| Literature DB >> 27198232 |
Nguyen Van Cuong1, Nguyen Thi Nhung1, Nguyen Huu Nghia1, Nguyen Thi Mai Hoa1, Nguyen Vinh Trung2, Guy Thwaites1,3, Juan Carrique-Mas4,5.
Abstract
Antimicrobials are extensively used as growth promoters in animal feeds worldwide, but reliable estimates are lacking. We conducted an internet-based survey of commercial chicken and pig feed products officially approved for sale in Vietnam over the period March-June 2015. Information on the antimicrobial contents in feed products, alongside animal production data, was used to estimate in-feed antimicrobial consumption to produce one kilogram of live animal (chicken, pig), as well as to estimate country-wide antimicrobial consumption through animal feeds. A total of 1462 commercial feed formulations were examined. The survey-adjusted estimated antimicrobial contents were 25.7 and 62.3 mg/kg in chicken and pig feeds, respectively. Overall, it was estimated that 77.4 mg [95% CI 48.1-106.8] and 286.6 mg [95% CI 191.6-418.3] of in-feed antimicrobials were used to raise 1 kg of live chicken and pig, respectively. Bacitracin (15.5% feeds), chlortetracycline (11.4%), and enramycin (10.8%) were the most common antimicrobials present in chicken feed formulations, whereas bacitracin (24.8%), chlortetracycline (23.9%), and florfenicol (17.4%) were the most common in pig feed formulations. Overall, 57% of the total quantitative usage consisted of antimicrobials regarded by WHO of importance for human medicine, including amoxicillin, colistin, tetracyclines, neomycin, lincomycin, and bacitracin. These figures confirm a very high magnitude of in-feed consumption of antimicrobials, especially in pig production. Results from this study should encourage further monitoring of antimicrobials used in animal production, and foster discussion about existing policies on inclusion of antimicrobials in animal feed rations.Entities:
Keywords: Vietnam; animal production; antimicrobial; antimicrobial drug resistance
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27198232 PMCID: PMC5063901 DOI: 10.1007/s10393-016-1130-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ecohealth ISSN: 1612-9202 Impact factor: 3.184
Sources of Data Used to Carry Out Bootstrap Simulations to Estimate Amounts of Antimicrobial Consumption Through feed Among Chickens and Pigs in Vietnam.
| Chickens | Pigs | Source | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Weight at slaughter (kg) (mean ± SD) | 1.77 kg (±0.32) | 92.50 kg (±20.0) | Kinh and Hai ( |
| FCF (mean ± SD) | 2.85 (±0.36) | 3.90 (±0.78) | Kinh and Hai ( |
| Duration of production (weeks) | 13.0 | 37.0 | Author’s estimates |
| Annual animal weight production (thousand tons) | 545.0a | 3217.9 | GSO ( |
aAssuming that chickens represent 73% of overall poultry production, according to Desvaux and Ton (2008); FCF feed conversion factor; SD standard deviation.
Number of Antimicrobials Reported in 1821 Livestock and Poultry Commercial Feeds Investigated.
| Pigs | Chickens | Ducks/muscovy ducks | Quails | Cattle/ruminants | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No antimicrobials | 303 | 159 | 129 | 30 | 40 | 661 |
| 1 antimicrobial | 231 | 101 | 13 | 7 | 0 | 352 |
| 1 listed | 207 | 91 | 13 | 7 | – | 318 |
| 2 listed | 18 | 10 | – | – | – | 28 |
| 3–5 listed | 6 | – | – | – | – | 6 |
| 2 antimicrobials | 75 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 90 |
| 3 antimicrobials | 71 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 71 |
| With antimicrobial | 377 | 116 | 13 | 7 | 0 | 513 |
| Number of products with data | 680 | 275 | 142 | 37 | 40 | 1174 |
| All products investigated | 977 | 485 | 249 | 60 | 50 | 1821 |
Description of the Antimicrobial Contents of Chicken and Pig Commercial Feeds Available in the Vietnamese Market.
| Antimicrobial | Antimicrobial class | Chickens | Pigs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Percent feeds containing (%) | mg/kg (±SD) | Percent feeds containing (%) | mg/kg (±SD) | ||||
| Unadjusted | Adjusted [95% CI] | Unadjusted | Adjusted [95% CI] | ||||
| Chlortetracyclineb | Tetracycline | 10.9 | 11.4 [7.4–15.5] | 81.1 (±24.9) | 29.8 | 23.9 [20.7–27.2] | 62.2 (±15.2) |
| Bacitracinc | Polypeptide | 18.5 | 15.5 [10.9–20.1] | 71.1 (±22.3) | 13.2 | 24.7 [16.3–47.9] | 42.2 (±12.8) |
| Colistina | Polymyxin | 6.9 | 7.4 [4.0–10.8] | 71.6 (±15.2) | 9.3 | 12.1 [8.9–15.2] | 122.4 (±35.8) |
| Enramycin | Polypeptide | 8.0 | 10.8 [6.1–15.4] | 13.2 (±3.8) | 5.3 | 8.0 [5.4–10.7] | 35.2 (±8.5) |
| Tylosin | Macrolide | – | – | – | 15.4 | 10.6 [8.4–12.9] | 40.8 (±7.0) |
| Florfenicol | Amphenicol | – | – | – | 7.9 | 17.4 [13.3–21.4] | 96.9 (±22.3) |
| Lincomycinc | Lincosamides | 1.1 | 1.33 [0.5–2.2] | 4.0 (±0.0) | 0.4 | 1.1 [0.2–2.0] | 54.3 (±14.8) |
| Oxytetracyclineb | Tetracycline | – | – | – | 1.5 | 0.9 [0.3–1.5] | 54.5 (±7.9) |
| Neomycina | Aminoglycoside | – | – | – | 0.7 | 0.9 [0.3–1.5] | 100.0 (±0.0) |
| Tiamulin | Pleuromutilin | – | – | – | 0.3 | 0.2 [0–0.4] | 119.0 (±3.8) |
| Avilamycin | Orthosomycine | 0.4 | 0.2 [0.01–0.6] | 10.0 (±0.0) | 0.7 | 0.3 [0.1–0.5] | 10.0 (±0.0) |
| Amoxicillina |
| – | – | – | 0.7 | 1.1 [0.2–2.0] | 212.0 (±42.5) |
| Halquinol | Chlorhydroxyquinolone | – | – | – | 0.01 | 0.1 [0–0.1] | 180.0 (±0.0) |
| Tylvalosin | Macrolide | – | – | – | 0.1 | 0.3 [0–0.9] | 100.0 (±0.0) |
| Any antimicrobial | 42.2 | 48.6 [41.7–55. 6] | 55.4 | 58.8 [54.4–63.2] | |||
The quantitative data only refer to those products reporting the inclusion of each specific antimicrobial.
CI confidence interval.
aAntimicrobial ‘of critical importance.’
bAntimicrobial ‘of high importance.’
cAntimicrobial ‘of importance’ (according to WHO 2011).
Figure 1Estimated antimicrobial consumption among Vietnamese chickens and pigs raised with commercial feed rations. The bars represent results (average) obtained from 100,000 simulations. Black lines represent 95% confidence intervals resulting from the variable probability of inclusion of commercial feeds with each specific antimicrobial
Figure 2Quantitative estimates of antimicrobials used in chicken and pig production in Vietnam based on animal production figures and survey results