| Literature DB >> 31799293 |
Hussein Sabit1, Emre Cevik2, Huseyin Tombuloglu2.
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer in men (746000 cases per year) and the second most common cancer in women globally (614000 cases per year). The incidence rate of CRC in developed countries (737000 cases per year) is higher than that in less developed countries (624000 cases per year). CRC can arise from genetic causes such as chromosomal instability and microsatellite instability. Several etiologic factors underlie CRC including age, diet, and lifestyle. Gut microbiota represent a proven cause of the disease, where they play pivotal roles in modulating and reshaping the host epigenome. Several active microbial metabolites have been found to drive carcinogenesis, invasion, and metastasis via modifying both the methylation landscape along with histone structure in intestinal cells. Gut microbiota, in response to diet, can exert both beneficial and harmful functions in humans, according to the intestinal balance of number and types of these bacteria. Although the intestinal microbial community is diverse among individuals, these microbes cumulatively produce 100-fold more proteins than the human genome itself, which calls for further studies to elaborate on the complicated interaction between these microorganisms and intestinal cells. Therefore, understanding the exact role that gut microbiota play in inducing CRC will help attain reliable strategies to precisely diagnose and treat this fatal disease. ©The Author(s) 2019. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.Entities:
Keywords: Cancer; Colorectal; Colorectal cancer; Epigenetics; Gut; Microbiota
Year: 2019 PMID: 31799293 PMCID: PMC6887622 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v7.i22.3683
Source DB: PubMed Journal: World J Clin Cases ISSN: 2307-8960 Impact factor: 1.337
Figure 1The way gut microbiota induces CRC. Several factors affecting the normal behavior of microbiota such as low fiber and high-fat diets. This change might affect the number/types of gut bacteria or cause them to express different kinds of proteins and metabolites. A category of these metabolites could be oncogenic (oncometabolites) and trigger inflammation in gut epithelial cells leading to cancer initiation. Bacterial metabolites also could enhance cancer spreading and metastasis. CRC: Colorectal cancer.
Figure 2Different pathways through which CRC develops. CRC: Colorectal cancer.
Gut microbiota are involved in CRC carcinogenesis
| Immunomodulatory effect | [ | |
| Production of colibactin that induces CRC | [ | |
| Activation of β-catenin signaling and induction of oncogenic gene expression that promotes growth of CRC cells | [ | |
| Production of butyrate to induce IL-10, the anti-inflammatory cytokine | [ | |
| Production of Enterotoxigenic | [ | |
| Triggering of inflammations, bacteremia, and endocarditis, that leads ultimately to colorectal cancer | [ | |
| Production of alpha toxin that binds GPI-anchored cell surface receptors including the human folate receptor as well as the neuronal molecules contactin and Thy-1 (CD90) | [ | |
| Damaging the colonic epithelial cell DNA | [ | |
| Production of β-galactosidases, which has antitumor activity | [ | |
| Induction of inflammatory responses, alteration of gut microflora and release of gastrin, which may contribute to tumor formation | [ | |
| Production of butyrate to induce IL-10, the anti-inflammatory cytokine that protects against cancer formation | [ | |
| Induction of early-stage carcinogenic, that might lead to early colorectal carcinogenesis | [ | |
| Contribution to the anticancer effect of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. It improves also malnutrition in infants | [ | |
| Activate the E-cadherin/β-catenin signaling pathway and association with epigenetic phenotype, such as microsatellite instability and hypermethylation, | [ | |
| Causes colon actinomycosis only when the epithelial barrier was perished | [ | |
| Might be able to enhance the dosage response to CRC chemotherapeutic agents or reduce the side effects of these drugs | [ |
CRC: Colorectal cancer; ETBF: Enterotoxigenic Bacteroides fragilis.
Figure 3Different functions of butyrate in protecting against CRC. CRC: Colorectal cancer; HDAC: Histone deacetylase.
Figure 4Different gut microbiota generate different oncometabolites. Bacteroides expresses specific signaling substances to activate toll-like receptor 2 (TLR 2), which functions in two different ways; activation of FOX3 to trigger Treg activation leading to inflammation. The other way is the activation of T helper 17 cells that also triggers inflammation. Flagellin, a product of flagellated bacteria, activates also TLR 5 to activate innate lymphoid cells 3 and then IL 17 and 22 that initiate inflammation. TLR 5 also works on nuclear factor κB to activate miR-21 that has a role in initiating cancer carcinogenesis (CRC). Meanwhile, Fusobacteria can stimulate a specific type of TLR that activates nuclear factor of activated T cell via calmodulin-based calcineurin to initiate CRC. CRC: Colorectal cancer; IL: Interleukin; ILC: lymphoid cells; NF-κB: Nuclear factor-κB; NFAT: Nuclear factor of activated T cell; TLR: Toll-like receptor; Treg: T regulatory cell.
A list of representative miRNAs identified in tumor tissues that are of prognostic value in CRC patients
| miR-15a/miR-16 | Their low expression levels were associated with poor disease-free survival and overall survival | [ |
| miR-17-5p | Its high expression was associated with disease-free survival | [ |
| miR-21 | Its high level of expression was associated with poor survival and poor therapeutic outcomes | [ |
| miR-29a | Its elevated level of expression was associated with a longer disease-free survival in stage II CRC patients | [ |
| miR-34a-5p | Its high expression was correlated with disease-free survival | [ |
| miR-106a | Its downregulation was associated with shortened overall survival | [ |
| miR-132 | Its decreased expression level was associated with poorer overall survival and occurrence of distant metastasis especially in liver | [ |
| miR-150 | Its elevated expression level was associated with longer overall survival. While its low level of expression was associated with poor therapeutic outcome in patients treated with 5-Fluro uracil | [ |
| miR-195 | Its low expression rate was associated with occurrence of lymph node metastasis and advanced tumor grade/stage | [ |
| miR-199b | Increased in metastatic CRC tissue compared with non-metastatic CRC tissue. Furthermore, its low expression was associated with longer overall survival | [ |
| miR-203 | Its elevated expression level was associated with advanced TNM staging and poorer overall survival | [ |
| miR-320e | Its high expression was associated with poorer overall survival in stage III colon cancer patients | [ |
| miR-429 | Its overexpression was associated with overall survival; low level of expression was associated with response to 5-Fluro uracil-based chemotherapy | [ |
| miR-494 | Its elevated expression was associated with shorter DFS and overall survival | [ |
| miR-625-3p | High expressions were associated with higher overall survival and enhanced response to therapy | [ |
CRC: Colorectal cancer.