Literature DB >> 10875645

Digesta kinetics, energy intake, grazing behavior, and body temperature of grazing beef cattle differing in adaptation to heat.

J E Sprinkle1, J W Holloway, B G Warrington, W C Ellist, J W Stuth, T D Forbes, L W Greene.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine whether digesta kinetics, energy intake (EI, kcal ME intake x kg(-.75) x d(-1)), grazing behavior, or body temperature differed by breed, lactational state, or season of the year among cattle presumed to vary in adaptability to the subtropics. Two-year-old lactating and nonlactating Brahman x Angus (BA; n = 5, n = 5), Tuli x Angus (TA; n = 5, n = 4), and Angus (A; n = 4, n = 4) cows were used. During both early (ES) and late summer (LS), lactating cattle vs nonlactating cattle had greater gastrointestinal tract load (CM2) and EI (P < .01), although passage rate did not differ (P > .48). During LS, lactating cattle had decreased early morning rectal temperatures (P < .05) and spent more time grazing during the day compared with nonlactating cattle (P < .001). Among breeds, A had the largest CM2 (P < .01 compared with BA and P = .068 compared with TA) and accumulated the greatest heat during the day (P < .05). Due to greater daytime shading (P < .01) and less daytime grazing (P < .05), A had lower (P < .05) early morning and comparable (P > .26) late afternoon rectal temperatures compared with BA and TA. With data pooled over both grazing trials, BA cattle had the smallest CM2 (P < .01), and in ES they spent the least amount of time in the shade (P < .001). The TA spent more time in the shade than did BA (P < .001) during ES and less during LS (P < .001) and had similar (P > .28) early morning rectal temperatures compared with BA during ES and LS. During LS, TA spent more time in the sun and less time in the shade than did either A or BA (P < .001). During ES, EI did not differ among breeds (P > .50). During LS, EI for lactating A was greater than for BA and TA (P < .05), and EI for nonlactating BA was less than for A and TA (P < .05). Bite rate per minute for lactating cattle during ES was reduced (P < .03) by increased body condition score. Tuli x Angus cattle appear to be comparable to BA with respect to heat adaptation. It appears that EI demands are greater in a hot environment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10875645     DOI: 10.2527/2000.7861608x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  5 in total

1.  Efficacy of reflective insulation in reducing heat stress on dairy calves housed in polyethylene calf hutches.

Authors:  B H Carter; T H Friend; S M Garey; J A Sawyer; M B Alexander; M A Tomazewski
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2013-01-17       Impact factor: 3.787

2.  Grazing behavior and production for lactating cows differing in residual feed intake while grazing spring and summer rangeland.

Authors:  James E Sprinkle; Melinda J Ellison; John B Hall; Joel V Yelich; Carmen M Willmore; Jameson R Brennan
Journal:  Transl Anim Sci       Date:  2021-04-07

3.  Grazing behavior and production characteristics among cows differing in residual feed intake while grazing late season Idaho rangeland.

Authors:  James E Sprinkle; J Bret Taylor; Patrick E Clark; John B Hall; Nicole K Strong; Meghan C Roberts-Lew
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-01-01       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Is summer food intake a limiting factor for boreal browsers? Diet, temperature, and reproduction as drivers of consumption in female moose.

Authors:  Rachel D Shively; John A Crouse; Dan P Thompson; Perry S Barboza
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Effects of a long-acting trace mineral rumen bolus upon range cow productivity.

Authors:  James E Sprinkle; David W Schafer; S Peder Cuneo; Douglas R Tolleson; R Mark Enns
Journal:  Transl Anim Sci       Date:  2020-12-24
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.