PURPOSE: Fully automatic tissue segmentation is an essential step to translate quantitative MRI techniques to clinical setting. The goal of this study was to develop a novel approach based on the generative adversarial networks for fully automatic segmentation of knee cartilage and meniscus. THEORY AND METHODS: Defining proper loss function for semantic segmentation to enforce the learning of multiscale spatial constraints in an end-to-end training process is an open problem. In this work, we have used the conditional generative adversarial networks to improve segmentation performance of convolutional neural network, such as UNet alone by overcoming the problems caused by pixel-wise mapping based objective functions, and to capture cartilage features during the training of the network. Furthermore, the Dice coefficient and cross entropy losses were incorporated to the loss functions to improve the model performance. The model was trained and tested on 176, 3D DESS (double-echo steady-state) knee images from the Osteoarthritis Initiative data set. RESULTS: The proposed model provided excellent segmentation performance for cartilages with Dice coefficients ranging from 0.84 in patellar cartilage to 0.91 in lateral tibial cartilage, with an average Dice coefficient of 0.88. For meniscus segmentation, the model achieves 0.89 Dice coefficient for lateral meniscus and 0.87 Dice coefficient for medial meniscus. The results are superior to previously published automatic cartilage and meniscus segmentation methods based on deep learning models such as convolutional neural network. CONCLUSION: The proposed UNet-conditional generative adversarial networks based model demonstrated a fully automated segmentation method with high accuracy for knee cartilage and meniscus.
PURPOSE: Fully automatic tissue segmentation is an essential step to translate quantitative MRI techniques to clinical setting. The goal of this study was to develop a novel approach based on the generative adversarial networks for fully automatic segmentation of knee cartilage and meniscus. THEORY AND METHODS: Defining proper loss function for semantic segmentation to enforce the learning of multiscale spatial constraints in an end-to-end training process is an open problem. In this work, we have used the conditional generative adversarial networks to improve segmentation performance of convolutional neural network, such as UNet alone by overcoming the problems caused by pixel-wise mapping based objective functions, and to capture cartilage features during the training of the network. Furthermore, the Dice coefficient and cross entropy losses were incorporated to the loss functions to improve the model performance. The model was trained and tested on 176, 3D DESS (double-echo steady-state) knee images from the Osteoarthritis Initiative data set. RESULTS: The proposed model provided excellent segmentation performance for cartilages with Dice coefficients ranging from 0.84 in patellar cartilage to 0.91 in lateral tibial cartilage, with an average Dice coefficient of 0.88. For meniscus segmentation, the model achieves 0.89 Dice coefficient for lateral meniscus and 0.87 Dice coefficient for medial meniscus. The results are superior to previously published automatic cartilage and meniscus segmentation methods based on deep learning models such as convolutional neural network. CONCLUSION: The proposed UNet-conditional generative adversarial networks based model demonstrated a fully automated segmentation method with high accuracy for knee cartilage and meniscus.
Authors: Gary H Chang; David T Felson; Shangran Qiu; Ali Guermazi; Terence D Capellini; Vijaya B Kolachalama Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2020-02-13 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Gabby B Joseph; Charles E McCulloch; Jae Ho Sohn; Valentina Pedoia; Sharmila Majumdar; Thomas M Link Journal: Skeletal Radiol Date: 2021-11-04 Impact factor: 2.199
Authors: Bragi Sveinsson; Akshay S Chaudhari; Bo Zhu; Neha Koonjoo; Martin Torriani; Garry E Gold; Matthew S Rosen Journal: Radiol Artif Intell Date: 2021-05-26
Authors: Gary H Chang; Lisa K Park; Nina A Le; Ray S Jhun; Tejus Surendran; Joseph Lai; Hojoon Seo; Nuwapa Promchotichai; Grace Yoon; Jonathan Scalera; Terence D Capellini; David T Felson; Vijaya B Kolachalama Journal: Arthritis Rheumatol Date: 2021-10-29 Impact factor: 10.995
Authors: Sean W Flannery; Ata M Kiapour; David J Edgar; Martha M Murray; Jillian E Beveridge; Braden C Fleming Journal: J Orthop Res Date: 2021-01-27 Impact factor: 3.494
Authors: Alexander Mathiessen; Erin L Ashbeck; Emily Huang; Edward John Bedrick; C Kent Kwoh; Jeffrey Duryea Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2021-07-05 Impact factor: 5.178
Authors: Arjun D Desai; Francesco Caliva; Claudia Iriondo; Aliasghar Mortazi; Sachin Jambawalikar; Ulas Bagci; Mathias Perslev; Christian Igel; Erik B Dam; Sibaji Gaj; Mingrui Yang; Xiaojuan Li; Cem M Deniz; Vladimir Juras; Ravinder Regatte; Garry E Gold; Brian A Hargreaves; Valentina Pedoia; Akshay S Chaudhari Journal: Radiol Artif Intell Date: 2021-02-10