Literature DB >> 29670137

A systems biology approach to predict and characterize human gut microbial metabolites in colorectal cancer.

QuanQiu Wang1, Li Li2, Rong Xu3.   

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths. It is estimated that about half the cases of CRC occurring today are preventable. Recent studies showed that human gut microbiota and their collective metabolic outputs play important roles in CRC. However, the mechanisms by which human gut microbial metabolites interact with host genetics in contributing CRC remain largely unknown. We hypothesize that computational approaches that integrate and analyze vast amounts of publicly available biomedical data have great potential in better understanding how human gut microbial metabolites are mechanistically involved in CRC. Leveraging vast amount of publicly available data, we developed a computational algorithm to predict human gut microbial metabolites for CRC. We validated the prediction algorithm by showing that previously known CRC-associated gut microbial metabolites ranked highly (mean ranking: top 10.52%; median ranking: 6.29%; p-value: 3.85E-16). Moreover, we identified new gut microbial metabolites likely associated with CRC. Through computational analysis, we propose potential roles for tartaric acid, the top one ranked metabolite, in CRC etiology. In summary, our data-driven computation-based study generated a large amount of associations that could serve as a starting point for further experiments to refute or validate these microbial metabolite associations in CRC cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29670137      PMCID: PMC5906656          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-24315-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


Introduction

Colorectal cancers are the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths in in the United States and the third most common cancer in men and in women[1]. In the United States alone, an estimated 135,430 men and women will be diagnosed with CRC in the year 2017 and 50,260 will die from this disease[2]. It is estimated that forty-five percent of CRC are preventable by modifiable environmental factors such as food, nutrition, lifestyle, and physical activity, among others[3,4]. Human gut microbiota, the collection of microorganisms that live in the human digestive tracts, play central roles in human health and diseases, by metabolizing nutrients and food components and by controlling the immune response of the human body[5-8]. Growing evidence suggests that gut microbiota and their metabolites not only influence carcinogenesis and tumor progression, but also influence the efficacy of anticancer therapies[9-11]. Human microbiome (the collective genomes of the microbiota) studies have revealed that gut dysbiosis (an imbalance in the intestinal bacteria) is associated with the increased incidence of CRC[11-14]. Undigested dietary components that reach the large intestine are fermented by microbiota to produce a variety of metabolites and nutrients. It has become increasingly clear that the collective metabolic outputs of gut microbiota strongly influence cancer susceptibility and progression[5,15,16]. For example, recent studies have shown that the short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) butyrate, one of the most abundant metabolites of gut microbiota in the fermentation of fiber, has a role in the suppression of inflammation and colorectal cancer[17]. Currently, the mechanisms by which gut microbial metabolites interact with host genetics in promoting or protecting against CRC remain unknown. Computational approaches have been widely used in drug development[18-24] and disease mechanism understanding[25-27]. We have recently developed a hypothesis-driven systems approach to understand how trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO), a gut microbial metabolite of dietary meat and fat, is mechanistically involved in CRC[28]. Here, we present a data-driven computational approach to estimate which microbial metabolites might affect CRC. The identification of human gut microbial metabolites and the understanding of their role as key mediators through which bacteria might promote or protect against CRC is important. Taken together, characterizing these microbial metabolites will likely enhance our understanding of the complex gene-environment interactions in carcinogenesis, and add up to new possibilities for CRC diagnosis, prevention, and treatment.

Data and Methods

Data

We used large amounts of publicly available data, including human metabolome, disease genetics, chemical genetics, signaling pathways, and mouse genome-wide mutation phenotypes for both the prediction and functional characterization of gut microbial metabolites for CRC (Fig. 1).
Figure 1

Datasets used in this study.

Datasets used in this study.

Data resources of CRC-associated genes

We used three complementary disease genetics resources to obtain CRC-associated genes. We obtained (1) 32 CRC-associated genes from the Catalog of Published Genome-Wide Association Studies (GWAS), a comprehensive collection of all published GWAS studies[29]; (2) 38 CRC-associated genes from the Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM), a comprehensive collection of human genes and genetic phenotypes for Mendelian disorders[30]; and (3) 31 genes that are significantly mutated in colorectal cancer patients from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), a comprehensive cancer database and contains genetic and clinical data for 283 colorectal patients[31]. We used these three complementary and independent disease genetics resources to demonstrate the robustness of the algorithms and our findings.

The Human Metabolome Database (HMDB)

HMDB is a comprehensive database of small molecule metabolites found in the human body[32]. Currently, HMDB contains 52,658 metabolites, including 172 metabolites originated in human gut microbiota.

Data resource of metabolite-associated genes

We obtained metabolite/chemical-associated genes from STITCH (Search Tool for Interactions of Chemicals). STITCH contains chemical-gene association data for > 300,000 small molecules and 2.6 million proteins from 1,133 organisms[33]. We used chemical-gene associations found in human body, which include 1,466,636 chemical-gene pairs, 259,171 chemicals, and 15,620 human genes.

Genetic pathway data

We used gene-pathway association data from the Molecular Signatures Database (MSigDB) to construct molecular profiles for CRC and metabolites and to study the interplaying pathways underlying top identified microbial metabolites and CRC. MSigDB contains 10,295 annotated pathways and gene sets[34].

Genome-wide mutational phenotypes in experimental mouse models

Recently, the Mouse Genome Database (MGD) has made available large amounts of phenotypic descriptions of systematic gene knockouts in mouse models[35]. We have recently shown that these strong causal gene-phenotype annotations (278,553 gene-phenotype associations for 41,905 mutant alleles and 10,744 phenotypes) have great potential for virtual phenotypic screening for drug discovery[21-23]. In this study, we used gene-phenotype associations from MGD to assess the functional effects of top ranked microbial metabolites on CRC-related phenotypes.

Metabolome-wide prediction of gut microbial metabolites for CRC

The experimental flowchart is summarized in Fig. 2 and described in details in subsequent sections.
Figure 2

Rank metabolites for CRC based on profile similarities.

Rank metabolites for CRC based on profile similarities.

Construct molecular profiles for diseases

We identified CRC-associated genes from the three disease genetics databases: the GWAS catalog, OMIM, and TCGA. Pathways associated with each gene were obtained from MSigDB. For each pathway, we assessed its probability of being associated with the given set of CRC-associated genes as compared to its probability associated with the same number of randomly selected genes. The random process is repeated 1000 times and a t-test was used to assess the statistical significance. As an example, the pathway “colorectal cancer” is associated with 7 out of 31 (29.0%) CRC genes from TCGA, which represents a significant 39-fold enrichment as compared to the random expectation of 0.7%. The molecular profile for CRC consists of a list of significantly enriched pathways. Three molecular profiles were built for CRC using genes from three complementary disease genetics resources.

Build molecular profiles for chemicals/metabolites

Similarly, we built one molecular profile for each of the 259,170 chemicals/metabolites from the STITCH database. For example, the molecular profile for butyric acid, a human gut microbial metabolite, consists of 609 pathways.

Prioritize metabolites for CRC

Metabolites were prioritized based on how their molecular profiles are similar to CRC-specific molecular profile. We implemented three commonly used set similarity measures: overlap, Jaccard coefficient, and cosine similarity[36]. Overlap is defined as the intersection of disease profile set and metabolite profile set. Jaccard coefficient of two sets is defined as the size of the intersection divided by the size of the union. The cosine similarity is defined as the Euclidean dot product of two sets. The output is a ranked list of 259,170 chemicals/metabolites for CRC prioritized based on their profile similarities with CRC.

Evaluation using known CRC-associated metabolites

We evaluated the prioritization algorithm using 32 known CRC-associated metabolites extracted from a recent review paper[15]. Recall, mean and median rankings were used for performance measures. Significance was calculated by comparing actual rankings to random expectation (based on random expectation, a metabolite shall have an average ranking of 50%). We also examined the number of known metabolites at 10 decile rankings. A good prioritization algorithm shall enrich true positives among top-ranked entities. We calculated the number of known metabolites at each decile and plotted decile enrichment distribution.

Evaluate the rankings of all human microbial metabolites for CRC

We investigated whether human gut microbial metabolites in general are highly related to CRC in terms of molecular relevance. We examined the rankings of all 172 microbial metabolites among prioritized chemicals. Recall, mean and median rankings were calculated and decile ranking was plotted.

Functional characterization of top ranked novel microbial metabolite in CRC

Identify common pathways between novel metabolite and CRC

We identified common genetic pathways that are significantly enriched for the novel metabolite and CRC. We then developed an algorithm to further prioritize these common pathways. The ranking of each common pathway is a balance measure of rankings from the disease (CRC) and from the metabolite. A pathway ranks highly if and only if it ranks highly for both the metabolite and the disease. The ranking of a common pathway is defined as: ranking_combined = 2*(ranking_d * ranking_m)/(ranking_d + ranking_m), where ranking_d is the ranking score of a pathway for CRC; and ranking_m is the ranking score of the same pathway for the metabolite.

Functional characterization of phenotypic effects of the novel metabolite on CRC

We obtained metabolite-associated genes from STITCH and then mapped genes to their corresponding mouse gene homologs (e.g., SMAD4 =  > 18Wsu70e) using human-mouse homolog mapping data from MGD[35]. The mapped mouse genes were then linked to their corresponding mutational phenotypes in mouse models (e.g., SMAD4 =  > increased intestinal adenoma incidence, TP53 =  > colon polyps) using gene-phenotype association data from MGD. For each mapped phenotype, we assessed its probability of being associated with the given set of metabolite-associated genes as compared to its probability associated with the same number of randomly selected genes. The random process is repeated 1000 times and a t-test was used to assess the statistical significance. Similarly, we built a CRC-specific phenotype profile using data from disease genetics databases. CRC- and metabolite-specific phenotype profiles were intersected. Shared phenotypes were prioritized as described for prioritizing shared pathways between the metabolite and CRC. A phenotype (e.g., colon polyps) ranked highly if and only if it ranks high for both CRC and the novel metabolite.

Data availability

http://nlp.case.edu/public/data/CRC_Microbiome/.

Results

Known CRC-associated microbial metabolites ranked highly

The algorithm found 26 of 32 known metabolites (recall: 0.813) and the recall is determined by the coverage of the STITCH database. The not-perfect recall indicates that although STITCH is currently the most comprehensive chemical genetics database of 1,466,636 chemical-gene pairs for 259,171 chemicals/metabolites, the coverage for gut microbial metabolites is not perfect. Known CRC metabolites ranked significantly high as compared to random expectation (Table 1). As an example, when CRC-associated genes from the GWAS catalog were used to build disease-specific molecular profile, known CRC-associated microbial metabolites on average ranked at top 10.52% among 259,170 chemicals/metabolites, which is significantly higher than random expectation (P-value: 3.85E-6). These findings are consistent when CRC-associated genes from three complementary disease genetics data resources were used (Table 1).
Table 1

Known CRC-associated microbial metabolites were ranked highly among 259,170 chemicals/metabolites when three complementary disease genetics databases (The GWAS Catalog, OMIM and TCGA) were used for obtaining CRC-associated genes.

Disease GeneticsRecallMean Ranking (top %)Median ranking (top %)P-value
GWAS0.81310.52%6.29%3.85E-16
OMIM0.81312.67%9.51%1.62E-14
TCGA0.81312.21%11.60%9.38E-15
Known CRC-associated microbial metabolites were ranked highly among 259,170 chemicals/metabolites when three complementary disease genetics databases (The GWAS Catalog, OMIM and TCGA) were used for obtaining CRC-associated genes. The decile rankings further demonstrate that the ranking algorithm effectively enriched known CRC-associated metabolites at top. For example, 14 of 26 known metabolites are ranked at the first decile (top 10%) (Fig. 3).
Figure 3

The decile ranking of known CRC-associated metabolites among 259,170 chemicals/metabolites. Three complementary disease genetics databases (The GWAS Catalog, OMIM and TCGA) were used for obtaining CRC-associated genes.

The decile ranking of known CRC-associated metabolites among 259,170 chemicals/metabolites. Three complementary disease genetics databases (The GWAS Catalog, OMIM and TCGA) were used for obtaining CRC-associated genes. We then examined which categories of microbial metabolites ranked highly for CRC. We classified known metabolites into six categories[15]. Short chain fatty acids (SCFAs) are known to be involved in colon health[15,17]. Our study indeed shows that SCFAs ranked highest (top 3.86%) among all known CRC-associated metabolites. The results are consistent when three independent disease genetics databases were used to obtain CRC-associated genes (Table 2).
Table 2 

Stratified rankings of known CRC-associated microbial metabolites among 259,170 prioritized chemicals/metabolites. Three complementary disease genetics databases (The GWAS Catalog, OMIM and TCGA) were used for obtaining CRC-associated genes.

MetaboliteDisease GeneticsRecallMean Ranking (top %)Median ranking (top %)P-value
SCFAsGWAS1.003.86%4.65%3.07E-6
OMIM1.005.67%5.53%1.62E-5
TCGA1.006.84%5.53%5.29E-5
Bile acidsGWAS0.787.06%1.56%1.60E-5
OMIM0.786.34%2.91%3.67E-6
TCGA0.786.20%3.10%3.22E-6
IndolesGWAS0.609.51%8.76%0.005
OMIM0.6010.98%11.24%0.011
TCGA0.6010.21%13.05%0.005
CresolsGWAS0.7511.11%10.51%0.003
OMIM0.7516.29%14.04%0.006
TCGA0.7514.93%14.50%0.002
Phenolic acidsGWAS0.8018.34%20.42%0.010
OMIM0.8020.43%21.16%0.019
TCGA0.8020.77%17.93%0.027
PolyaminesGWAS1.0023.12%28.46%0.149
OMIM1.0031.03%38.81%0.328
TCGA1.0027.11%34.39%0.204
Stratified rankings of known CRC-associated microbial metabolites among 259,170 prioritized chemicals/metabolites. Three complementary disease genetics databases (The GWAS Catalog, OMIM and TCGA) were used for obtaining CRC-associated genes.

Human gut microbial metabolites in general ranked highly for CRC

Microbial metabolites in general are highly associated with CRC based on molecular convergence. The algorithm found 131 of 172 (recall: 0.761) metabolites originated in gut microbiota (as determined by HMDB database)[32]. These 131 microbial metabolites ranked consistently highly when CRC-associated genes from three complementary databases were used (Table 3). As an example, microbial metabolites on average ranked at top 14.43% (P-value: 2.27E-57) among 259,170 prioritized chemicals/metabolites.
Table 3 

Rankings of gut microbial metabolites among 259,170 prioritized chemicals/metabolites.

Disease GeneticsRecallMean Ranking (top %)Median ranking (top %)P-value
GWAS0.76114.43%10.11%2.27E-57
OMIM0.76116.88%12.13%2.77E-46
TCGA0.76118.84%12.47%2.47E-37
Rankings of gut microbial metabolites among 259,170 prioritized chemicals/metabolites. The decile rankings show that the majority of gut microbial metabolites were ranked at first decile (top 10%) (Fig. 4). For example, when CRC-associated genes from the GWAS catalog were used to build disease-specific molecular profile, 64 of 131 gut microbial metabolites were ranked at the first decile.
Figure 4

The decile ranking of all human gut microbial metabolites among 259,170 chemicals/metabolites. Three complementary disease genetics databases (The GWAS Catalog, OMIM and TCGA) were used for obtaining CRC-associated genes.

The decile ranking of all human gut microbial metabolites among 259,170 chemicals/metabolites. Three complementary disease genetics databases (The GWAS Catalog, OMIM and TCGA) were used for obtaining CRC-associated genes. The top 20 ranked microbial metabolites are shown in Table 4. Seven of these top 20 metabolites are known CRC-associated metabolites. Tartaric acid ranked at top 3, immediately following butyric acid, a well-known microbial metabolite associated with CRC and colon health. Trimethylamine n-oxide (TMAO) also ranked highly (top 13). Previous studies showed that TMAO is both mechanistically and clinically associated with increased risk of CRC[28,37].
Table 4

Top 20 ranked microbial metabolites for CRC. Seven known CRC-related microbial metabolites are highlighted in green.

RankMetaboliteRankMetabolite
1Taurochenodesoxycholic acid11Isopropyl alcohol
2Butyric acid12D-alanine
3Tartaric acid13Trimethylamine n-oxide
4Acetaldehyde14Taurodeoxycholic acid
5Mannitol15Deoxycholic acid glycine conjugate
6P-aminobenzoic acid16Acetone
7Trans-ferulic acid17Zeaxanthin
8Putrescine183,4-dihydroxybenzeneacetic acid
9Chenodeoxycholic acid glycine conjugate91-butanol
10D-glutamic acid20Phenylethylamine
Top 20 ranked microbial metabolites for CRC. Seven known CRC-related microbial metabolites are highlighted in green.

Tartaric acid may be both genetically and functionally involved in CRC

Tartaric acid is the top one ranked microbial metabolite that is not included in the list of 32 known CRC-associated metabolites. Tartaric acid is a phytochemical found abundantly in nuts, apricots, apples, sunflower, avocado, grapes, among others[38]. Tartaric acid is associated with 305 genes (based on the STITCH database). These genes are significantly associated with 611 pathways, demonstrating that tartaric acid may participate in many biological functions. Many of the top ranked pathways are related to immune functions, including Cytokines and Inflammatory Response, IL12-mediated signaling events, and Downstream signaling in naïve CD8 + T cells. Among 117 pathways significantly associated for CRC, 64 (54.7%) pathways are also associated with tartaric acid, demonstrating that tartaric acid may be mechanistically involved in CRC etiology. The top 20 pathways shared by both CRC and tartaric acid are shown in Table 5. Many of these top common pathways are directly involved in CRC, including Regulation of nuclear SMAD2/3 signaling, β-catenin pathway, WNT pathway, TGF-beta signaling pathway, and Colorectal cancer.
Table 5 

Top 20 pathways significantly associated with both CRC and tartaric acid.

RankCommon PathwayRankCommon Pathway
1Regulation of nuclear SMAD2/3 signaling11Validated targets of C-MYC transcriptional activation
2Integrin cell surface interactions12Regulation of retinoblastoma protein
3ECM-receptor interaction13BMP receptor signaling
4Small cell lung cancer14Prostate cancer
5Beta-catenin pathway15Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC)
6Progesterone-mediated oocyte maturation16Wnt-mediated signal transduction
7Signaling by SCF-KIT17Colorectal cancer
8Beta1 integrin cell surface interactions18ErbB4 signaling events
9AP-1 transcription factor network19Internalization of ErbB1
10TGF-beta signaling pathway20Beta3 integrin cell surface interactions
Top 20 pathways significantly associated with both CRC and tartaric acid. To estimate the possible effects of tartaric acid on CRC, we identified mouse mutational phenotypes that are significantly associated with both CRC and tartaric acid. A total of 2441 mouse mutational phenotypes are significantly associated with tartaric acid, and 600 phenotypes are significantly associated with CRC. Among the 600 CRC-associated phenotypes, 267 (45%) phenotypes are also associated with tartaric acid. The top 20 shared phenotypes are shown in Table 6. Both top 1 and 2 ranked phenotypes are directly related to digestive system.
Table 6

Top 20 phenotypes significantly associated with both CRC and tartaric acid. CRC-specific phenotypes are highlighted (yellow).

RankCommon PhenotypeRankCommon Phenotype
1Abnormal intestinal goblet cell morphology11Kidney failure
2Abnormal intestinal epithelium morphology12Increased osteoclast cell number
3Abnormal forelimb morphology13Abnormal metastatic potential
4Abnormal osteoclast physiology14Abnormal renal tubule morphology
5Albuminuria15Abnormal head morphology
6Abnormal facial morphology16Increased bone mineral density
7Abnormal lymphopoiesis17Abnormal vascular wound healing
8Glomerulosclerosis18Increased lymphocyte cell number
9Decreased susceptibility to injury19Abnormal pancreatic islet morphology
10Increased circulating creatinine level20Abnormal hindlimb morphology
Top 20 phenotypes significantly associated with both CRC and tartaric acid. CRC-specific phenotypes are highlighted (yellow).

Discussion

More than half the cases of cancer, including CRC, occurring today are preventable and about one-third of the cases can be attributed to modifiable environmental factors such as food, nutrition, lifestyle, and physical activity, among others[4]. The susceptibility, initiation, and progression of CRC and many other cancers is primarily driven by gene–environment interactions. Human gut microbiota are important modifiable environmental factors that are part of the ecosystem of our bodies. Functional studies in germ-free mouse models of cancer have demonstrated that microbiota can affect cancer susceptibility and progression in various organs, including colon, however, the mechanisms by which gut microbial metabolites are involved in cancer remain unknown. In this study, we presented a data-driven systems approach to identify and estimate gut microbial metabolites playing a role in CRC. Our approach is a data-driven computational estimation, which can be applied to different traits and diseases. In this study, we focused on CRC because of the vast availability of known CRC-associated gut microbial metabolites. Our data-driven computational method to estimate associations can take a disease name or a list of disease-associated genes as input, and the output will be a ranked list of microbial metabolites (along with shared molecular signatures and functional phenotypes) for the input disease. For clarity, this ‘in silico’ study is not functional microbiome study. Instead, it largely complements existing microbiome studies by identifying microbial metabolites within vast amounts of existing database information of diseases, genes, pathways, functional phenotypes, and metabolome. However, our study holds several limitations that warrant further discussion. First, the relationships among microbes, their metabolites, and hosts are complex, non-linear and bi-directional[39]. For example, recent studies showed that gut microbial metabolites are involved in CRC etiology by altering host epigenome[37]. Our study focused on the database-dependent interactions between microbial metabolites and CRC genetics of the host. Indeed, we lack the necessary data in order to computationally model the effects of metabolites on microbe populations, the host genetics on microbe variations or epigenetic effects on host genomes. The goal of this study was to provide estimates of associations between human gut microbial metabolites and CRC, which in turn may inform the identification of responsible microbe composition in cancer etiology. Second, host genetics can affect gut microbiota composition and metabolic outputs in response to environmental factors[40,41]. A person’s genetic make-up can influence his/her response to environmental stressors, gut microbiota population, and microbiome-genome interactions. As personal genetic and genomics information becomes increasingly available, a patient-focused understanding of environment-microbiome-genome-cancer interactions is possible by linking personal genome to metabolite-gene-pathway-disease connections as identified in this study. Third, among the 41,806 small molecule metabolites available in HMDB, only 172 metabolites (~0.4%) originate in gut microbiota. The field of microbiome research is a fast-moving target with an increasing number of microbial metabolites being identified. The computational algorithms we developed have built-in flexibility and capability to incorporate new data as it becomes available. Lastly, our current study is pure ‘in-silico’. Our goal was to generate estimates of associations data/hypotheses that may be tested to refute or validate our suggestions of gut microbial metabolites role in CRC. We anticipate that both the data-driven computational methods developed and the associations generated in this study will likely stimulate further studies of microbiome-gene interactions in cancer etiology. Taken together, validating identified metabolite-CRC associations in animal models or humans are needed in order to translate the findings into cancer diagnosis, prevention, and treatment.
  36 in total

Review 1.  Host-gut microbiota metabolic interactions.

Authors:  Jeremy K Nicholson; Elaine Holmes; James Kinross; Remy Burcelin; Glenn Gibson; Wei Jia; Sven Pettersson
Journal:  Science       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Individuality in gut microbiota composition is a complex polygenic trait shaped by multiple environmental and host genetic factors.

Authors:  Andrew K Benson; Scott A Kelly; Ryan Legge; Fangrui Ma; Soo Jen Low; Jaehyoung Kim; Min Zhang; Phaik Lyn Oh; Derrick Nehrenberg; Kunjie Hua; Stephen D Kachman; Etsuko N Moriyama; Jens Walter; Daniel A Peterson; Daniel Pomp
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-10-11       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  A survey of current trends in computational drug repositioning.

Authors:  Jiao Li; Si Zheng; Bin Chen; Atul J Butte; S Joshua Swamidass; Zhiyong Lu
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 11.622

4.  Interactions between Gut Microbiota, Host Genetics and Diet Modulate the Predisposition to Obesity and Metabolic Syndrome.

Authors:  Siegfried Ussar; Nicholas W Griffin; Olivier Bezy; Shiho Fujisaka; Sara Vienberg; Samir Softic; Luxue Deng; Lynn Bry; Jeffrey I Gordon; C Ronald Kahn
Journal:  Cell Metab       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 27.287

Review 5.  The gut microbiota, bacterial metabolites and colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Petra Louis; Georgina L Hold; Harry J Flint
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2014-09-08       Impact factor: 60.633

Review 6.  Applying what we know to accelerate cancer prevention.

Authors:  Graham A Colditz; Kathleen Y Wolin; Sarah Gehlert
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 17.956

7.  Phenome-driven disease genetics prediction toward drug discovery.

Authors:  Yang Chen; Li Li; Guo-Qiang Zhang; Rong Xu
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2015-06-15       Impact factor: 6.937

8.  Precision microbiome reconstitution restores bile acid mediated resistance to Clostridium difficile.

Authors:  Charlie G Buffie; Vanni Bucci; Richard R Stein; Peter T McKenney; Lilan Ling; Asia Gobourne; Daniel No; Hui Liu; Melissa Kinnebrew; Agnes Viale; Eric Littmann; Marcel R M van den Brink; Robert R Jenq; Ying Taur; Chris Sander; Justin R Cross; Nora C Toussaint; Joao B Xavier; Eric G Pamer
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-10-22       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  The Mouse Genome Database (MGD): facilitating mouse as a model for human biology and disease.

Authors:  Janan T Eppig; Judith A Blake; Carol J Bult; James A Kadin; Joel E Richardson
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2014-10-27       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  A genomics-based systems approach towards drug repositioning for rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Rong Xu; QuanQiu Wang
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2016-08-22       Impact factor: 3.969

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Viewing Bacterial Colonization through the Lens of Systems Biology.

Authors:  Madeline R Barron; Vincent B Young
Journal:  mSystems       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 7.324

2.  CoMNRank: An integrated approach to extract and prioritize human microbial metabolites from MEDLINE records.

Authors:  QuanQiu Wang; Rong Xu
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2020-08-11       Impact factor: 6.317

3.  Drug repurposing for opioid use disorders: integration of computational prediction, clinical corroboration, and mechanism of action analyses.

Authors:  Mengshi Zhou; QuanQiu Wang; Chunlei Zheng; A John Rush; Nora D Volkow; Rong Xu
Journal:  Mol Psychiatry       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 15.992

4.  Dietary Rice Bran-Modified Human Gut Microbial Consortia Confers Protection against Colon Carcinogenesis Following Fecal Transfaunation.

Authors:  Kristopher D Parker; Akhilendra K Maurya; Hend Ibrahim; Sangeeta Rao; Petronella R Hove; Dileep Kumar; Rama Kant; Bupinder Raina; Rajesh Agarwal; Kristine A Kuhn; Komal Raina; Elizabeth P Ryan
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2021-02-03

5.  Automatic extraction, prioritization and analysis of gut microbial metabolites from biomedical literature.

Authors:  QuanQiu Wang; Rong Xu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-06-19       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Data-driven multiple-level analysis of gut-microbiome-immune-joint interactions in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  QuanQiu Wang; Rong Xu
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 3.969

Review 7.  Challenges in the construction of knowledge bases for human microbiome-disease associations.

Authors:  Varsha Dave Badal; Dustin Wright; Yannis Katsis; Ho-Cheol Kim; Austin D Swafford; Rob Knight; Chun-Nan Hsu
Journal:  Microbiome       Date:  2019-09-05       Impact factor: 14.650

8.  Analysis of prognosis, genome, microbiome, and microbial metabolome in different sites of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Yang Xi; Pan Yuefen; Wu Wei; Qi Quan; Zhuang Jing; Xu Jiamin; Han Shuwen
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 5.531

Review 9.  Colorectal cancer: The epigenetic role of microbiome.

Authors:  Hussein Sabit; Emre Cevik; Huseyin Tombuloglu
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2019-11-26       Impact factor: 1.337

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.