Literature DB >> 31820799

Grazing behavior and production characteristics among cows differing in residual feed intake while grazing late season Idaho rangeland.

James E Sprinkle1,2, J Bret Taylor3, Patrick E Clark4, John B Hall1,2, Nicole K Strong3, Meghan C Roberts-Lew2.   

Abstract

The objectives were to determine whether cows previously classified during a postweaning test as either low or high residual feed intake (LRFI or HRFI) differed in BW, BCS, and winter grazing activity while consuming poor-quality forage. Thirty Hereford × Angus (LRFI = 16; HRFI = 14) 2-yr-old mid- to late-gestation cows (pregnant with second calf) grazed sagebrush steppe for 78 d beginning 29 September 2015. BW and BCS were collected before and after grazing. Five cows of each RFI classification were fitted with global positioning system (GPS) collars on 16 November 2015 with data collection commencing 3 d later and continuing for 25 d in a 323-ha pasture. The GPS units collected location coordinates every 2 min from which total daily travel distance (DTD) was calculated. Visual counts for bite rate were obtained from collared cows over 8 d. Coordinate data, daily bite rate, BW, and BCS were analyzed as repeated measures using a mixed model, which included RFI group, day, and RFI group × day as fixed effects and cow within RFI group as the random effect. Change in BW and BCS was analyzed by ANOVA with RFI group as the main effect. Cow BCS and BW differed for both day (P < 0.0001) and day × RFI (P < 0.05). Body condition was less (P < 0.05) in LRFI cows at the beginning (5.8 ± 0.13 vs. 6.2 ± 0.14 BCS), but similar (P = 0.67) to HRFI at the end of the study (4.6 ± 0.13 vs. 4.6 ± 0.14). BW among the RFI groups did not differ (P = 0.20) prior to going to range. However, BW-change and BCS-change differed (P < 0.05) between RFI groups. Not only did the LRFI cows lose less BW (-50.0 ± 5.41 kg vs. -66.6 ± 5.78 kg) over the trial, they also were less variable with respect to BW loss. Cows did not differ (P > 0.21) by RFI for DTD or bite rate, but day was significant (P < 0.0001) with cows increasing bite rate as the season of year progressed (55.2 ± 5.63 bites/min for day 4 vs. 84.8 ± 5.32 bites/min for day 21) and increasing DTD as snow storms occurred. Although LRFI cows were leaner than HRFI cows at the commencement of the project, they lost less BW in a late season rangeland environment.
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  beef cattle; global positioning system; grazing behavior; rangeland; residual feed intake

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31820799      PMCID: PMC6986444          DOI: 10.1093/jas/skz371

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  12 in total

1.  Factors affecting the utilization of 'poor-quality' forages by ruminants particularly under tropical conditions.

Authors:  R A Leng
Journal:  Nutr Res Rev       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 7.800

2.  The relationship of feeding behavior to residual feed intake in crossbred Angus steers fed traditional and no-roughage diets.

Authors:  J W Golden; M S Kerley; W H Kolath
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2007-09-04       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Factors affecting beef cattle producer perspectives on feed efficiency.

Authors:  J D Wulfhorst; J K Ahola; S L Kane; L D Keenan; R A Hill
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2010-07-09       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Digesta kinetics, energy intake, grazing behavior, and body temperature of grazing beef cattle differing in adaptation to heat.

Authors:  J E Sprinkle; J W Holloway; B G Warrington; W C Ellist; J W Stuth; T D Forbes; L W Greene
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  Determination of selenium in feeds and premixes: collaborative study.

Authors:  I S Palmer; N Thiex
Journal:  J AOAC Int       Date:  1997 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.913

6.  Grazed grass herbage intake and performance of beef heifers with predetermined phenotypic residual feed intake classification.

Authors:  P Lawrence; D A Kenny; B Earley; M McGee
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Joint Alpharma-Beef Species Symposium: interactions of feed efficiency with beef heifer reproductive development.

Authors:  R D Randel; T H Welsh
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 3.159

8.  Energy utilization by mature, nonpregnant, nonlactating cows of different types.

Authors:  C L Ferrell; T G Jenkins
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 3.159

9.  Critical re-appraisal of fluorometric method for determination of selenium in biological materials.

Authors:  T S Koh; T H Benson
Journal:  J Assoc Off Anal Chem       Date:  1983-07

10.  The effect of residual feed intake classification on forage intake by grazing beef cows.

Authors:  A M Meyer; M S Kerley; R L Kallenbach
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2008-04-11       Impact factor: 3.159

View more
  4 in total

1.  Grazing behavior and production for lactating cows differing in residual feed intake while grazing spring and summer rangeland.

Authors:  James E Sprinkle; Melinda J Ellison; John B Hall; Joel V Yelich; Carmen M Willmore; Jameson R Brennan
Journal:  Transl Anim Sci       Date:  2021-04-07

Review 2.  Factors Affecting Site Use Preference of Grazing Cattle Studied from 2000 to 2020 through GPS Tracking: A Review.

Authors:  M Jordana Rivero; Patricia Grau-Campanario; Siobhan Mullan; Suzanne D E Held; Jessica E Stokes; Michael R F Lee; Laura M Cardenas
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-11       Impact factor: 3.576

3.  Characterization of grazing behaviour microstructure using point-of-view cameras.

Authors:  Elvira Sales-Baptista; Maria Isabel Ferraz-de-Oliveira; Marina Terra-Braga; José António Lopes de Castro; João Serrano; Manuel Cancela d'Abreu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  The Influence of Residual Feed Intake and Cow Age on Beef Cattle Performance, Supplement Intake, Resource Use, and Grazing Behavior on Winter Mixed-Grass Rangelands.

Authors:  Cory T Parsons; Julia M Dafoe; Samuel A Wyffels; Timothy DelCurto; Darrin L Boss
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-23       Impact factor: 2.752

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.