Literature DB >> 20622178

Factors affecting beef cattle producer perspectives on feed efficiency.

J D Wulfhorst1, J K Ahola, S L Kane, L D Keenan, R A Hill.   

Abstract

To establish the basis for implementation of a producer education program, a social assessment of the willingness and barriers to adoption of a measure of feed efficiency in beef cattle [residual feed intake (RFI)] was conducted. A 35-question mailed survey was sent to 1,888 producers acquired from the stratified random sample of the Idaho Cattle Association member list (n = 488), Red Angus Association of America member list (n = 2,208), and Red Angus Association of America bull buyer list (n = 5,325). The adjusted response rate for the survey was 49.9%. Of the survey respondents, 58.7% were commercial cow/calf producers and 41.3% were seedstock producers or operated a combination seedstock/commercial operation. Commercial operations had an average of 223 ± 17 cows and 13 ± 3 bulls, whereas seedstock herds (including combination herds) had slightly fewer cows (206 ± 24) and more bulls (23 ± 6). Both commercial and seedstock operators indicated that calving ease/birth weight was the most important trait used to evaluate genetic merit of breeding bulls. Only 3.8 and 4.8% of commercial and seedstock producers indicated that feed efficiency was the most important characteristic used for bull selection. Binary logistic regression models were used to predict willingness of seedstock producers to begin collecting data for the calculation of RFI on their bulls, or to predict willingness of commercial producers to begin selecting bulls based on RFI data. In response, 49.1% of commercial producers and 43.6% of seedstock producers indicated they were willing to adopt RFI as a measure of feed efficiency. These data indicate that feed efficiency was one of the traits that producers consider important; those who perceive feed efficiency as important tended to be actively involved in data collection on their herds, underpinning the notion that objective assessment was valued and used by some. Additional data collection in a future social assessment will continue to elaborate the proportion of producers who perceive feed efficiency as an increasingly important decision and management tool for beef production.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20622178     DOI: 10.2527/jas.2010-2907

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  3 in total

1.  Grazing behavior and production characteristics among cows differing in residual feed intake while grazing late season Idaho rangeland.

Authors:  James E Sprinkle; J Bret Taylor; Patrick E Clark; John B Hall; Nicole K Strong; Meghan C Roberts-Lew
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-01-01       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Reducing GHG emissions through genetic improvement for feed efficiency: effects on economically important traits and enteric methane production.

Authors:  J A Basarab; K A Beauchemin; V S Baron; K H Ominski; L L Guan; S P Miller; J J Crowley
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Single nucleotide polymorphisms for feed efficiency and performance in crossbred beef cattle.

Authors:  Mohammed K Abo-Ismail; Gordon Vander Voort; James J Squires; Kendall C Swanson; Ira B Mandell; Xiaoping Liao; Paul Stothard; Stephen Moore; Graham Plastow; Stephen P Miller
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2014-01-30       Impact factor: 2.797

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.