| Literature DB >> 33421201 |
Angeliki Zarkali1, Peter McColgan2, Louise-Ann Leyland1, Andrew J Lees3, Rimona S Weil1,4,5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Visual dysfunction predicts dementia in Parkinson's disease (PD), but whether this translates to structural change is not known. The objectives of this study were to identify longitudinal white matter changes in patients with Parkinson's disease and low visual function and also in those who developed mild cognitive impairment.Entities:
Keywords: Parkinson's disease; Parkinson's disease dementia; diffusion weighted imaging; fixel; white matter
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33421201 PMCID: PMC8248368 DOI: 10.1002/mds.28477
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mov Disord ISSN: 0885-3185 Impact factor: 9.698
Demographics and results of clinical assessments
| Characteristic | Controls, n = 25 | PD high visual performers, n = 54 | PD low visual performers, n = 22 | Statistic |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) |
|
|
|
|
| Male (%) | 12 (48) | 26 (48.1) | 15 (68.2) |
χ 2 = 2.890
|
| Years of education | 17.8 (2.2) | 16.9 (2.9) | 18.1 (2.5) |
F = 1.919
|
| Total intracranial volume (cm3) | 1542.9 (121.3) | 1628.5 (189.1) | 1657.0 (146.8) |
F = 3.246
|
| Vision | ||||
| Contrast sensitivity (Pelli Robson) |
|
|
|
|
| Acuity (LogMar) | −0.1 (0.3) | −0.1 (0.2) | −0.1 (0.1) |
H = 3.232
|
| Color vision (D15) | 1.3 (2.4) | 2.7 (8.9) | 3.0 (4.9) |
H = 1.934
|
| General cognition | ||||
| MCI | — | 13 (24.1) | 13 (59.1) |
χ2 = 2.933
|
| MOCA | 29.0 (1.1) | 28.3 (1.9) | 27.0 (2.7) |
H = 8.333
|
| MMSE | 29.2 (0.9) | 29.1 (1.7) | 28.8 (1.2) |
H = 1.534
|
| Mood | ||||
| HADS anxiety | 3.5 (3.4) | 5.4 (3.7) | 6.5 (3.9) |
H = 8.201
|
| HADS depression |
|
|
|
|
| Disease‐specific measures | ||||
| Years from diagnosis | — | 3.8 (2.3) | 4.9 (2.8) |
t = −1.787
|
| UPDRS total score | — |
|
|
|
| UPDRS motor score | — | 22.4 (10.2) | 25.8 (16.2) |
t = −1.094
|
| Habitual hallucinations | — | 6 (11.1) | 6 (27.3) |
χ2 = 1.976
|
| UM‐PDHQ (hallucination severity score) | — | 0.5 (1.8) | 1.1 (2.1) |
t = −1.358
|
| LEDD | — | 401.4 (211.6) | 492.8 (225.5) |
t = −1.653
|
| RBDSQ | — | 4.0 (2.3) | 4.5 (1.9) |
t = −0.839
|
All data shown are mean (SD) except sex and MCI.
Statistical comparisons shown are across the 3 groups with subscript for post hoc results, except for diseasespecific measures (comparing PD low and high visual performers). In bold are characteristics that significantly differed between PD low visual performers and PD high visual performers.
MCI, mild cognitive impairment; HADS, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale; MMSE, Mini–Mental State Examination; MoCA, Montreal Cognitive Assessment; UPDRS, Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale; UM‐PDHQ, University of Miami Hallucinations Questionnaire; LEDD, levodopa‐equivalent dose; RBDSQ, REM Sleep Behavior Disorder Scale.
Statistically significant difference between PD high visual performers and PD low visual performers.
Statistically significant difference between PD high visual performers and controls.
Statistically significant difference between PD low visual performers and controls.
Best binocular score used; LogMAR, lower score implies better performance; Pelli Robson, higher score implies better performance.
FIG. 1Longitudinal changes in cognition in patients with Parkinson's disease. (A) Percentage of patients who developed mild cognitive impairment (PD‐MCI) in PD low visual performers compared with PD high visual performers. (B) Correlation between a marker of overall visual performance at baseline and combined cognitive performance at 18‐month follow‐up in patients with Parkinson's disease (95% confidence interval). Visual performance is presented as the summed z score of the 2 computer‐based visual tasks (cats and dogs task and biological motion task: Z = Z biolmotion + Z cats&dogs). Cognitive performance is presented as combined cognitive score (z scored against the performance of age‐matched controls). (C) Longitudinal change in combined cognitive score, MMSE and MoCA in PD low visual performers, PD high visual performers, and controls. Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals. MMSE, Mini–Mental State Examination; MoCA, Montreal Cognitive Assessment. [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
FIG. 2Macrostructural white matter changes in patients with Parkinson's disease and low visual performance over time. (A) Changes in white matter macrostructure (as seen by reduction in fiber cross‐section [FC]) in PD low visual performers compared with PD high visual performers (FWE‐corrected P < 0.05) in session 1 (baseline, left), at longitudinal change (difference between the 2 images, middle), and in session 2 (18 months follow‐up, right). Results are presented as streamlines and colored by percentage reduction. (B) Statistically significant (FWE‐corrected P < 0.05) longitudinal reductions in fiber cross‐section (FC) in PD low visual performers compared with PD high visual performers. Results are colored by percentage reduction. [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
FIG. 3Fiber tract–specific reductions at baseline in PD low visual performers compared with PD high visual performers and PD with mild cognitive impairment compared with PD with normal cognition from whole‐brain fixel‐based analysis. (A) PD low visual performers showed widespread microstructural (changes in fiber density [FD]) compared with PD high visual performers, with reductions within the genu, body, and splenium of the corpus callosum, the right internal capsule, the cingulum bilaterally, tapetum bilaterally, posterior thalamic radiations bilaterally, right hippocampus, and the right corticospinal tract. Macrostructural changes (changes in fiber density) were also seen within the splenium of the corpus callosum, the right cingulum, and bilateral posterior thalamic radiations. Changes in the combined FDC metric were seen within the genu, body, and splenium of the corpus callosum, the right internal capsule, the cingulum bilaterally, tapetum bilaterally, posterior thalamic radiations bilaterally, right hippocampus, and the right corticospinal tract; these represent impaired overall ability to relay information in these tracts in PD low visual performers. (B) Patients with Parkinson's disease who developed mild cognitive impairment (MCI) showed macrostructural changes (changes in fiber cross‐section [FC]) compared with Parkinson's disease with stable vision within the genu and splenium of the corpus callosum, posterior thalamic radiations bilaterally and the right hippocampus. Changes in the combined FDC metric are seen in the genu and the right hippocampus; this represents impaired overall ability to relay information in these tracts in PD‐MCI compared with PD with normal cognition (NC). No changes were seen in the FD metric for this patient group. Results are displayed as streamlines; these correspond to fixels that significantly differed between PD low and high visual performers (FWE‐corrected P < 0.05). Streamlines are colored by percentage reduction (color bars). More details on the baseline changes seen in these groups are seen in Figure S2. [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
FIG. 4Significant tracts in Parkinson's low performers; tract of interest analysis. (A) Anatomical representation of all analyzed tracts. PTR, posterior thalamic and optic radiations; SLF, superior longitudinal fasciculi; IFOF, Inferior fronto‐occipital fasciculi (segmentation includes the inferior longitudinal fasciculus); and SLF, superior fronto‐occipital fasciculi. (B) Baseline visit. Reduction (mean, 95% CI) in fiber cross‐section (FC) visualized as percentage reduction from the mean of patients with Parkinson's disease with high visual performance. Tracts with significantly reduced FC (FDR‐corrected P < 0.05) are shown in color, whereas tracts with no significant changes in FDC are plotted in gray. L, left; R, right; C, visit 2 (18‐month follow‐up). Reduction (mean, 95% CI) in fiber cross‐section (FC) visualized as percentage reduction from the mean of patients with Parkinson's disease with high visual performance at follow‐up. All 11 of the selected tracts showed significantly reduced FC (FDR‐corrected P < 0.05). L, left; R, right. [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]