Literature DB >> 6698902

Energy utilization by mature, nonpregnant, nonlactating cows of different types.

C L Ferrell, T G Jenkins.   

Abstract

Four types of crossbred cows were used in each of two studies designed to estimate the metabolizable energy (ME) required to maintain weight or energy equilibrium of mature (9-yr-old), nonpregnant, nonlactating cows. The four cow types were chosen to represent cow types having moderate mature size-moderate milk production potential (Angus X Hereford, Hereford X Angus; AHX), large mature size-moderate milk production potential (Charolais X Angus or Hereford; CX), small mature size-high milk production potential (Jersey X Angus or Hereford; JX) and large mature size-high milk production potential (Simmental X Angus or Hereford; SX). In each of two consecutive years, four cows of each type were assigned randomly and fed individually either a low (113 kcal ME X kg-.75 X d-1), medium (178 kcal ME X kg-.75 X d-1) or a high (ad libitum) level of a corn silage-based diet for 140 d. Body composition of each cow was estimated by deuterium oxide dilution techniques at d 0 and 140 of each study and gains were calculated. The ME required to maintain weight or energy equilibrium was estimated for each type of cow. Estimates of ME required to maintain energy equilibrium (from the regression of log heat production, kcal X kg-.75 X d-1 on ME intake kcal X kg-.75 X d-1) were 130, 129, 145 and 160 kcal X kg-.75 X d-1 for AHX, CX, JX, and SX cows, respectively. Similar trends were observed when other models were used. Cow types with higher milk production potential had higher maintenance (kcal X kg-.75 X d-1) than cows with lower milk production potential. Cows of larger size had maintenance requirements (kcal X kg-.75 X d-1) similar to those of smaller size. Possible reasons for these differences as well as their potential impact on cow efficiency are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6698902     DOI: 10.2527/jas1984.581234x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  9 in total

1.  Enhanced mitochondrial complex gene function and reduced liver size may mediate improved feed efficiency of beef cattle during compensatory growth.

Authors:  Erin E Connor; Stanislaw Kahl; Theodore H Elsasser; Joel S Parker; Robert W Li; Curtis P Van Tassell; Ransom L Baldwin; Scott M Barao
Journal:  Funct Integr Genomics       Date:  2009-09-24       Impact factor: 3.410

2.  The effects of metabolizable energy intake on body fat depots of adult Pelibuey ewes fed roughage diets under tropical conditions.

Authors:  A J Chay-Canul; A J Ayala-Burgos; J C Ku-Vera; J G Magaña-Monforte; L O Tedeschi
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2011-01-16       Impact factor: 1.559

3.  Comparison of different functions to describe growth from weaning to maturity in crossbred beef cattle1.

Authors:  Madeline J Zimmermann; Larry A Kuehn; Matthew L Spangler; R Mark Thallman; Warren M Snelling; Ronald M Lewis
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-04-03       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Rumen fluid metabolomics of beef steers differing in feed efficiency.

Authors:  Brooke A Clemmons; Joshua B Powers; Shawn R Campagna; Taylor B Seay; Mallory M Embree; Phillip R Myer
Journal:  Metabolomics       Date:  2020-01-27       Impact factor: 4.290

5.  Grazing behavior and production characteristics among cows differing in residual feed intake while grazing late season Idaho rangeland.

Authors:  James E Sprinkle; J Bret Taylor; Patrick E Clark; John B Hall; Nicole K Strong; Meghan C Roberts-Lew
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-01-01       Impact factor: 3.159

6.  Maintenance Energy Requirements of Double-Muscled Belgian Blue Beef Cows.

Authors:  Leo O Fiems; Johan L De Boever; José M Vanacker; Sam De Campeneere
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2015-02-13       Impact factor: 2.752

7.  Performance and muscle lipogenesis of calves born to Nellore cows with different residual feed intake classification.

Authors:  Ana Carolina Almeida Rollo de Paz; Márcio Machado Ladeira; Priscilla Dutra Teixeira; Roberta Carrilho Canesin; Camila Delveaux Araujo Batalha; Maria Eugênia Zerlotti Mercadante; Sarah Figueiredo Martins Bonilha
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-29       Impact factor: 3.752

8.  Retained energy in lactating beef cows; effects on maintenance energy requirement and voluntary feed intake.

Authors:  Emma A Briggs; Amanda L Holder; Megan A Gross; Alexandra N Moehlenpah; Jared D Taylor; R R Reuter; Andrew P Foote; Carla L Goad; David L Lalman
Journal:  Transl Anim Sci       Date:  2022-08-25

9.  How much energetic trade-offs limit selection? Insights from livestock and related laboratory model species.

Authors:  Frédéric Douhard; Mathieu Douhard; Hélène Gilbert; Philippe Monget; Jean-Michel Gaillard; Jean-François Lemaître
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2021-11-28       Impact factor: 5.183

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.