| Literature DB >> 31816948 |
Ari Satia Nugraha1,2, Yuvita Dian Damayanti1, Phurpa Wangchuk3, Paul A Keller2.
Abstract
Annona species have been a valuable source of anti-infective and anticancer agents. However, only limited evaluations of their alkaloids have been carried out. This review collates and evaluates the biological data from extracts and purified isolates for their anti-infective and anti-cancer activities. An isoquinoline backbone is a major structural alkaloid moiety of the Annona genus, and more than 83 alkaloids have been isolated from this genus alone. Crude extracts of Annona genus are reported with moderate activities against Plasmodium falciparum showing larvicidal activities. However, no pure compounds from the Annona genus were tested against the parasite. The methanol extract of Annona muricata showed apparent antimicrobial activities. The isolated alkaloids from this genus including liriodenine, anonaine, asimilobine showed sensitivity against Staphylococcus epidermidis. Other alkaloids such as (+)-Xylopine and isocoreximine indicated significant anti-cancer activity against A549 and K-562 cell lines, respectively. This review revealed that the alkaloids from Annona genus are rich in structural diversity and pharmacological activities. Further exploration of this genus and their alkaloids has potential for developing novel anti-infective and anticancer drugs.Entities:
Keywords: Annona; alkaloid; anti-cancer; anti-malaria; anti-microbial; anti-protozoa
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31816948 PMCID: PMC6930583 DOI: 10.3390/molecules24234419
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Phytochemical study on Annona muricata. (a) Number of isolated compounds in different regions of the plants; (b) comparison between total isolated acetogenins and alkaloids.
Alkaloid Constituents of Annona.
| Plant Parts | Location | Isolated Alkaloids |
|---|---|---|
|
| ||
| Wood | Brazil | benzene-EtOH: cleistopholine |
|
| ||
| Leaves | Brazil | (−)-anonaine |
| Leaves | India | Phanostenine |
| Leaves | Spain | (−)-anonaine |
| Seeds | Spain | (−)-anonaine |
| Stem | Taiwan | (+)-annocherine A |
| Stem | Spain | (−)-anolobine |
| Root | Mexico | (−)-corytenchine |
|
| ||
| Roots | Mexico | Liriodenine |
|
| ||
| Fruit-stem | Taiwan | (−)-anonaine |
| Leaves | Mexico | (−)-anonaine |
| Leaves | Taiwan | (−)- |
| Root | Mexico | (−)-anonaine |
| Stem | Mexico | (−)-anonaine |
| Stem | Taiwan | (−)-anolobine |
| Leaves | Taiwan | annolatine |
| Stem-Root bark | Guinea | Annomontine |
| Stem bark | Japan | Annomontine |
| Leaves | Tanzania | (−)-anonaine |
| Japan | (−)-anonaine | |
| Leaves | Guinea | (−)-anonaine |
| Stem (bark) | Guinea | Anomurine |
| Roots | Indonesia | (−)-coclaurine |
| Root bark | Guiena | (−)-anonaine |
|
| ||
| Leaves | Taiwan | (−)-asimilobine |
| Roots | Taiwan | (−)-aequaline or (−)-discretamine |
| Bark | Brazil | (−)-anonaine |
|
| ||
| Leaves | (−)-3-hydroxynornuciferine | |
|
| ||
| Leaves | Brazil | (−)-anonaine |
| Leaves- stem bark | Guinea | (−)-anonaine |
| Leaves | India | (−)-anonaine |
| Leaves | Tanzania | (−)-anonaine |
| Leaves | Zimbabwe | (−)-isocorydine |
| Seeds | Brazil | (−)-anonaine |
| Stem | Taiwan | Annobraine |
| Roots | Taiwan | (−)-anolobine |
Figure 2Structures of Annona alkaloids (1–83).
Anti-protozoal activity of several extract of Annona muricata and Annona reticulata [68,69].
| Species | Part of Plant (Extract) | Anti-Protozoal Activity (IC50, µg/mL) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| |||||
| PH8 | M2903 | PP75 | F32 | W2 | |||
|
| LF (Hexane) | 100.0 | >100.0 | >100.0 | 100.0 | 7.2 a | 38.6 a |
| LF (EtOAc) | 25.0 | 25.0 | 25.0 | 25.0 | 8.5 a | 10.4 a | |
| LF (MeOH) | >100.0 | >100 | >100.0 | 100.0 | 9.2 a | 36.8 a | |
| SD (Hexane) | 98.6 | 76.3 | 83.1 | 74.9 | 11.4 a | 38.2 a | |
| SD (EtOAc) | 63.2 | 63.2 | 63.2 | 63.2 | 40.2 a | 34.7 a | |
| SD (MeOH) | 98.6 | 98.6 | 98.6 | 98.6 | 32.5 a | 26.3 a | |
| PC (EtOH) | 1.01 | ||||||
| PC (H2O) | >10 | ||||||
| PC (CH2Cl2) | 0.94 | ||||||
| RT (EtOH) | 0.79 | ||||||
| RT (H2O) | >10 | ||||||
| RT (CH2Cl2) | 0.19 | ||||||
| ST(EtOH) | 1.45 | ||||||
| ST (H2O) | >10 | ||||||
| ST (CH2Cl2) | 3.32 | ||||||
|
| LF(EtOH) | >10 | |||||
| LF (H2O) | >10 | ||||||
| LF (CH2Cl2) | >10 | ||||||
| TW (EtOH) | >10 | ||||||
| TW (H2O) | >10 | ||||||
| TW (CH2Cl2) | 0.88 | ||||||
| ST(EtOH) | 0.29 | ||||||
| ST (H2O) | >10 | ||||||
| ST (CH2Cl2) | 0.82 | ||||||
| RT (EtOH) | 1.90 | ||||||
| RT (H2O) | >10 | ||||||
| RT (CH2Cl2) | 0.38 | ||||||
| FR (EtOH) | 0.67 | ||||||
| RF (H2O) | >10 | ||||||
| RF (CH2Cl2) | 0.42 | ||||||
| Standard drug | Pentamidine | 10.0 | 10.0 | 10.0 | |||
| Amphotericin B | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | ||||
| Bensoidazole | 2.0 | ||||||
| Chloroquine | 0.01 | 0.9 | |||||
| Artemisisn | 0.005 | ||||||
LF: leaf; SD: seed, PC: pericarp; RT: root; ST: stem bark; TW: twig; Leishmania amazonensis (PH8); Leishmania braziliensis (M2903); Leishmania donovani PP75; a Values represent percentage of inhibition at 10.0 µg/mL.
Larvicidal of several extract of Annona genus [44,66,73,74,75,76].
| Plant Name | Plant Extract | LC50 (µg/mL) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| SB (hexane) | 192.57 | |||
| RW (hexane) | 154.02 | ||||
| RB (hexane) | 264.15 | ||||
| RB (EtOH) | 0.71 | ||||
| RW (EtOH) | 8.94 | ||||
| ST (EtOH) | 16.1 | ||||
|
| SD (EtOH) | 0.06 | |||
|
| RT (EtOH) | 42.3 | |||
| SD (hexane) | 122.77 | ||||
| SD (CHCl3) | 0.90 | ||||
| SD (MeOH) | 85.91 | ||||
| LF (MeOH) | 56.47 | ||||
|
| LF (MeOH) | 23.42 | |||
|
| RT (EtOH) | 31.9 | |||
| LF (EtOH) | 169 | 20.70 | |||
| SD (EtOH) | 5.12 | 6.96 | |||
| LF (MeOH) | 20.26 | 17.70 | |||
| SB (MeOH) | 104.94 | ||||
SB: stem bark; RB: root bark; RW: root wood; SD: seed; RT: root; LF: leaf.
Anti-microbial activities of crude extracts or fractions of Annona genus.
| Plant Name/Standards | Plant Extract | MIC (µg/mL) | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ST | PA | KP | BC | EC | SA | PS | XC | AT | PM | PC | EH | TV | NB a | MD a | BC b | AN c | AI c | SM c | PI c | PG c | ||
| LF (EtOH) | 9 b | 10 b | ||||||||||||||||||||
| SD (MeOH) | >100 | 15 | 5 | 8 | ||||||||||||||||||
| LF (EtOH) | 11b | 14b | ||||||||||||||||||||
| LF (H2O) | 4096 | 1024 | 512 | >1024 | >1024 | |||||||||||||||||
| SD (MeOH) | >100 | 30 | 26 | 25 | ||||||||||||||||||
| SB (EtOH) | 6.25 | 6.25 | 12.5 | |||||||||||||||||||
| STm (EtOH) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| RT (MeOH) | >32 | >32 | >32 | |||||||||||||||||||
| SD (EtOH) | >771 | >771 | >771 | >771 | >771 | |||||||||||||||||
| SD (Acetone) | >475 | >475 | >475 | >475 | >475 | |||||||||||||||||
| SD (MeOH) | 50 * | 50 * | 50 * | |||||||||||||||||||
| FR (MeOH) | 1250 * | 1250 * | 1250 * | |||||||||||||||||||
| BK (MeOH) | 4.5 | 5.0 | 3.0 | 2.5 | 6.5 | |||||||||||||||||
| Streptomycin | 10 | 10 | 20 | 10 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Chloramfenicol | RST | 30 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Metronidazole | 1.25 | 2.5 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Ivermictine | 0.8 | 1.3 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Neomycin | 312.5 | 312.5 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Gentamycin | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.01 | 0.12 | ||||||||||||||||||
RST: Resistance; a LD50 (µg/mL); b Inhibition zone (0.1 mg/disc, mm); c Inhibition zone (2 mg/disc, mm); LF:Leaf; SD: Seed; BK: Bark; STm: Stem; ST: Salmonella typhi; PA: Pseudomas aeruginosa; KP: Klebsiella pneumonia; EC: Escherichia coli 27; SA: Staphylococcus aureus 358; PS: Pseudomonas syringa e673; AT: Agrobacterium tumefaciens 431; XC: Xanthomonas campestris 2286; PC: Pectobacterium caratovorum 1428; PM: Pseudomonas marginalis 2758; AP: Aspergillus parasiticus 411; EH: Entamoeba histolytica; TV: Taenia vaginalis; NB: Nippostrongylus brasiliensis; Mollemades setae; BC: Bacilus subtilis; AN: Actinomyces naeslundii; AI: Actinomyces israelii; SM: Streptococcus mutans; PI: Privotella intermedia; PG: Porphyromonus gingivalis. * MIC was recorded in µg /mL.
Anti-microbial activities of alkaloids isolated from Annona genus.
| Compound | MIC (µg/mL) | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KZ | SA | Sap | SE | Sep | EF | EC | PA | CA | CP | CD | CDb | Fm | |
| - | |||||||||||||
| Liriodenine 11 | - | >500 | >500 | 50 | 50 | - | - | - | - | - | 50 | 100 | - |
| Anonaine 8 | 50 | >500 | 50 | 25 | 50 | - | - | - | - | - | 50 | 50 | - |
| Asimilobine 9 | 50 | >500 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 100 | - | - | >500 | >500 | >500 | 50 | - |
| Reticuline 19 | 250 | >500 | >500 | 100 | 100 | 250 | - | - | 100 | 100 | >500 | >500 | - |
| (−)-( | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 30–39 * |
| Cleistopholine 1 | - | - | - | 250 | 250 | 250 | - | - | - | - | - | 250 | - |
| Chloramphenicol | 50 | 25 | 25 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 850 | 12.5 | 12.5 | 12.5 | 12.5 | - |
-: no data available; KZ: Kocuriarhizophila (ATCC 9341); SA: Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC14458); SAp:S. aureuspenicilinase-(8-); SE: Staphylococcus epidermidis (ATCC 12228); Sep; S. epidermidis (6ep); EF: Enterococcus faecalis (Ef); EC: Escherichia coli (ATCC 10538); PA: Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATCC 27853)c; CA: Candida albicans (ATCC 10231); CA: Candida albicans(ATCC 10231); CP: Candida parapsilosis (ATCC 22019); CD: Candida dubliniensis (ATCC 777); CDb Candida dubliniensis (ATCC 778157); FM: Fusarium moniliforme. * inhibition diameter in mm.
Anticancer/cytotoxicityactivities ofalkaloids that were obtained from non-Annona genera.
| Alkaloid | Plants | Part of Plant | Country | Anticancer Activity | Ref(s) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (−)-Anonaine | Leaves | Taiwan | Anti-proliferative effects with IC50 > 500 µM against AGS and 150.1 ± 0.3 µM against DU-145 | [ | |
| Leaves | Taiwan | Inhibited viability of HeLa cancer cells (23 ± 1%) more effectively than non-cancer cells (Vero and MDCK cells, 75 ± 3% and 95 ± 4%, respectively) at concentration of 100 µM. | [ | ||
| Annomontine | Sponges | Indonesia | Pronounced cytotoxicity against L5178Y cell line with ED50 7.8 µg/mL compared to the positive control kahalalide F (ED50 6.3 μg/mL) | [ | |
| Sponges | Indonesia | Pronounced cytotoxicity against L5178Y cell line with EC50 0.49 µg/mL | [ | ||
| Artabonatine B | Roots, stems, and leaves | Taiwan | Active against both Hep G2 and 2,2,15 cell lines with IC50 9.1 and 11.0 µg/mL, respectively | [ | |
| (−)-Asimilobine | Leaves | Taiwan | Anti-proliferative effects against AGS and DU-145 cell lines with IC50 > 500 µM | [ | |
| Cleistopholine | Fruits | Taiwan | Displayed potent cytotoxicity against Hep G2 (human hepatoma cell) and Hep 2,2,15 (Hep G2 cell line transfected with hepatitis B virus) cell lines with IC50 value of 0.22 µg/mL and 0.54 µg/mL, respectively | [ | |
| Roots | Malaysia | Active against CAOV-3 and SKOV-3 with IC50 value of 61.4 μM and 67.3 μM, respectively. This was comparable with that of the positive control cisplatin (62.8 μM and 67.1 μM) at 24 h of treatment. Cleistopholine (1) at >200 μM showed less cytotoxic effect against normal ovarian cells (SV40). | [ | ||
| Stems | China | Inactive against against BEL-7402, SGC-7901, and K-562 cell lines | [ | ||
| (−)-Corydine | Whole plant | China | Showed its cytotoxicity against H1299, MCF-7, and SMCC-7721 with IC50 > 100 µM | [ | |
| Aerial parts | Ghana | Exhibited cytotoxic activity against KB cell line with IC50 733 μM | [ | ||
| (−)-Corydine | Stem | Ghana | (−)-Corydine 29 showed DNA-damaging activity in the yeast bioassay (IC50 values YCp50 gal, pRAD52 GAL, Prad52 GLU were27.5, >73.9, and 22.5 μg/mL, respectively | [ | |
| Root | India | Three different concentrations (20, 10, 5 µg/mL) could all significantly increase the apoptosis rate (8.77%, 9.12%, and 12.38%, respectively) of NCI-H446 cells after 48 h of treatment compared to the control group (1.02%). (−)-Corydine 29 can inhibit the proliferation of lung cancer NCI-H446 cells and induce their apoptosis | [ | ||
| Corytuberine | Whole plant | China | Cytotoxicity against H1299, MCF-7, and SMCC-7721 with IC50 value of 53.58 ± 5.47 µM, 72.30 ± 1.72 µM, and 73.22 ± 2.35 µM, respectively | [ | |
| Demethylsonodione | Trunk bark | Taiwan | Exhibited cytotoxic activity against P-388, KB16, A549 (human lung adenocarcinoma), and HT-29 (human colon carcinoma cell lines with ED50 value of 0.766, 0.507, 0.223, and 0.772 µg/mL | [ | |
| Dielsiquinone | Stem bark | Thailand | Showed cytotoxic activity against A549, HT029, MCF7, RPMI and U251 with ED50 value of 0.11, 1.12, 0.11, 0.11 and 0.37 µM, respectively | [ | |
| Glaucine | Whole plant | Benin | Active compound against HeLa cell line with IC50 value of 8.2 µM | [ | |
| Leaves | Egypt | Showed cytotoxic activity against HepG2, MCF7, HCT116, and A549 cell lines with % of inhibition of cell viability of 38.4%, 46.3%, 66.8%, and 17.3%, respectively (at concentration of 100 µg/mL) | [ | ||
| Tuber | Korea | Showed cytotoxic activity against A549, SK-OV-3, SK-MEL-2 and HCT-15 cell lines with IC50 value of 26.76 ± 3.82, 21.57 ± 1.01, 20.39 ± 1.45 and 18.63 ± 4.15 µM, respectively | [ | ||
| Isocoreximine | Bark | Brazil | Showed anti-proliferative activity against UACC-62, MCF-7, NCI-H460, OVCAR-03, PC-3, HT-29, alagnd 786-0 with TGI value of >764.52 µM, and NCI-ADR/RES (TGI 131.50 µM). This compound showed selective activity for ovarian expressing phenotype for multiple drug resistance (NCI-ADR/RES) with a TGI value of 131.50 µM, but was less active than doxorubicin (TGI value of 14.80 µM) | [ | |
| (+)-Isocorydine | Whole plant | Benin | Inactive against HeLa cell with IC50 > 80 µM | [ | |
| Aerial parts | Turkey | Nontoxic against normal Vero cell with IC50 value of >300 μg/mL | [ | ||
| Lanuginosine | Leaves | Egypt | Exhibited cytotoxicity against U251 and HEPG2 with IC50 value of 4 μg/mL and 2.5 μg/mL, respectively. Lanuginosine 10 was found to be inactive against the HeLa cancer cell. | [ | |
| Liriodenine | Stem bark | Thailand | Exhibit the growth of NCIH187, BC, and KB cell lines with IC50 values at 1.02, 13.45 and 14.57 µg/mL, respectively | [ | |
| Fruits | China | Exhibit strong cytotoxic effect against A375, BEL-7402, and HeLa cell lines with IC50 value of 5.38 ± 0.27, 6.61 ± 0.57, and 5.97 ± 0.39 µg/mL, respectively | [ | ||
| Stem bark | Bangladesh | Show cytotoxic activity based on brine shrimp method with LC50 value of 4.89 μg/mL | [ | ||
| Roots | Malaysia | Found to be similarly and moderately cytotoxic against MCF-7 ADR MDA-MB435 and MT-1 cells lines with IC50 values of 15.6, 16.7, 6.4 and 18.2 µM, respectively | [ | ||
| Stem | China | Cytotoxic activity against GSC-7901, K562, and SPCA-1 cell lines with IC50 value of of 3.87, 37.61, and 6.19 µM, respectively | [ | ||
| Root | Malaysia | Inhibited CAOV-3 cell growth with IC50 value of.3 ± 1.06 µM after 24 h of exposure. Exhibited less activity against SKOV-3 cells, with IC50 values of 68.0 ± 1.56 µM. | [ | ||
| Leaves | Philippines | Effective antiproliferative effects against HUVEC and K-562 cell lines with GI50 value of 8.2 ± 0.3 and 6.1 ± 0.8, respectively. | [ | ||
| Liriodenine | Stem bark | Brazil | Anticancer potent against B16-F10 (mouse melanoma), HepG2 (human hepatocellular carcinoma), HL-60 (human promyelocytic leukemia), and K562 (human chronic myelocytic leukemia) tumor cell lines with IC50 values of >10, 8.3, 5.5, and 5.0 μM for the respectively | [ | |
| Bark | Brazil | Showed anti-proliferative activity against UACC-62, MCF-7, NCI-H460, OVCAR-03, PC-3, HT-29, 786-0 and NCI-ADR/RES with TGI value of 63.02, 37.67, 87.41, 372.18, >909.09, >909.09, >909.09 and >909.09 µM, respectively. This compound undermined positive control doxorubicin against MCF-7 with TGI value of 46.04 µM. | [ | ||
| Stem bark | Thailand | Found to be active against KB and P388 cell lines with ED50 value of of 1.7 and 0.8 µg/mL, respectively | [ | ||
| Stem bark | Thailand | Indicated cytotoxic activity against KB and P388 cell lines with with ED50 value of <2.5 µg/mL | [ | ||
| Heartwood | Taiwan | Exhibited powerful inhibitory activity against TW01, H226, Jurkat, A498, A549, and HT1080 carcinoma cell lines with IC50 value of were 8.99, 14.71, 15.7, 4.52, 8.82 and 9.75 μM, respectively | [ | ||
| Roots | Taiwan | Possessed cytotoxicity against B16F10 cells after 24 h treatment at high concentration (100 μM) with 80% of cell viability. | [ | ||
| Branche | Vitenam | Showed low activity against HT-29 cancer cell line with IC50 values greater than 10 μM. | [ | ||
| Leaves and branches | Vietnam | Indicated a good activity against MCF-7, KB, LU and Hep-G2 cancer cell lines with IC50 value of 2.89, 2.30, 6.66 and 5.23 μg/mL, respectively | [ | ||
| Leaves | Taiwan | Showed anti-proliferative effects against AGS and DU-145 cell lines with IC50 value of >500 and 95.4 ± 0.4 µM, respectively | [ | ||
| Bark | Taiwan | Showed activity against MCF-7 (breast cancer) and MDA-MB-231 cell line with IC50 value of 4.46 and 10.28 µg/mL, respectively | [ | ||
| Liriodenine | Aerial part | Thailand | Strongly cytotoxic to KB and BC cell lines with IC50 2.4 µg/mL and 2.3 µg/mL, respectively | [ | |
| Stems | China | Exhibit cytotoxic activities against BEL-7402, SGC-7901, and K-562 cell lines with IC50 value of 71.7, 33.7, and 197.7 µM, respectively | [ | ||
| Aerial parts | Ghana | Exhibit cytotoxic activity against KB cell line with IC50 value of 26.9 ± 2.4 μM | [ | ||
| Stem | Ghana | Showed DNA-damaging activity in the yeast bioassay against YCp50 gal, pRAD52 GAL, Prad52 GLU with IC50 value of 0.6, 1.5, and 0.5 μg/mL, respectively. | [ | ||
| Stem | Bolivia | Possessed cytotoxic bioactivity against Vero cell line with IC50 value of 1 μg/mL | [ | ||
| Stem bark | China | Exhibit cytotoxicity against three human cancer cell lines HT29, A549 and MDA-MB-231 with IC50 values of 9.12, 6.05, and 11.35 μM, respectively | [ | ||
| Stem bark | Taiwan | Exhibit moderate cytotoxicity against MCF-7, NCI-H460, and SF-268 cancer cell lines with IC50 values of 3.19, 2.38, and 2.19, respectively. Liriodenine (11) was the most cytotoxic isolate in | [ | ||
| (+)-Nornuciferine | Stem bark | Brazil | Anti-proliferative activity against MCF-7 NCI-H460 PC-3 HT-29786-0 K562 and NCI-ADR/RES with TGI value of 215.58, 201.99, 542.38, 191.38, 615.23, 153.88 and 255.37 µM, respectively. | [ | |
| Leaves | Taiwan | Anti-proliferative effects against AGS and DU-145 cell lines with IC50 value of >500 µM | [ | ||
| Leaves | Malaysia | Cytotoxic activity against NIH/3T3, HeLa and HL-60 with CD50 value of 17, 15 and 37 µg/mL, respectively. | [ | ||
| (+)-Reticuline | Whole plant | Taiwan | Cytotoxic effects against HONE-1 (96% of control) and NUGC (90% of control) at concentration of 150 µM | [ | |
| Stem bark | Malaysia | Cytotoxicity activities against A549 (IC50 > 200 µg/mL), A375 (IC50 97.600 µg/mL), and BxPC-3 (IC50 82.570 µg/mL) | [ | ||
| Trunk bark | Taiwan | Anticancer activity against P-388, KB16, A549 (human lung adenocarcinoma), and HT-29 (human colon carcinoma cell lines with ED50 > 50 µg/mL | [ | ||
| Roemerine | Leaves | Taiwan | Showed anti-proliferative effects against AGS and DU-145with IC50 value of >500 and 95.4 ± 0.4 µM, respectively | [ | |
| (−)-Stepholidine | Bark | Taiwan | Activity against MCF-7 (breast cancer) cell line with IC50 value of 16.56 µg/mL | [ | |
| Squamolone | Roots, stems, and leaves | Taiwan | Showed significant activity against Hep G2 and 2,2,15 cell lines with IC50 value of 2.8 and 1.6 µg/mL, respectively | [ |