| Literature DB >> 32355559 |
Christina Grosserichter-Wagener1, Alexander Franco-Gallego2, Fatemeh Ahmadi1, Marcela Moncada-Vélez2, Virgil Ash Dalm1,3, Jessica Lineth Rojas2, Julio César Orrego2, Natalia Correa Vargas2, Lennart Hammarström4, Marco Wj Schreurs1, Willem A Dik1, P Martin van Hagen1,3, Louis Boon5, Jacques Jm van Dongen1,6, Mirjam van der Burg1,7, Qiang Pan-Hammarström4, José L Franco2, Menno C van Zelm1,8,9.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Selective IgA deficiency (sIgAD) is the most common primary immunodeficiency in Western countries. Patients can suffer from recurrent infections and autoimmune diseases because of a largely unknown aetiology. To increase insights into the pathophysiology of the disease, we studied memory B and T cells and cytokine concentrations in peripheral blood.Entities:
Keywords: B‐cell memory; IgA; Th1 cells; Th17 cells; cytokine concentration; selective IgA deficiency
Year: 2020 PMID: 32355559 PMCID: PMC7190975 DOI: 10.1002/cti2.1130
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Transl Immunology ISSN: 2050-0068
Figure 1Reductions in CD27+ and CD27− IgA+ memory B cells in sIgAD patients. (a) Schematics of TI and TD IgA responses. (b) Quantification of CD27− and CD27+ IgA+ memory B cells. Adult controls n = 29, sIgAD patients n = 14; paediatric controls n = 67, sIgAD patients n = 10. (c) Quantification of B‐cell subsets in children and (d) adults. The number of patients are indicated in the upper right corner for B‐cell subsets, except for IgG+ memory B cells (n = 11). b–d, red lines indicate median values. Statistics were calculated with the Mann–Whitney U‐test; ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001. Technical replicates were not performed. Numbers depict biological replicates.
Figure 2Molecular maturation of IgA transcripts in sIgAD patients. (a) Schematic overview of the human IGH locus depicting the positioning of IgA and IgG encoding regions. (b) Distribution of IgA subclasses in children and adults; analysed sequences are indicated with small circles. (c) Mutations in IGA transcripts (median with interquartile range). Number of sequences analysed shown in parentheses. (d) Antigenic selection of IGA transcripts of controls (n = 477) and sIgAD patients (n = 168). (a–d) Healthy controls: children n = 6, adults n = 6. sIgAD patients: children n = 6, adults n = 9. Statistics were calculated with the Mann–Whitney U‐test; ****P < 0.0001. Technical replicates were not performed. Numbers depict biological replicates.
Figure 3Normal B‐cell activation in adult sIgAD patients. (a) Overlays of activation marker expression after 48‐h stimulation of naive B cells from a healthy control. (b) MFI (median fluorescent intensity) of activation makers measured 48 h after in vitro stimulation of naive B cells from sIgAD adults (n = 3; patients 14, 22 and 25) and adult controls (n = 3). Technical replicates were not performed. Each experiment was performed on three biological samples per group.
Figure 4Reduced Th1 and Th17 cell numbers and increased cytokine concentrations. (a) Gating strategy of CD4+ T cells to define Th1 (CD45RA−CCR6−CXCR3+CCR4−), Th2 (CD45RA−CCR6−CXCR3−CCR4+), Th17 (CD45RA−CCR6+CXCR3−CCR4+), regulatory T cells (Treg; CD25+CD127−) and follicular helper T cells (Tfh; CD45RO+CXCR5+). (b) Quantification of T‐helper cells in adult sIgAD patients and controls. (c) Cytokine concentrations in blood samples (dots represent plasma samples; triangles represent serum samples) of adult sIgAD patients and controls. (b, c) Red lines depict median values; statistics were calculated with the Mann–Whitney U‐test; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001. Technical replicates were not performed. Numbers depict biological replicates.