Literature DB >> 28221105

Zoonotic Transmission of mcr-1 Colistin Resistance Gene from Small-Scale Poultry Farms, Vietnam.

Nguyen Vinh Trung, Sébastien Matamoros, Juan J Carrique-Mas, Nguyen Huu Nghia, Nguyen Thi Nhung, Tran Thi Bich Chieu, Ho Huynh Mai, Willemien van Rooijen, James Campbell, Jaap A Wagenaar, Anita Hardon, Nguyen Thi Nhu Mai, Thai Quoc Hieu, Guy Thwaites, Menno D de Jong, Constance Schultsz, Ngo Thi Hoa.   

Abstract

We investigated the consequences of colistin use in backyard chicken farms in Vietnam by examining the prevalence of mcr-1 in fecal samples from chickens and humans. Detection of mcr-1-carrying bacteria in chicken samples was associated with colistin use and detection in human samples with exposure to mcr-1-positive chickens.

Entities:  

Keywords:  E. coli; Vietnam; antibiotic resistance; antimicrobial resistance; backyard farm; bacteria; chicken; colistin; colistin resistance; fecal colonization; food production; poultry farms; small-scale farm; transmission; zoonoses

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28221105      PMCID: PMC5382726          DOI: 10.3201/eid2303.161553

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis        ISSN: 1080-6040            Impact factor:   6.883


Colistin resistance is a gradually emerging problem among gram-negative bacteria in clinical settings in many countries (). A transferable plasmid-derived colistin resistance gene mcr-1 discovered in China and subsequently found worldwide could be mediating this emergence (,). Use of colistin in animal production has been suggested as the most likely factor contributing to the emergence of the mcr-1 gene (). However, systematic studies applying the One Health approach to investigate the epidemiologic link between the use of colistin in agriculture and colonization with mcr-1–carrying bacteria in the community are lacking (). Colistin use in humans is negligible (), but it is one of the most commonly used antimicrobial drugs in animal production in Vietnam (). We investigated the consequences of colistin use in chicken farms by assessing chickens, farmers, and nearby persons for the presence of mcr-1–carrying bacteria and performing epidemiologic analyses to assess the risk for subsequent transmission to unexposed human populations in southern Vietnam.

The Study

From March 2012 to April 2013, we conducted a systematic, cross-sectional study examining antimicrobial drug use and colonization with antimicrobial-resistant E. coli in chickens and humans in Tien Giang Province, Vietnam. Fecal samples from 204 chicken farms and rectal swabs from 204 chicken farmers (1 farmer/farm) were collected as described (Technical Appendix 1) (,). We additionally collected rectal swabs from age- and sex-matched persons not involved in poultry farming from the same districts (rural persons, n = 204) and from their provincial capitals (urban persons, n = 102) (). Samples were cultured on MacConkey plates with and without antimicrobial drugs. A sweep of the full growth on plain MacConkey plates was collected and screened for the presence of mcr-1 by PCR as described previously (). Logistic regression models were built to investigate the risk factors associated with the presence of mcr-1 on chicken farms and in human participants. Then, we selected (using a random number table) individual E. coli colonies (n = 200) and extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)–producing E. coli colonies (n = 122) growing on different MacConkey plates and repeated PCR to confirm the presence of mcr-1 in E. coli isolated from chickens and humans. We tested all mcr-1–positive E. coli isolates for colistin susceptibility using Etest (bioMérieux, Marcy l’Etoile, France) and interpreted test results in accordance with the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing breakpoints (). In addition, whole-genome sequencing was performed on all mcr-1–positive E. coli isolates as described (Technical Appendix 1). From a total of 204 chicken and 510 human fecal specimens, 188 and 440 MacConkey sweeps were available for mcr-1 screening by PCR, respectively. The adjusted prevalence of mcr-1 was 59.4% (95% CI 47.9%–71.0%) in chicken and 20.6% (95% CI 15.9%–25.2%) in human fecal samples (Table 1).
Table 1

Prevalence of fecal colonization with mcr-1–carrying bacteria in chickens and humans, Tien Giang Province, Vietnam, 2012–2013

SourcePrevalence of fecal colonization with mcr-1–carrying bacteria
No. positive sweeps/total (%)Adjusted prevalence, % (95% CI)
All chicken farms93/188 (49.5)59.4 (47.9–71.0)
Household chicken farms53/94 (56.4)59.5 (47.9–71.1)
Small-scale chicken farms40/94 (42.6)47.9 (35.4–60.3)
All human participants84/440 (19.1)20.6 (15.9–25.2)
All farmers45/179 (25.1)25.2 (18.3–32.0)
Farmers exposed to mcr-1–negative chickens16/91 (17.6)15.5 (7.7–23.3)
Farmers exposed to mcr-1–positive chickens29/88 (33.0)34.7 (23.9–45.5)
Rural persons31/173 (17.9)17.6 (11.6–23.7)
Urban persons8/88 (9.1)9.1 (3.1–15.1)
Among 200 E. coli isolates, mcr-1 was detected in 10/78 (12.8%) isolates from chickens, 2/50 (4.0%) isolates from farmers, and 0/72 isolates from persons who did not farm. Similarly, mcr-1 was detected in 9/38 (23.7%) and 1/44 (2.3%) of ESBL-producing E. coli isolated from chickens and farmers, respectively. The MIC of colistin for the 22 mcr-1–carrying E. coli isolates ranged 3–4 mg/L. Because the Etest might underestimate the true MIC (), these results indicate reduced susceptibility. Single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)–based phylogenetic analyses of the core genomes showed little genomic similarity between isolates, but the analyses did show many isolates belonged to the same multilocus sequence types (n = 14) (Figure). Analysis of the acquired resistance genes, reflecting the presence of an accessory genome, showed a large variation in resistance gene content, with only the tet(A) gene, encoding for tetracycline resistance, present in all genomes (Technical Appendix 2 Table). De novo bacterial genome assembly was performed, and the contigs carrying mcr-1 were analyzed. A replication origin could be located in 5 isolates, leading to the identification of plasmid incompatibility groups IncHI2 (1 isolate), IncI2 (2 isolates), and combined IncHI2 and IncHI2A (2 isolates). Transposon ISAplI, initially described as carrying the mcr-1 gene (), was identified in 18 of 22 contigs.
Figure

Phylogenetic analyses of mcr-1–positive Escherichia coli isolated from chickens and chicken farmers, Vietnam, 2012–2013. Maximum-likelihood tree of 22 mcr-1–carrying E. coli isolated from 15 chicken fecal samples and 3 human fecal swab samples (underlined), constructed by using CSI Phylogeny 1.4 (https://cge.cbs.dtu.dk//services/CSIPhylogeny/), shows a genome-wide single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) comparison. A total of 74,585 SNPs were concatenated for pairwise comparison (difference between pairs 0–32,267 SNPs). The multilocus sequence types (ST) are indicated next to the isolate names. The ST155 isolates CG05C.C1 and CG05C.C2 differ by 1 SNP; the ST10 isolates CG48C.A2 and CG48C.G2 differ by 1 SNP and 1 antimicrobial resistance gene; the ST156 isolates CT48C.C1 and CT48C.C2 differ by 4 SNPs and 3 antimicrobial resistance genes; and the ST50 isolates CT67C.C1 and CT67C.C2 are phenotypically different but have 0 SNP differences and originate from the same sample and are therefore likely to be highly related or identical. Scale bar indicates number of nucleotide substitutions per site.

Phylogenetic analyses of mcr-1–positive Escherichia coli isolated from chickens and chicken farmers, Vietnam, 2012–2013. Maximum-likelihood tree of 22 mcr-1–carrying E. coli isolated from 15 chicken fecal samples and 3 human fecal swab samples (underlined), constructed by using CSI Phylogeny 1.4 (https://cge.cbs.dtu.dk//services/CSIPhylogeny/), shows a genome-wide single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) comparison. A total of 74,585 SNPs were concatenated for pairwise comparison (difference between pairs 0–32,267 SNPs). The multilocus sequence types (ST) are indicated next to the isolate names. The ST155 isolates CG05C.C1 and CG05C.C2 differ by 1 SNP; the ST10 isolates CG48C.A2 and CG48C.G2 differ by 1 SNP and 1 antimicrobial resistance gene; the ST156 isolates CT48C.C1 and CT48C.C2 differ by 4 SNPs and 3 antimicrobial resistance genes; and the ST50 isolates CT67C.C1 and CT67C.C2 are phenotypically different but have 0 SNP differences and originate from the same sample and are therefore likely to be highly related or identical. Scale bar indicates number of nucleotide substitutions per site. We investigated risk factors for fecal colonization with mcr-1–carrying bacteria separately for small-scale farms and household farms because a joint model did not converge due to inflated sampling weight assigned to household chicken farms (Technical Appendix 1 Table 1). Multivariate analysis identified the presence of younger chickens (<20.5 weeks old) and the use of colistin as independent risk factors for fecal colonization with mcr-1–carrying bacteria in chickens (odds ratios [ORs] 21.3 and 5.1, respectively) in small-scale farms (Table 2). We were unable to identify potential risk factors associated with fecal colonization with mcr-1-carrying bacteria in chickens in household farms. Among human participants, farmers who were exposed to mcr-1–positive chickens showed a significantly increased risk for colonization with mcr-1–carrying bacteria (OR 5.3; Table 2) in contrast with urban individuals not involved in chicken farming, rural individuals not exposed to chickens, and farmers with mcr-1–negative chickens.
Table 2

Multivariate analysis of risk factors associated with fecal colonization with mcr-1–carrying bacteria in small-scale chicken farms (N = 94) and in humans (N = 440), Vietnam, 2012–2013*

Variables
No. tested
No. mcr-1–positive
OR (95% CI)
p value
Small-scale chicken farms
Age of chickens
Chickens <20.5 weeks old473221.3 (5.8–78.5)<0.001
Chickens ≥20.5 weeks old478Referent
Use of colistin
21
14
5.1 (1.4–18.8)
0.017
Humans
Urban persons†888Referent
Rural persons†173312.1 (0.9–5.0)0.075
Farmers exposed to mcr-1–negative chickens91161.8 (0.7–4.7)0.205
Farmers exposed to mcr-1–positive chickens88295.3 (2.2–12.7)<0.001

*OR, odds ratio.
†Not involved in poultry farming.

*OR, odds ratio.
†Not involved in poultry farming.

Conclusions

Our study shows that colonization with mcr-1–carrying bacteria in chickens is associated with colistin usage and colonization of humans is associated with exposure to mcr-1–positive chickens. These findings suggest that colistin use is the main driver for the observed high prevalence (59.4%) of mcr-1 in fecal samples from chickens, with zoonotic transmission explaining the high prevalence (34.7%) in farmers. Zoonotic transmission of colistin-resistant E. coli from a domesticated pig () and companion animals () to humans has been reported. We found that younger chickens were more likely to be colonized with mcr-1–carrying bacteria than older chickens (>20.5 weeks), probably because of the higher antimicrobial treatment incidence in younger chickens (74.0 [interquartile range 0–278]/1,000 chickens treated daily with 1 defined daily dose) than in older chickens (46.3 [interquartile range 0–124]/1,000 chickens treated daily with 1 defined daily dose) (N.V. Trung, unpub. data). However, our study was insufficiently powered to detect such an association in multivariate analysis. In addition, the gastrointestinal tract of younger chickens might be colonized by antimicrobial-resistant bacteria more readily than older chickens (). The spread of the mcr-1 gene on different plasmid types (IncI2, IncHI2, and IncHI2A) might explain its successful spread in different E. coli clones. We also identified the ISApl1 transposon in 81.8% (18/22) of our isolates. Because this genetic element is involved in horizontal gene transfer, it is likely to be a key factor contributing to the widespread dissemination of mcr-1 (). Our study is subject to several limitations. First, the cross-sectional study design precludes the demonstration of direct transmission of the mcr-1 gene between chickens and humans. Second, the presence of colistin in chicken feeds could not be verified and thus misclassification of farms in terms of their colistin use was possible. Last, we did not screen for the mcr-2 gene, which is also involved in colistin resistance (). In summary, our results show an association between colistin use on farms and the presence of the mcr-1 gene in animals. Given the potentially serious consequences of the spread of the mcr-1 gene from food production animals to humans, prudent use of antimicrobial drugs in animal production should be enforced globally, including in small-scale and household farms.

Technical Appendix 1

Detailed materials and methods describing the selection and recruitment of study subjects, data collection, sample analyses, real-time PCR detection of the mcr-1 gene, adjustment of prevalence estimates, whole-genome sequencing analyses, and risk factor analyses. Univariate analyses of the risk factors associated with the presence of mcr-1–carrying bacteria in chickens and humans in Vietnam in 2012−2013, comparison of characteristics of study participants and farms included and excluded from the risk factor analyses, and use of antimicrobial drugs in chickens and humans in southern Vietnam.

Technical Appendix 2

Characteristics of mcr-1–positive Escherichia coli from chickens and farmers, Vietnam, 2012–2013.
  12 in total

1.  Worldwide emergence of colistin resistance in Klebsiella pneumoniae from healthy humans and patients in Lao PDR, Thailand, Israel, Nigeria and France owing to inactivation of the PhoP/PhoQ regulator mgrB: an epidemiological and molecular study.

Authors:  Abiola Olumuyiwa Olaitan; Seydina M Diene; Marie Kempf; Meryem Berrazeg; Sofiane Bakour; Sushim Kumar Gupta; Boupha Thongmalayvong; Kongsap Akkhavong; Silaphet Somphavong; Phimpha Paboriboune; Kittipong Chaisiri; Chalit Komalamisra; Olawale Olufemi Adelowo; Obasola Ezekiel Fagade; Omowunmi Abosede Banjo; Adeyeye James Oke; Amos Adler; Marc Victor Assous; Serge Morand; Didier Raoult; Jean-Marc Rolain
Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents       Date:  2014-09-06       Impact factor: 5.283

2.  Identification of a novel plasmid-mediated colistin-resistance gene, mcr-2, in Escherichia coli, Belgium, June 2016.

Authors:  Basil Britto Xavier; Christine Lammens; Rohit Ruhal; Samir Kumar-Singh; Patrick Butaye; Herman Goossens; Surbhi Malhotra-Kumar
Journal:  Euro Surveill       Date:  2016-07-07

3.  Plasmid-mediated colistin resistance (mcr-1 gene): three months later, the story unfolds.

Authors:  Robert L Skov; Dominique L Monnet
Journal:  Euro Surveill       Date:  2016

4.  A Model for Transposition of the Colistin Resistance Gene mcr-1 by ISApl1.

Authors:  Erik Snesrud; Susu He; Michael Chandler; John P Dekker; Alison B Hickman; Patrick McGann; Fred Dyda
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Impact of antimicrobial usage on antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli strains colonizing broiler chickens.

Authors:  J L Smith; D J V Drum; Y Dai; J M Kim; S Sanchez; J J Maurer; C L Hofacre; M D Lee
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-12-28       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 6.  Transferable resistance to colistin: a new but old threat.

Authors:  Stefan Schwarz; Alan P Johnson
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 5.790

7.  Emergence of plasmid-mediated colistin resistance mechanism MCR-1 in animals and human beings in China: a microbiological and molecular biological study.

Authors:  Yi-Yun Liu; Yang Wang; Timothy R Walsh; Ling-Xian Yi; Rong Zhang; James Spencer; Yohei Doi; Guobao Tian; Baolei Dong; Xianhui Huang; Lin-Feng Yu; Danxia Gu; Hongwei Ren; Xiaojie Chen; Luchao Lv; Dandan He; Hongwei Zhou; Zisen Liang; Jian-Hua Liu; Jianzhong Shen
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 25.071

8.  Prevalence and risk factors for carriage of antimicrobial-resistant Escherichia coli on household and small-scale chicken farms in the Mekong Delta of Vietnam.

Authors:  Vinh Trung Nguyen; Juan J Carrique-Mas; Thi Hoa Ngo; Huynh Mai Ho; Thanh Tuyen Ha; James I Campbell; Thi Nhung Nguyen; Ngoc Nhung Hoang; Van Minh Pham; Jaap A Wagenaar; Anita Hardon; Quoc Hieu Thai; Constance Schultsz
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2015-03-08       Impact factor: 5.790

9.  Non-Typhoidal Salmonella Colonization in Chickens and Humans in the Mekong Delta of Vietnam.

Authors:  N V Trung; J J Carrique-Mas; N H Nghia; L T P Tu; H H Mai; H T Tuyen; J Campbell; N T Nhung; H N Nhung; P V Minh; T T B Chieu; T Q Hieu; N T N Mai; S Baker; J A Wagenaar; N T Hoa; C Schultsz
Journal:  Zoonoses Public Health       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 2.702

10.  Possible Transmission of mcr-1-Harboring Escherichia coli between Companion Animals and Human.

Authors:  Xue-Fei Zhang; Yohei Doi; Xi Huang; Hong-Yu Li; Lan-Lan Zhong; Kun-Jiao Zeng; Yan-Fen Zhang; Sandip Patil; Guo-Bao Tian
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 6.883

View more
  34 in total

Review 1.  Antibiotic usage and resistance in animal production in Vietnam: a review of existing literature.

Authors:  Khanh Nguyen Di; Duy Toan Pham; Tay Sun Tee; Quach An Binh; Thanh Cong Nguyen
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2021-06-05       Impact factor: 1.559

Review 2.  The rise and spread of mcr plasmid-mediated polymyxin resistance.

Authors:  Sue C Nang; Jian Li; Tony Velkov
Journal:  Crit Rev Microbiol       Date:  2019-05-23       Impact factor: 7.624

Review 3.  Multiresistant Gram-Negative Pathogens—A Zoonotic Problem.

Authors:  Robin Köck; Caroline Herr; Lothar Kreienbrock; Stefan Schwarz; Bernd-Alois Tenhagen; Birgit Walther
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2021-09-06       Impact factor: 5.594

4.  Carriage of Plasmid-Mediated Colistin Resistance-1-Positive Escherichia coli in Humans, Animals, and Environment on Farms in Vietnam.

Authors:  Phuong Thi Lan Nguyen; Hung Thi Mai Tran; Hai Anh Tran; Thai Duy Pham; Tan Minh Luong; Thanh Ha Nguyen; Lien Thi Phuong Nguyen; Tho Thi Thi Nguyen; Ha Thi An Hoang; Chi Nguyen; Duong Nhu Tran; Anh Duc Dang; Masato Suzuki; Thanh Viet Le; Anne-Laure Bañuls; Marc Choisy; Rogier H Van Doorn; Huy Hoang Tran
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 3.707

5.  Transmission routes of antibiotic resistant bacteria: a systematic review.

Authors:  Noortje G Godijk; Martin C J Bootsma; Marc J M Bonten
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2022-05-20       Impact factor: 3.667

Review 6.  Mobile Colistin Resistance (mcr) Genes in Cats and Dogs and Their Zoonotic Transmission Risks.

Authors:  Afaf Hamame; Bernard Davoust; Zineb Cherak; Jean-Marc Rolain; Seydina M Diene
Journal:  Pathogens       Date:  2022-06-17

7.  Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli from humans and chickens in the Mekong Delta of Vietnam is driven by antimicrobial usage and potential cross-species transmission.

Authors:  Nguyen Thi Nhung; Nguyen Thi Phuong Yen; Nguyen Thi Thuy Dung; Nguyen Thi Minh Nhan; Doan Hoang Phu; Bach Tuan Kiet; Guy Thwaites; Ronald B Geskus; Stephen Baker; Juan Carrique-Mas; Marc Choisy
Journal:  JAC Antimicrob Resist       Date:  2022-05-27

8.  Detection of Colistin-Resistant MCR-1-Positive Escherichia coli by Use of Assays Based on Inhibition by EDTA and Zeta Potential.

Authors:  Fernanda Esposito; Miriam R Fernandes; Ralf Lopes; Maria Muñoz; Caetano P Sabino; Marcos P Cunha; Ketrin C Silva; Rodrigo Cayô; Willames M B S Martins; Andrea M Moreno; Terezinha Knöbl; Ana C Gales; Nilton Lincopan
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2017-10-04       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 9.  Zoonotic diseases from birds to humans in Vietnam: possible diseases and their associated risk factors.

Authors:  Vu Thi Nga; Tran Uyen Ngoc; Le Bui Minh; Vo Truong Nhu Ngoc; Van-Huy Pham; Le Long Nghia; Nguyen Lan Hung Son; Thi Hong Van Pham; Nguyen Duy Bac; Tran Viet Tien; Nguyen Ngoc Minh Tuan; Yang Tao; Pau Loke Show; Dinh-Toi Chu
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 5.103

10.  Global phylogenetic analysis of Escherichia coli and plasmids carrying the mcr-1 gene indicates bacterial diversity but plasmid restriction.

Authors:  Sébastien Matamoros; Jarne M van Hattem; Maris S Arcilla; Niels Willemse; Damian C Melles; John Penders; Trung Nguyen Vinh; Ngo Thi Hoa; Martin C J Bootsma; Perry J van Genderen; Abraham Goorhuis; Martin Grobusch; Nicky Molhoek; Astrid M L Oude Lashof; Ellen E Stobberingh; Henri A Verbrugh; Menno D de Jong; Constance Schultsz
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-10       Impact factor: 4.996

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.