Literature DB >> 33973737

Subchondral Bone Length in Knee Osteoarthritis: A Deep Learning-Derived Imaging Measure and Its Association With Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes.

Gary H Chang1, Lisa K Park1, Nina A Le1, Ray S Jhun1, Tejus Surendran1, Joseph Lai1, Hojoon Seo1, Nuwapa Promchotichai1, Grace Yoon1, Jonathan Scalera1, Terence D Capellini2, David T Felson3, Vijaya B Kolachalama1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To develop a bone shape measure that reflects the extent of cartilage loss and bone flattening in knee osteoarthritis (OA) and test it against estimates of disease severity.
METHODS: A fast region-based convolutional neural network was trained to crop the knee joints in sagittal dual-echo steady-state magnetic resonance imaging sequences obtained from the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI). Publicly available annotations of the cartilage and menisci were used as references to annotate the tibia and the femur in 61 knees. Another deep neural network (U-Net) was developed to learn these annotations. Model predictions were compared to radiologist-driven annotations on an independent test set (27 knees). The U-Net was applied to automatically extract the knee joint structures on the larger OAI data set (n = 9,434 knees). We defined subchondral bone length (SBL), a novel shape measure characterizing the extent of overlying cartilage and bone flattening, and examined its relationship with radiographic joint space narrowing (JSN), concurrent pain and disability (according to the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index), as well as subsequent partial or total knee replacement. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) for each outcome were estimated using relative changes in SBL from the OAI data set stratified into quartiles.
RESULTS: The mean SBL values for knees with JSN were consistently different from knees without JSN. Greater changes of SBL from baseline were associated with greater pain and disability. For knees with medial or lateral JSN, the ORs for future knee replacement between the lowest and highest quartiles corresponding to SBL changes were 5.68 (95% CI 3.90-8.27) and 7.19 (95% CI 3.71-13.95), respectively.
CONCLUSION: SBL quantified OA status based on JSN severity and shows promise as an imaging marker in predicting clinical and structural OA outcomes.
© 2021, American College of Rheumatology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33973737      PMCID: PMC8581065          DOI: 10.1002/art.41808

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthritis Rheumatol        ISSN: 2326-5191            Impact factor:   10.995


  36 in total

1.  Prevalence of bone attrition on knee radiographs and MRI in a community-based cohort.

Authors:  S Reichenbach; A Guermazi; J Niu; T Neogi; D J Hunter; F W Roemer; C E McLennan; G Hernandez-Molina; D T Felson
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2008-03-25       Impact factor: 6.576

Review 2.  Knee pain and osteoarthritis in older adults: a review of community burden and current use of primary health care.

Authors:  G Peat; R McCarney; P Croft
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 19.103

3.  Inducible chondrocyte-specific overexpression of BMP2 in young mice results in severe aggravation of osteophyte formation in experimental OA without altering cartilage damage.

Authors:  E N Blaney Davidson; E L Vitters; M B Bennink; P L E M van Lent; A P M van Caam; A B Blom; W B van den Berg; F A J van de Loo; P M van der Kraan
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 4.  What is the role of imaging in the clinical diagnosis of osteoarthritis and disease management?

Authors:  Xia Wang; Win Min Oo; James M Linklater
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 7.580

5.  Assessment of knee pain from MR imaging using a convolutional Siamese network.

Authors:  Gary H Chang; David T Felson; Shangran Qiu; Ali Guermazi; Terence D Capellini; Vijaya B Kolachalama
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2020-02-13       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Atlas of individual radiographic features in osteoarthritis, revised.

Authors:  R D Altman; G E Gold
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 6.576

7.  Learning osteoarthritis imaging biomarkers from bone surface spherical encoding.

Authors:  Alejandro Morales Martinez; Francesco Caliva; Io Flament; Felix Liu; Jinhee Lee; Peng Cao; Rutwik Shah; Sharmila Majumdar; Valentina Pedoia
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2020-04-03       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 8.  OARSI recommendations for the management of hip and knee osteoarthritis, Part II: OARSI evidence-based, expert consensus guidelines.

Authors:  W Zhang; R W Moskowitz; G Nuki; S Abramson; R D Altman; N Arden; S Bierma-Zeinstra; K D Brandt; P Croft; M Doherty; M Dougados; M Hochberg; D J Hunter; K Kwoh; L S Lohmander; P Tugwell
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 6.576

9.  Deep convolutional neural network for segmentation of knee joint anatomy.

Authors:  Zhaoye Zhou; Gengyan Zhao; Richard Kijowski; Fang Liu
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 4.668

10.  Diagnosis of Osteoarthritis by Cartilage Surface Smoothness Quantified Automatically from Knee MRI.

Authors:  Sudhakar Tummala; Anne-Christine Bay-Jensen; Morten A Karsdal; Erik B Dam
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.634

View more
  2 in total

1.  A Machine Learning Model to Predict Knee Osteoarthritis Cartilage Volume Changes over Time Using Baseline Bone Curvature.

Authors:  Hossein Bonakdari; Jean-Pierre Pelletier; François Abram; Johanne Martel-Pelletier
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2022-05-26

Review 2.  Discovering Knee Osteoarthritis Imaging Features for Diagnosis and Prognosis: Review of Manual Imaging Grading and Machine Learning Approaches.

Authors:  Yun Xin Teoh; Khin Wee Lai; Juliana Usman; Siew Li Goh; Hamidreza Mohafez; Khairunnisa Hasikin; Pengjiang Qian; Yizhang Jiang; Yuanpeng Zhang; Samiappan Dhanalakshmi
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2022-02-18       Impact factor: 2.682

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.