based on prognosis supports further standardization of AGT assays designed to guide therapeutic practice. The data also suggest that consideration be given to the large population of AGT-expressing cells within samples when therapeutic strategies based on tumor methylation are used.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17041097     DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-06-0106

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther        ISSN: 1535-7163            Impact factor:   6.261


  29 in total

1.  Usefulness of MS-MLPA for detection of MGMT promoter methylation in the evaluation of pseudoprogression in glioblastoma patients.

Authors:  Chul-Kee Park; JinWook Kim; Su Youn Yim; Ah Reum Lee; Jung Ho Han; Chae-Yong Kim; Sung-Hye Park; Tae Min Kim; Se-Hoon Lee; Seung Hong Choi; Seung-Ki Kim; Dong Gyu Kim; Hee-Won Jung
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 12.300

2.  Correlation between quantified promoter methylation and enzymatic activity of O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase in glioblastomas.

Authors:  Yugo Kishida; Atsushi Natsume; Hiroshi Toda; Yuki Toi; Kazuya Motomura; Hiroko Koyama; Keiji Matsuda; Osamu Nakayama; Makoto Sato; Masaaki Suzuki; Yutaka Kondo; Toshihiko Wakabayashi
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2012-01-26

3.  Mismatch repair deficiency does not mediate clinical resistance to temozolomide in malignant glioma.

Authors:  Jill A Maxwell; Stewart P Johnson; Roger E McLendon; David W Lister; Krystle S Horne; Ahmed Rasheed; Jennifer A Quinn; Francis Ali-Osman; Allan H Friedman; Paul L Modrich; Darell D Bigner; Henry S Friedman
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2008-08-01       Impact factor: 12.531

4.  "MGMT for pt mgmt": is methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase testing ready for patient management?

Authors:  A John Iafrate; David N Louis
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2008-06-13       Impact factor: 5.568

5.  Cell type specificity of signaling: view from membrane receptors distribution and their downstream transduction networks.

Authors:  Ying He; Zhonghao Yu; Dongya Ge; Rui Wang-Sattler; Hans-Jürgen Thiesen; Lu Xie; Yixue Li
Journal:  Protein Cell       Date:  2012-07-16       Impact factor: 14.870

Review 6.  MGMT testing allows for personalised therapy in the temozolomide era.

Authors:  A Dullea; L Marignol
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2015-10-30

Review 7.  O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase in glioma therapy: promise and problems.

Authors:  John R Silber; Michael S Bobola; A Blank; Marc C Chamberlain
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2012-01-08

8.  Correlation of histomorphologic prognostic markers and proliferative index with loss of heterozygosity 1p/19q and MGMT status in diffusely infiltrating gliomas.

Authors:  Prabal Deb; N S Mani; S M Sudumbrekar; Nitin Taneja; Seema Patrikar
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2012-12-01

9.  Identification of MGMT promoter methylation sites correlating with gene expression and IDH1 mutation in gliomas.

Authors:  Jie Zhang; Jian-Hui Yang; Jia Quan; Xing Kang; Hui-Juan Wang; Peng-Gao Dai
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2016-07-28

10.  Extent of MGMT promoter methylation correlates with outcome in glioblastomas given temozolomide and radiotherapy.

Authors:  J Dunn; A Baborie; F Alam; K Joyce; M Moxham; R Sibson; D Crooks; D Husband; A Shenoy; A Brodbelt; H Wong; T Liloglou; B Haylock; C Walker
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-06-16       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.