| Literature DB >> 31798840 |
Vu Thi Ngoc Bich1,2, Le Viet Thanh1,3, Pham Duy Thai4, Tran Thi Van Phuong4, Melissa Oomen5, Christel Driessen5, Erik Beuken5, Tran Huy Hoang4, H Rogier van Doorn1,6, John Penders5, Heiman F L Wertheim2,6.
Abstract
Background: Antibiotic resistance is a major global public health threat. Antibiotic use can directly impact the antibiotic resistant genes (ARGs) profile of the human intestinal microbiome and consequently the environment through shedding.Entities:
Keywords: Antibiotic use; Environmental resistome; Mcr-1; Mcr-3; Resistome; Vietnam
Year: 2019 PMID: 31798840 PMCID: PMC6883630 DOI: 10.1186/s13756-019-0645-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Antimicrob Resist Infect Control ISSN: 2047-2994 Impact factor: 4.887
Fig. 1Sample population of study and sample selected of ARG explorative study
Study population characteristics (1.a) Age distribution occupation and antibiotic use, (1.b) direct environmental characteristics of households
| 1.a | |||
| Variables | No. (%) | ||
| Resident (n = 359) | Enrolled (n = 265) | Resistome analysis (n = 93) | |
| 32.1 ± 19.2 | 32.4 ± 19.6 | 29.4 ± 18.9 | |
| 0 to 11 | 61 (17.0) | 54 (20.4) | 23 (25) |
| 12 to 18 | 52 (14.5) | 39 (14.7) | 12 (13) |
| 19 to 55 | 192 (53.5) | 133 (50.2) | 50 (54) |
| > 56 | 54 (15.0) | 39 (14.7) | 8 (9.0) |
| 170 (47.4) | 117 (44.5) | 38 (41) | |
| Farmer | 154 (42.9) | 115 (43.0) | 36 (39) |
| Health care staff | 6 (1.7) | 2 (0.8) | 0 (0) |
| Worker | 36 (10.0) | 23 (8.7) | 10 (11) |
| Others (teacher, engineer, accountant, etc) | 47 (13.1) | 28 (10.6) | 13 (11) |
| Antibiotic use during 6 months follow up | |||
| Yes | 97 (27.0) | 93 (35.1) | 39 (42) |
| Beta lactam (amoxicillin, cefepime, cefexime, cephalexin, penicillin) | 88 (90.7) | 84 (90.3) | 39 (100) |
| 1.b | |||
| Variables | No. (%) | ||
| Number of HH (n = 80) | HHs in resistome analysis (n = 40) | ||
| Main water | |||
| Rain water | 75 (94) | 38 (95) | |
| Drain well water | 74 (93) | 36 (90) | |
| Cleaned water | 5 (6) | 2 (5) | |
| River water | 16 (20) | 6 (15) | |
| Domestic animal | |||
| Chicken | 56 (70) | 27 (68) | |
| Dog | 63 (79) | 31 (78) | |
| Pig | 9 (11) | 5 (12) | |
| Other (cow, duck, goose, bird, etc) | 62 (78) | ||
| Origin of fertilizer used for vegetable culture | |||
| Human | 1 (1) | 1 (2) | |
| Animal | 13 (16) | 8 (20) | |
| Chemical | 27 (34) | 14 (35) | |
The prevalence of AGRs among human, animal, food and water obtained from a subset 304 samples from 40 households
| Antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) | Human (n, %)‡ | Animal (n, %)‡
| Food (n, %)‡
| Water (n, %)‡
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 82 (88)b, c | 42 (93)d, e | 10 (13)b, d, f | 2 (2)c, e, f | |
| 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1 (1) | 0 (0) | |
| 51 (55)b, c | 23 (51)d, e | 21 (28)b, d, f | 6 (7)c, e, f | |
| 0 (0) | 1 (2) | 1 (1) | 0 (0) | |
| 0 (0) | 2 (4) | 3 (4) | 5 (6) | |
| 4 (4)b | 2 (4) | 10 (13)b | 14 (15) | |
| 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | |
| 0 (0)b | 0 (0) | 6 (8)b, f | 2 (2)f | |
| 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | |
| 35 (38)b, c | 15 (33)d, e | 5 (7)b, d | 2 (2)c, e | |
| 17 (18)c | 6 (13)e | 17 (22)f | 0 (0)c, f | |
| 57 (61)a,b,c | 13 (29)a,d,e | 2 (3)b, d | 0 (0)c, e | |
| 9 (9)a | 22 (49)a,d,e | 9 (12)d, f | 5 (6)e, f | |
| 93 (100)a,b,c | 41 (91)a,d,e | 59 (78)b, d, f | 30 (33)c,e,f |
‡Differential proportion of ARGs among sample types was compared using Pearson’s Chi square or Fisher’s exact. Letters a,b,c,d,e,f indicate statistically significant differences (P-value< 0.05) between two sample types (ahuman animal, bhuman and food, chuman and water, danimal and food, eanimal and water, fwater and food)
The proportion of ARGs in the comparison between humans who used antibiotic and those who did not use antibiotics
| Antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) | No use antibiotic, n/N (%) | Use antibiotic, n/N (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1/49 (2) | 7/44 (16) | 0.025 | |
| 49/49 (100) | 44/44 (100) | 1 | |
| 14/49 (29) | 21/44 (48) | 0.086 | |
| 8/49 (16) | 9/44 (20) | 0.789 | |
| 29/49 (59) | 28/44 (64) | 0.676 | |
| 44/49 (90) | 38/44 (86) | 0.751 | |
| 23/49 (47) | 24/44 (54) | 0.535 | |
| 2/49 (4) | 2/44 (5) | 1 |
‡Differential proportion of ARGs among two groups was compared using Pearson’s Chi square or Fisher’s exact, P-value < 0.05 was considered significant
Fig. 2Comparison of the relative abundance of ARGs between people who used antibiotics versus those who did not use antibiotics in the 4 months preceding sample collection. *indicates p < 0.05 as determined by Wilcoxon test
Fig. 3Principal Component Analysis (PCA) plots (a) showing the ordination of samples according to their ARGs profiles. Samples are colored according to their origin: animal feces (red), human feces (green), meat (dark blue), vegetable (light blue) or water (purple). The ellipses represent a 95% confidence interval of samples of the same origin. Loading scores (b) of the ARGs on the first and second principal component. Boxplots (c) showing the scores on the first and second principle component of samples of the same origin