| Literature DB >> 31795054 |
Yi-Ai Rau1, Shi-Ming Wang2, Jacques-Donald Tournier3, Sung-Han Lin2, Chin-Song Lu4, Yi-Hsin Weng4, Yao-Liang Chen5, Shu-Hang Ng6, Shao-Wen Yu1, Yi-Ming Wu6, Chih-Chien Tsai7, Jiun-Jie Wang8.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Disruption to white matter pathways is an important contributor to the pathogenesis of Parkinson's disease. Fixel-based analysis has recently emerged as a useful fiber-specific tool for examining white matter structure. In this longitudinal study, we used Fixel-based analysis to investigate white matter changes occurring over time in patients with Parkinson's disease.Entities:
Keywords: Aging; Axon degeneration; Diffusion MRI; Fixel-based analysis; Parkinson's disease; White matter
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31795054 PMCID: PMC6889638 DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2019.102098
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Neuroimage Clin ISSN: 2213-1582 Impact factor: 4.881
General characteristics of the study subjects.
| HC (n=76) | PD (n=50) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I | II | III | IV* | ||
| Sex (men/women) | 38/38 | 27/23 | |||
| Age (yr) | 62.3±5.5 | 61.8±6.1 | |||
| Disease duration (yr) | N/A | 6.3±5.0 | |||
| Education (yr) | 12±4.2 | 10±4.5 | |||
| MHY | N/A | 1.9±0.8 (1-3, median=2) | 2.1±1.0 | 2.4±1.0 | < 0.001 |
| UPDRS | N/A | 28.1±15.0 | 32.3±18.6 | 38.4±22.3 | < 0.001 |
| I | N/A | 1.7±2.0 | 1.6±1.3 | 2.1±1.9 | 0.135 |
| II | N/A | 6.8±4.4 | 9.8±6.1 | 11.3±7.1 | < 0.001 |
| III | N/A | 18.1±10.4 | 19.4±12.1 | 23.2±15.1 | < 0.001 |
| IV | N/A | 1.6±1.9 | 1.5±2.3 | 1.8±2.1 | 0.519 |
| ADL(%) | N/A | 88.8±6.9 | 83.6± 11.6 | 79.2±15.0 | < 0.001 |
| PDQ39 | N/A | 22.9±19.9 | 35.8±23.9 | 36.8±25.6 | < 0.001 |
| MMSE | 29.1±1.1 | 27.4±2.7 | 28.1±3.5 | 27.9±2.7 | 0.166 |
| CDR | N/A | 0.2±0.2 (0-0.5, median=0.5) | 0.3±0.3 (0-1, median=0.5) | 0.4±0.3 | 0.002 |
Values are presented as means ± standard deviations, unless otherwise indicated.
HC = healthy control, PD = Parkinson's disease, N/A = data not available, UPDRS = Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale, MHY = modified Hoehn and Yahr scale, MMSE = Mini-Mental State Examination, CDR = Clinical Dementia Rating, ADL = Schwab and England activities of daily living, PDQ39 = 39-item Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire
*Analysis performed with one-way repeated measures ANOVA.
p value < 0.05 between the first follow-up assessment and baseline
p value < 0.001 between the first follow-up assessment and baseline
p value < 0.05 between the second and first follow-up assessments
p value < 0.01 between the second and first follow-up assessments
p value < 0.001 between the second and first follow-up assessments
p value < 0.01 between the second follow-up assessment and baseline
p value < 0.001 between the second follow-up assessment and baseline
Fig. 1Flowchart of imaging analysis. The procedures required for fixel-based analysis included (1) preprocessing, (2) estimation for distribution of fiber orientation (FOD), (3) development of study-specific templates, (4) creation of an analysis fixel mask, (5) Matching of the fixels from each subject to the template fixels (analysis fixel mask), and (6) calculation of fixel-based metrics. For white matter parcellation, we followed the procedure previously described by Lo et al. using the JHU DTI-based white matter atlas. (a): Selection of FOD amplitudes larger than 0.06 to create an analysis fixel mask of white matter. (b): Selection of the highest FOD amplitudes to create an analysis fixel mask with only major direction. MSMT-CSD: multi-shell multi-tissue constrained spherical deconvolution; FOD: fiber orientation distribution; FD: fiber density; FC: fiber-bundle cross-section; FDC: fiber density and cross-section; JHU: Johns Hopkins University.
Fig. 2Significant changes in fixel-based metrics over time. Areas of significant changes in fiber density (FD), fiber-bundle cross-section (FC), and fiber density and cross-section (FDC) during different study periods displayed stereoscopically in the superior left frontal view. Significant fixels (family-wise error corrected p < 0.05) were illustrated using streamline points and colored according to p-values. Cold colors denote reduction, whereas warm colors denote increase. Column (a): Significant areas between baseline and first follow-up; Column (b): Significant areas between first follow-up and second follow-up; Column (c): Significant areas between baseline and second follow-up. FD: fiber density; FC: fiber-bundle cross-section; FDC: fiber density and cross-section; scc: splenium of corpus callosum; tp: tapetum; bcc: body of corpus callosum; fx: fornix; gcc; genu of corpus callosum; sfb: superior frontal blade; cg: cingulum; Arrow head: left superior frontal white matter changes; Arrow: hyperdirect pathway.
Fig. 3Significant changes in fixel-based metrics between the second follow-up assessment and baseline. Significant fixels (family-wise error corrected p < 0.05) between the second follow-up assessment and baseline were displayed in the axial slices. They were colored according to p-values. Cold colors denote reduction, whereas warm colors denote increase. Top row: fiber density (FD) map; Middle row: fiber-bundle cross-section (FC) map; Bottom row: fiber density and cross-section (FDC) map. fx: fornix; gcc: genu of corpus callosum; cg: cingulum; tp: tapetum; scc: splenium of corpus callosum; bcc: body of corpus callosum.
Fig. 4Significant fixels colored by direction. Significant decreased fixels (family-wise error corrected p < 0.05) of fiber-bundle cross-section (FC) and fiber density and cross-section (FDC) between the second follow-up assessment and baseline (the only exception being (e)) were displayed in the axial (a, b), coronal (c, g), and sagittal (d–f, h) slices of a template map. They were colored according to the direction, as follows: anterior-to-posterior: green; superior-to-inferior: blue; and left-to-right: red. (e) and (f): Arrow heads point out the left frontal white matter changes between the first follow-up assessment and baseline ((e)) and the second follow-up assessment and baseline ((f)); (g): Arrows point out the hyperdirect pathways; (i): zoom in crossing-fiber area showed in (g); j: zoom in crossing-fiber area showed in (h). FD: fiber density; FC: fiber-bundle cross-section; FDC: fiber density and cross-section; cg: cingulum; scc: splenium of corpus callosum; mf: minor forceps; Mf: major forceps; gcc: genu of corpus callosum; tp: tapetum; bcc: body of corpus callosum. (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)
Fig. 5Significant findings from voxel-based analysis. Significant voxels (family-wise error) corrected p < 0.05) were colored according to p-values, and displayed in the axial slices. Row (a): areas characterized by a significant decrease in fractional anisotropy (FA) between baseline and the second follow-up assessment; row (b): areas characterized by a significant increase in mean diffusivity (MD) between baseline and the first follow-up assessment; row (c): areas characterized by a significant increase in MD between baseline and the second follow-up assessment. FA did not show significant differences between baseline and the first follow-up assessment.
Fig. 6Relationship between the longitudinal differences in clinical parameters and fixel-based metrics. Fixel-wise regression analysis was performed to identify the associations between longitudinal differences in clinical parameters and fixel-based metrics. Significant fixels (family-wise error corrected p < 0.05) were colored according to p-values and displayed in coronal view. Warm colors denote positive associations, whereas cold colors denote inverse relationships. FD: fiber density; FC: fiber-bundle cross-section; PDQ39: 39-item Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire; UPDRS: Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale; scc: splenium of corpus callosum; tp: tapetum; bcc: body of corpus callosum.
Fig 7Temporal course of fixel-based metrics in areas showing FDC reduction. Fig. 7 shows how FDC changes (panel a) could stem from variations in either FD (panel b) or FC (panel c). Fixels showing a significant decrease in FDC (family-wise error corrected p < 0.05) between the second follow-up and baseline were identified, from which both FD and FC were extracted. The average fixel-based metrics were expressed as percentage changes after normalization for baseline values. Seven regions of interest–including genu, body and splenium of corpus callosum, bilateral cingulum and tapetum—are reported. FDC: fiber density and cross-section; FD: fiber density; FC: fiber-bundle cross-section.
Fig. 8Relationship between fixel-based metrics and age. We performed fixel-wise regression analysis between age and baseline fixel-based metrics in both patients with PD and healthy control subjects. Family-wise error (FWE)-corrected p values (p < 0.05) were used. Significant fixels are shown using streamline points and colored p-values. In healthy control subjects, FDC and FC did not show any significant associations with age. Positive associations were not observed in patients with PD. Warm colors denote positive associations, whereas cold colors denote inverse associations. PD: Parkinson's disease; HC: healthy control; FD: fiber density; FC: fiber-bundle cross-section; FDC: fiber density and cross-section; pic: posterior internal capsule; fx: fornix; tp: tapetum; gcc: genu of corpus callosum; scc: splenium of corpus callosum; acr: anterior corona radiata, cg: cingulum.