| Literature DB >> 31803177 |
Emily S J Edwards1,2, Julian J Bosco2,3, Pei M Aui1,2, Robert G Stirling2,3, Paul U Cameron2,3, Josh Chatelier2,3, Fiona Hore-Lacy2,3, Robyn E O'Hehir1,2,3, Menno C van Zelm1,2,3.
Abstract
Background: Patients with predominantly antibody deficiency (PAD) suffer from severe and recurrent infections that require lifelong immunoglobulin replacement and prophylactic antibiotic treatment. Disease incidence is estimated to be 1:25,000 worldwide, and up to 68% of patients develop non-infectious complications (NIC) including autoimmunity, which are difficult to treat, causing high morbidity, and early mortality. Currently, the etiology of NIC is unknown, and there are no diagnostic and prognostic markers to identify patients at risk.Entities:
Keywords: CD21lo B cells; EuroFlow; X-linked agammaglobulinemia; autoimmunity; common variable immunodeficiency; follicular helper T cells; naive T cells; predominantly antibody deficiency
Year: 2019 PMID: 31803177 PMCID: PMC6873234 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.02593
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Immunol ISSN: 1664-3224 Impact factor: 7.561
Demographics, clinical details, and diagnostic results of the patients in this study.
| Median age (years; range) | |||||
| At inclusion | 30 (20–71) | 43 (18–82) | 46 (19–73) | 44 (23–82) | 24 (18–59) |
| At diagnosis | N/A | 35 | 45 (18–73) | 36 (12–74) | 9 |
| Female sex (%) | 33 (58%) | 34 (55%) | 14 (61%) | 20 (67%) | 0 |
| Clinical diagnosis | |||||
| Agammaglobulinemia (%) | 0 | 10 (16%) | 1 (4%) | 0 | 9 (100%) |
| CVID (%) | 0 | 32 (52%) | 9 (39%) | 23 (77%) | 0 |
| HGG (%) | 0 | 13 (21%) | 7 (30%) | 6 (20%) | 0 |
| IGSCD (%) | 0 | 1 (2%) | 1 (4%) | 0 | 0 |
| SpAD (%) | 0 | 6 (9%) | 5 (22%) | 1 (3%) | 0 |
| Decreased serum immunoglobulin levels | |||||
| IgG (%) | N/A | 40/54 (74%) | 14/23 (61%) | 26/30 (87%) | 0/1 |
| IgA (%) | N/A | 46/61 (75%) | 15/23 (65%) | 24/30 (80%) | 8/8 (100%) |
| IgM (%) | N/A | 34/61 (56%) | 11/23 (48%) | 15/30 (50%) | 8/8 (100%) |
| Impaired vaccination responses (%) | N/A | 25/30 (83%) | 12/16 (75%) | 12/14 (86%) | N/A |
| Reduced cell numbers | |||||
| B cells (%) | N/A | 24 (39%) | 3 (13%) | 12 (40%) | 9 (100%) |
| T cells (%) | N/A | 17 (27%) | 5 (22%) | 11 (37%) | 2 (22%) |
| IgRT at sampling (%) | N/A | 46 (74%) | 11 (48%) | 25 (83%) | 9 (100%) |
| IgRT started after inclusion (%) | N/A | 12 (19%) | 7 (30%) | 5 (17%) | N/A |
| Immunomodulators | N/A | 8 (13%) | 3 (13%) | 4 (13%) | 1 (11%) |
Reference ranges: IgG, 6.1–16.2 g/L; IgA, 0.85–4.99 g/L; IgM, 0.35–2.42 g/L; B cells, 97–614 cells/μl; T cells, 830–2,430 cells/μl.
(B- and T-cell reference ranges were derived from the 5th and 95th percentiles of our healthy controls).
Serum IgG levels and vaccination responses not assessed owing to historic nature of disease.
On immunomodulators within 6 months prior to blood sampling.
PAD, predominantly antibody deficiency; NIC, non-infectious complications; XLA, X-linked agammaglobulinemia; CVID, common variable immunodeficiency; HGG, hypogammaglobulinemia; IGSCD, IgG subclass deficiency; SpAD, specific polysaccharide antibody deficiency; IgRT, immunoglobulin replacement therapy; IGSCD, IgG subclass deficiency. A subset of patients has been reported in a recent publication (.
Complications in patients with predominantly antibody deficiency.
| URTI (%) | 49 (79%) | 17 (74%) | 24 (80%) | 8 (89%) |
| Sinusitis (%) | 48 (77%) | 16 (70%) | 24 (80%) | 8 (89%) |
| Otitis (%) | 20 (32%) | 7 (30%) | 7 (23%) | 6 (67%) |
| LRTI (%) | 49 (79%) | 17 (74%) | 25 (83%) | 8 (89%) |
| Bronchitis (%) | 8 (13%) | 4 (17%) | 4 (13%) | 0 |
| Pneumonia (%) | 38 (61%) | 12 (52%) | 20 (67%) | 7 (78%) |
| Bronchiectasis (%) | 17 (27%) | 4 (17%) | 8 (27%) | 5 (56%) |
| Gastrointestinal (%) | 4 (6%) | 0 | 4 (13%) | 0 |
| Giardia (%) | 4 (6%) | 0 | 4 (13%) | 0 |
| Other sites | 8 (13%) | 1 (4%) | 6 (20%) | 1 (11%) |
| GLILD (%) | 1 (2%) | 0 | 1 (3%) | 0 |
| Autoimmunity (total) (%) | 18 (29%) | 0 | 18 (60%) | 0 |
| Musculoskeletal (%) | 5 (8%) | 0 | 5 (17%) | 0 |
| Cytopenia (%) | 6 (10%) | 0 | 6 (20%) | 0 |
| Endocrine (%) | 3 (5%) | 0 | 3 (10%) | 0 |
| Splenomegaly (%) | 4 (6%) | 0 | 4 (13%) | 0 |
| Lymphadenopathy (%) | 1 (2%) | 0 | 1 (3%) | 0 |
| Gastrointestinal disease total) (%) | 11 (18%) | 0 | 11 (37%) | 0 |
| Enteropathy (%) | 10 (16%) | 0 | 10 (33%) | 0 |
| Colitis (%) | 2 (3%) | 0 | 2 (7%) | 0 |
| Granulomatous disease (%) | 3 (5%) | 0 | 3 (10%) | 0 |
| Malignancy (%) | 2 (3%) | 0 | 2 (7%) | 0 |
| Solid Organ (%) | 2 (3%) | 0 | 2 (7%) | 0 |
| Hematological (%) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
PAD, predominantly antibody deficiency; PAD–NIC, PAD without non-infectious complications; PAD+NIC, PAD with non-infectious complications; XLA, X-linked agammaglobulinemia; GLILD, granulomatous-lymphocytic interstitial lung disease.
Other includes osteomyelitis, pertussis, prostatitis, and systemic viral infection.
One XLA patient developed an acute precursor-B-cell leukemia 6 months after inclusion in this study (.
Classification of PAD patients according to the Freiburg and EUROclass definitions.
| Ia (smB−21lo) | 0 | 7 (13%) | 2 (9%) | 5 (16%) |
| Ib (smB−21norm) | 3 (5%) | 22 (42%) | 8 (36%) | 14 (47%) |
| II (smB+21lo or norm) | 56 (95%) | 24 (45%) | 13 (55%) | 11 (37%) |
| B– | 0 | 3 (6%) | 2 (9%) | 1 (3%) |
| B+smB−21normTrnorm | 0 | 5 (9%) | 3 (13%) | 2 (7%) |
| B+smB−21normTrhi | 0 | 1 (2%) | 0 | 1 (3%) |
| B+smB−21loTrnorm | 0 | 5 (9%) | 0 | 5 (17%) |
| B+smB−21loTrhi | 0 | 1 (2%) | 0 | 1 (3%) |
| B+smB+21norm | 59 (100%) | 31 (58%) | 15 (65%) | 16 (53%) |
| B+smB+21lo | 0 | 7 (14%) | 3 (13%) | 4 (14%) |
PAD, predominantly antibody deficiency; NIC, non-infectious complications; smBs, switched memory B cells, 21, CD21; Tr, transitional B cells.
Freiburg classification undertaken on patients with ≥1% B cells in lymphocyte gate; definitions (.
EUROclass definitions (.
Excluding patients with a clinical diagnosis of X-linked agammaglobulinemia (XLA), as these were all B cell negative.
Figure 1B-cell abnormalities in PAD patients. (A) Schematic overview of naive and memory B-cell subsets. (B) Absolute numbers of total B cells. Horizontal dotted lines represent the 5th and 95th percentiles of the healthy control group and were used as reference ranges. (C) Relative numbers and absolute numbers of B-cell subsets. (D) Absolute numbers of transitional, naive, natural effector, and IgG+ CD27+ memory B cells. For gating strategy and population definitions, see Supplementary Figure 2 and Supplementary Table 3. PAD, predominantly antibody deficiency; NIC, noninfectious complications. Statistics were performed with the Kruskal–Wallis test, followed by Mann–Whitney tests for pairwise comparisons. *p < 0.5, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, and ****p < 0.0001.
Figure 2Reduced naive T-cell numbers in PAD patients. (A) Absolute numbers of total T cells, γδ T cells, CD4 T cells, and CD8 T cells. Horizontal dotted lines represent the 5th and 95th percentiles as calculated in healthy controls. Relative and absolute numbers of (B) CD4 T-cell subsets and (C) CD8 T-cell subsets. Naive (Tn; CCR7CD45RO−), central memory (Tcm; CCR7CD45RO), effector memory (TemRO; CCR7−CD45RO−), and effector memory CD45RA revertant (TemRA; CCR7−CD45RO−). For gating strategy and population definitions, see Supplementary Figure 3 and Supplementary Table 3. PAD, predominantly antibody deficiency; NIC, non-infectious complications. Statistics were performed with the Kruskal–Wallis test, followed by Mann–Whitney tests for pairwise comparisons. *p < 0.5, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, and ****p < 0.0001.
Figure 3Correlation between naive B- and T-cell numbers in healthy controls and PAD patients. Correlation between absolute numbers of (A) naive CD4 and naive CD8 T cells, (B) naive B and naive CD4 T cells, and (C) naive B and naive CD8 T cells were assessed in healthy controls and PAD patients. Trend lines depict linear correlations for controls (top row; n = 59) and total group of non-XLA PAD patients (bottom row = 53). PAD, predominantly antibody deficiency; NIC, non-infectious complications; XLA, X-linked agammaglobulinemia. Statistics were performed using Spearman's rank correlation.
Figure 4Reduced Treg and helper T-cell numbers in PAD patients with non-infectious complications. (A) Total Treg, naive Treg, memory Treg, and CD4 Tfr cells. (B) Th17 and Th17.1 cells. (C) Total Tfh and Tfh17 cells. All numbers represent cells per microliter of blood. For gating strategy and population definitions, see Supplementary Figure 4 and Supplementary Table 3. PAD, predominantly antibody deficiency; NIC, non-infectious complications. Statistics were performed with the Kruskal–Wallis test, followed by Mann–Whitney tests for pairwise comparisons. *p < 0.5, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, and ****p < 0.0001.
Figure 5Pitfalls in interpretation of relative expansions of cell subsets in the context of reduced absolute total cell numbers. (A) Absolute numbers of total B cells. Horizontal dotted lines represent the 5th and 95th percentiles from the healthy controls. (B) Absolute numbers and relative frequencies of CD21lo B cells. Horizontal dotted lines denote the upper thresholds for CD21lo expansions in the Freiburg (red) and EUROclass (blue) classification schemes. (C) Absolute numbers of total CD4 T cells. (D) Absolute numbers and relative frequencies of Tfh cells. For gating strategies, see Supplementary Figure 2 (CD21lo B cells) and Supplementary Figure 4 (Tfh cells). PAD, predominantly antibody deficiency; NIC, non-infectious complications. Statistics were performed with the Kruskal–Wallis test, followed by Mann–Whitney tests for pairwise comparisons. *p < 0.5, **p < 0.01, and ****p < 0.0001.