Literature DB >> 33241856

Automated magnetic resonance image segmentation of the anterior cruciate ligament.

Sean W Flannery1,2, Ata M Kiapour3, David J Edgar1,2, Martha M Murray3, Braden C Fleming1,2.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to develop an automated segmentation method for the anterior cruciate ligament that is capable of facilitating quantitative assessments of the ligament in clinical and research settings. A modified U-Net fully convolutional network model was trained, validated, and tested on 246 Constructive Interference in Steady State magnetic resonance images of intact anterior cruciate ligaments. Overall model performance was assessed on the image set relative to an experienced (>5 years) "ground truth" segmenter in two domains: anatomical similarity and the accuracy of quantitative measurements (i.e., signal intensity and volume) obtained from the automated segmentation. To establish model reliability relative to manual segmentation, a subset of the imaging data was resegmented by the ground truth segmenter and two additional segmenters (A, 6 months and B, 2 years of experience), with their performance evaluated relative to the ground truth. The final model scored well on anatomical performance metrics (Dice coefficient = 0.84, precision = 0.82, and sensitivity = 0.85). The median signal intensities and volumes of the automated segmentations were not significantly different from ground truth (0.3% difference, p = .9; 2.3% difference, p = .08, respectively). When the model results were compared with the independent segmenters, the model predictions demonstrated greater median Dice coefficient (A = 0.73, p = .001; B = 0.77, p = NS) and sensitivity (A = 0.68, p = .001; B = 0.72, p = .003). The model performed equivalently well to retest segmentation by the ground truth segmenter on all measures. The quantitative measures extracted from the automated segmentation model did not differ from those of manual segmentation, enabling their use in quantitative magnetic resonance imaging pipelines to evaluate the anterior cruciate ligament.
© 2020 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  anterior cruciate ligament; automated segmentation; deep learning; knee; magnetic resonance imaging

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33241856      PMCID: PMC8005419          DOI: 10.1002/jor.24926

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Res        ISSN: 0736-0266            Impact factor:   3.494


  29 in total

1.  Deep convolutional neural networks for multi-modality isointense infant brain image segmentation.

Authors:  Wenlu Zhang; Rongjian Li; Houtao Deng; Li Wang; Weili Lin; Shuiwang Ji; Dinggang Shen
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2015-01-03       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Automated Segmentation of Knee MRI Using Hierarchical Classifiers and Just Enough Interaction Based Learning: Data from Osteoarthritis Initiative.

Authors:  Satyananda Kashyap; Ipek Oguz; Honghai Zhang; Milan Sonka
Journal:  Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv       Date:  2016-10-02

3.  Cartilage Damage Is Related to ACL Stiffness in a Porcine Model of ACL Repair.

Authors:  Jillian E Beveridge; Benedikt L Proffen; Naga Padmini Karamchedu; Kaitlyn E Chin; Jakob T Sieker; Gary J Badger; Ata M Kiapour; Martha M Murray; Braden C Fleming
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2019-06-25       Impact factor: 3.494

4.  Longitudinal changes in MR T1ρ/T2 signal of meniscus and its association with cartilage T1p/T2 in ACL-injured patients.

Authors:  J Knox; V Pedoia; A Wang; M Tanaka; G B Joseph; J Neumann; T M Link; X Li; C B Ma
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2018-02-10       Impact factor: 6.576

5.  In Situ, noninvasive, T2*-weighted MRI-derived parameters predict ex vivo structural properties of an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction or bioenhanced primary repair in a porcine model.

Authors:  Alison M Biercevicz; Daniel L Miranda; Jason T Machan; Martha M Murray; Braden C Fleming
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2013-01-24       Impact factor: 6.202

6.  Correlation of meniscal T2* with multiphoton microscopy, and change of articular cartilage T2 in an ovine model of meniscal repair.

Authors:  M F Koff; P Shah; S Pownder; B Romero; R Williams; S Gilbert; S Maher; L A Fortier; S A Rodeo; H G Potter
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2013-05-13       Impact factor: 6.576

7.  Fully automatic analysis of the knee articular cartilage T1ρ relaxation time using voxel-based relaxometry.

Authors:  Valentina Pedoia; Xiaojuan Li; Favian Su; Nathaniel Calixto; Sharmila Majumdar
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2015-10-07       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  Fully automated, level set-based segmentation for knee MRIs using an adaptive force function and template: data from the osteoarthritis initiative.

Authors:  Chunsoo Ahn; Toan Duc Bui; Yong-Woo Lee; Jitae Shin; Hyunjin Park
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 2.819

9.  Bridge-Enhanced Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair: Two-Year Results of a First-in-Human Study.

Authors:  Martha M Murray; Leslie A Kalish; Braden C Fleming; Brett Flutie; Christina Freiberger; Rachael N Henderson; Gabriel S Perrone; Laura G Thurber; Benedikt L Proffen; Kirsten Ecklund; Dennis E Kramer; Yi-Meng Yen; Lyle J Micheli
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2019-03-22

Review 10.  SciPy 1.0: fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in Python.

Authors:  Pauli Virtanen; Ralf Gommers; Travis E Oliphant; Matt Haberland; Tyler Reddy; David Cournapeau; Evgeni Burovski; Pearu Peterson; Warren Weckesser; Jonathan Bright; Stéfan J van der Walt; Matthew Brett; Joshua Wilson; K Jarrod Millman; Nikolay Mayorov; Andrew R J Nelson; Eric Jones; Robert Kern; Eric Larson; C J Carey; İlhan Polat; Yu Feng; Eric W Moore; Jake VanderPlas; Denis Laxalde; Josef Perktold; Robert Cimrman; Ian Henriksen; E A Quintero; Charles R Harris; Anne M Archibald; Antônio H Ribeiro; Fabian Pedregosa; Paul van Mulbregt
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 28.547

View more
  8 in total

1.  Regional Differences in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Signal Intensity After Surgical Treatment.

Authors:  Ata M Kiapour; Sean W Flannery; Martha M Murray; Patricia E Miller; Benedikt L Proffen; Nicholas Sant; Gabriela Portilla; Ryan Sanborn; Christina Freiberger; Rachael Henderson; Samuel Barnett; Kirsten Ecklund; Yi-Meng Yen; Dennis E Kramer; Lyle J Micheli; Braden C Fleming
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2021-10-20       Impact factor: 6.202

2.  Reproducibility and postacquisition correction methods for quantitative magnetic resonance imaging of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL).

Authors:  Sean W Flannery; Edward G Walsh; Ryan M Sanborn; Cynthia A Chrostek; Meggin Q Costa; Shankar G Kaushal; Martha M Murray; Braden C Fleming; Ata M Kiapour
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2022-03-10       Impact factor: 3.102

3.  A transfer learning approach for automatic segmentation of the surgically treated anterior cruciate ligament.

Authors:  Sean W Flannery; Ata M Kiapour; David J Edgar; Martha M Murray; Jillian E Beveridge; Braden C Fleming
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 3.494

4.  Intelligent localization and quantitative evaluation of anterior talofibular ligament injury using magnetic resonance imaging of ankle.

Authors:  Wen Yan; Xianghong Meng; Jinglai Sun; Hui Yu; Zhi Wang
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2021-08-28       Impact factor: 1.930

5.  Automated Knee MR Images Segmentation of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears.

Authors:  Mazhar Javed Awan; Mohd Shafry Mohd Rahim; Naomie Salim; Amjad Rehman; Begonya Garcia-Zapirain
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 3.576

6.  Automatic segmentation model of intercondylar fossa based on deep learning: a novel and effective assessment method for the notch volume.

Authors:  Mifang Li; Hanhua Bai; Feiyuan Zhang; Yujia Zhou; Qiuyu Lin; Quan Zhou; Qianjin Feng; Lingyan Zhang
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-05-06       Impact factor: 2.562

7.  A deep learning approach for anterior cruciate ligament rupture localization on knee MR images.

Authors:  Cheng Qu; Heng Yang; Cong Wang; Chongyang Wang; Mengjie Ying; Zheyi Chen; Kai Yang; Jing Zhang; Kang Li; Dimitris Dimitriou; Tsung-Yuan Tsai; Xudong Liu
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-09-30

8.  Clinical-Grade MRI-Based Methods to Identify Combined Anatomic Factors That Predict ACL Injury Risk in Male and Female Athletes.

Authors:  Mélanie L Beaulieu; Emma K Nowak; Bruce D Beynnon; James A Ashton-Miller; Daniel R Sturnick; Edward M Wojtys
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 7.010

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.